Joined Oct 2006
25K Posts | 4K+
Your Mom's House
This quote, and the quotes that prompted it raise a question in my mind. Levi and I were discussing it over the phone and I'd like to hear more Slider's opinions. I hope I can come across as not biased, because I love Nicky and really admire Stoner's talent. Nothing would make me happier than to see Stoner race and win. My question is this.......which is the more professional race attitude? The one that pushes the envelope of a bike that one knows is "weak in the front end" and crashes in doing so, or is it more professional to realize your machine's limitations and race and score points without busting the envelope and throwing it into the gravel? I'm not trying to be an instigator, I'm just asking for objective opinions.
A few thoughts enter my mind as I deliberate on this. Nobody can deny Casey's raw talent as a motorcycle rider, but were talking about motorcycle racing, isn't the better racer one that shows some restraint? (a fan wants to see a rider that is hanging off that screaming bike but what does a race owner want?) Or, is Nicky just not talented enough to explore the edge of the performance envelope, or is he? I've always liked Nicky for his determination and pluck, but deep down did not think that he really had the talent to be a consistent race winner (last year's sentiments). His displays lately however, have gotten me to think that he does have the talent to race (and hopefully win) and develop a great racing machine (maybe not as exciting to watch race but the guy of more value in your racing paddock as an owner/manufacturer.
I'm beginning to ramble and mix thoughts but I think you get the idea of my question, would like to hear your thoughtful opinions........
Hey Gator, what’s up bro. Levi and I had a similar conversation. Seems we needed to verbalize our frustrations about Stoner and make some kinda sense out of it, eh (knowing you guys admire Casey, as I do). I think we’ve lost CKid though, hahaha, maybe it was hangover from the night before that prompted his text to me about poor Casey, as he put it: “....’em he’s a .....!” Hahahaha. Anyway, yeah good question about pushing the front end in regard to “professionalism” though I don't think I can answer it the way its posed. I’ll start with “I don’t know bro.” (Same thing I told Levi), and some rambling to make myself sound like I could figure it out, but in the end, I told him, “I just think Casey needs a big hug.” Hahaha
But after watching the race a few more times and thinking about it, I’ll offer my thoughts: Keep in mind, it’s dramatically a new bike this year, and as much as the magnitude of the change has effected Nicky positively, it not a stretch to consider that its effected Stoner in an opposite way. (Though despite yesterday’s crash, I still think it too early to tell). Another poster mentioned this (Son of Doohan). I for one never have doubted Nicky’s talent (yes very bias) as I believe if you gave Nicky a conventional top tier bike like Yamaha/Honda with the support offered to Lorenzo, Rossi, Pedro, and I’d be willing to wager 6 months salary (I know, chump change) you’d see him battling with the “aliens”. I know the last few years haven’t looked like it, but I would be willing to back up the bias with much detailed explanation to address his lack of performance since his 06 title. So your question also begs the question, did Nicky suddenly become more “professional”? (Not quite the perfect comparison, I concede, but I think you might get what I’m trying to say.) That is, can we say that Stoner’s crashes are better explained through some tangible mechanical change to the bike (as a system) rather than some intangible reason like “professionalism”? Honest question.
Stoner is mind-boggling fast, even Ben Spies said he understands Rossi’s speed, but when he observes Stoner, it’s still a mystery to him (amazing right?). Most of the time he’s been with Duc, he’s been the fastest man at the event. But several times, and for us who admire the man a bit wearisome, he hasn’t come out on top; frustrating yes. If I had to question something about his riding abilities, maybe I’d go with him needing to fine-tune his ‘racecraft’ (and maybe at that). Perspective: Qatar was the first time Stoner rode the new bike in a ‘race setting’ (sure he tested & practiced with it, but I think most of us will agree a race is infinitely a different animal).
So here is partly my answer to your genuine question regarding professionalism vs crashes: I don't think its some lack of professionalism (or mental strength, etc.) in my head-scratching opinion. (Like I said, I don't think I can totally answer your question within the conditions you pose, certainly for an owner, finishing a race is more valuable than crashing, but if risking the very limit that may result in the owner winning a championship then it might change the parameter of risk taking). Consider that not all warnings to limits are created equal either; the Duc is a very unique bike, as three world champs have not cracked its enigmatic code! Melandri said the bike felt like riding on water & Nicky said while looking at himself on TV, its not as it appear, the bike is unpredictable (not exactly a bike you would think gave most humans ample warning it had reached it critical mass, eh.) Stoner learned to ride it though, and partly due to his unique style; however, the new bike (as somebody described) has been Japanese-ized) that is to say, behaves more like a conventional Honda/Yamaha. Might explain why Nicky is getting along with the bike much better, where as this perhaps has been detrimental in regards to Stoner’s style of riding. Testing and practice is measured, but the sensations of a race, including the duress and adrenaline and heat of competition perhaps converge and conspire for Stoner to return to the riding style where he had previously been so successful on the screamer but detrimental on the big bang (not far fetched). In his post race comments (crash.net) Stoner said they need to sort out this issue, and if that means having to “change his riding style” he’ll do it. Now that sounds professional and I’ll add humble. I think had he been stubborn and said something like, ‘they’ need to figure the mechanical issues out as oppose to including himself a part of the problem/solution, then I’d go with unprofessional and add arrogant. I think we spectator make the mistake in thinking that these crashes and lack of performance are switches that these guys can and should turn on and off at will, but I think the difference between a tenth here and there is the limit difference of a crash and a victory. These fallible boys (Casey is still very young) are on the very physical limits of rubber, metal, and the programmer’s codes during a race (all of which are not equally created), I think of it as playing catch with nitroglycerin, one tiny, itsy bitsy small false move and you're toast.
my 2 cents for now