<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Sep 26 2008, 11:23 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Hyper critical when he's winning.
Hyper critical when he's losing.
Exactly how you are about Rossi!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Sep 26 2008, 11:23 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Stoner can do whatever the hell he wants. He's the fastest man in motogp and he's just riding around in circles until he gets his wrist fixed for the 2009 season.
Isn't this exactly how you like Stoner---defeated? What's the problem?
Again; exactly how you like Rossi! What's your problem?
Well technically, on his race times over the last four races; Stoner isn't the "fastest man in motogp" in order to win you need to complete the race. It's not called "Fastest single lap of the track Championship" is it? He certainly wasn't the fastest at Indy in any case!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Sep 26 2008, 11:23 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I seem to remember Rossi packing it in at the end of last season. He didn't even bother to finish at Valencia. He just came in and handed 2nd to Pedrosa. The year before that he chucked it down the road with the title on the line.
Didn't the engine give up? Or are you so in with the "real" MotoGP that you are going to tell us that he in fact put it in neutral and gave second in the championship to Pedrobot? Yeah, right.
Some of your arguments actually sound plausible - and then you go and say things like that
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Sep 26 2008, 11:23 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Now that the governing body is back in his corner, Rossi is a great champ and Stoner is a defeated chump?
Your life must be awful. I can't imagine getting worked up over Stoner's work ethic---this isn't politics, nobody has to vote him on to the bike. Who gives a damn, if he wanted to quit he could. He doesn't have to smile for the camera every lap. Unlike Rossi, Stoner is not on DORNA's payroll.
And here it is folks - the old paranoid conspiracy theories are right back in it! You say you can't imagine getting worked up over Stoner's work ethic - yet you do with Rossi's! So if Dorna are now back in Rossi's corner - then were they in Hayden's when he won the title? Or Stoner's?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Sep 26 2008, 11:23 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>In 2003 Rossi had dyed hair, he wore rad shades with a backward cap, and he took swings at other riders. In 2004 he showed up with no earings, no shades or backward cap, and no hair dye, and a cleverly disguised salon quality hairdo. Tell me he wasn't put on the DORNA payroll to bring Yamaha back to life and put some drama in the championship chase.
Ezy has created a marketing monster.
Because no sportsman ever changed their image or haircut on their own have they!? If Dorna have half as much control over the results as you claim - they why didn't they take someone else to resurrect Yamaha - they could have used Marco, Gibernau, Max - who they liked and let's face it; all three of them are probably "cheaper" than Rossi!
If Rossi is important to Dorna as you claim then I doubt if they would care if he turned up in dungarees!
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Sep 26 2008, 11:23 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Oh yeah, back to Stoner. He can do whatever Rossi is allowed to do. If he wants to bin it in Valencia to protest his early season tire problems, I'd better not here any grumbling.
On a side note, this sounds like a Mladin interview. Is Mladin his uncle or something?
If you hear grumbling - it's probably your own voice! Your as anti-Rossi as any of the Rossi fanboys (who you hate) are anti-Stoner
Let's just hope that Nicky can do something in the Duke next year so you'll have something to take your mind off Rossi winning! Mind you - I suppose if Nicky wins on the Duke then that will be all down to Dorna too???