Stoner gets new parts to help with fatigue

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Oct 2 2009, 06:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I'm trying to find the "head shaking with frustration" smiley as we speak cos just don't cut it in the case of Shinyas comment

Surely he's kidding even further? .... than the "composer" of that "article"


Feel free to use as wished: 8311:shakehead.gif]





Gaz

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JohnnyKnockdown @ Oct 1 2009, 07:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Than you and Hayden have a lot in common
At least Hayden is getting faster, this numbnuts is regressing.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (xx CURVE xx @ Oct 2 2009, 06:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>tis all thats missing.

8308:testicles.jpg]




Great thread, highly amuzin!!! this is why I love this place

After all this Stoner-bashing I'm quite delighted to see stoner eat hayden and everybody else.
face it , stoner on the duke is the ....

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cliché guevara @ Oct 3 2009, 06:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>After all this Stoner-bashing I'm quite delighted to see stoner eat hayden and everybody else.
face it , stoner on the duke is the ....
Stoner Is a fast motherfer but his speed is not the issue, Him being a ..... is!

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The California Kid @ Oct 3 2009, 03:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Stoner Is a fast motherfer but his speed is not the issue, Him being a ..... is!
I seem to recall at least 18 or so races in which he has overcome his inner ..... .

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (michaelm @ Oct 3 2009, 07:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I seem to recall at least 18 or so races in which he has overcome his inner ..... .
I meant ..... By Proffesional Moto gp Racer standards!!!!

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The California Kid @ Oct 3 2009, 03:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I meant ..... By Proffesional Moto gp Racer standards!!!!
It depends what standard you apply. Your case is strong if your yardstick is mick doohan or valentino rossi, but this still leaves room for him to be fairly tough. Even valentino whilst (this hurts me) quite probably better overall than doohan has proved fragile on (rather rare) occasion, but arguably more than his peers in other sports such as joe montana or michael jordan.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cliché guevara @ Oct 3 2009, 02:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>After all this Stoner-bashing I'm quite delighted to see stoner eat hayden and everybody else.
face it , stoner on the duke is the ....
yeah, well there's a spoiler thread for these types of comments that indicate what happened

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (michaelm @ Oct 4 2009, 12:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I seem to recall at least 18 or so races in which he has overcome his inner ..... .

Compared to what? VR has around 102 races with no ..... present if you want to go there, in fact VR has never had any ..... present (other than what is waiting for him after-which I wish I could gain a glimpse at!!!) No point in bringing up the stats mate, as they are clearly stacked against your already terminally flawed argument....

We shouldn't even be talking about a Professional Motogp rider not competing because of a lack of balls, anytime a rider has missed consecutive rounds it has been because of serious physical injury, and most of these cases the rider(s) have come back too early in order to compete for the title, this takes balls, other Aussie have them and had them-especially MD.

These guys are there because they are the pick of the bunch, the best of the best, in Talent, attitude and continued performance.......just because your fast doesn't make you worthy of this opportunity and can only last for so long with the fans, sponsors and manufactures.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The California Kid @ Oct 4 2009, 12:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Stoner Is a fast motherfer but his speed is not the issue, Him being a ..... is!


You are aware of the possible "image" you are setting up for yourself aren't you.

I mean you are a forum hero like the rest of us ......... Stoner is the current fastest guy in MGP ........ ...... and the shaky head smiley too

And your avatar picture kinda ads to the effect too


Stoner a ..... ......... what a ....

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Oct 4 2009, 01:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>You are aware of the possible "image" you are setting up for yourself aren't you.

I mean you are a forum hero like the rest of us ......... Stoner is the current fastest guy in MGP ........ ...... and the shaky head smiley too

And your avatar picture kinda ads to the effect too


Stoner a ..... ......... what a ....
how do you work that one out ??

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 4 2009, 12:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Compared to what? VR has around 102 races with no ..... present if you want to go there, in fact VR has never had any ..... present (other than what is waiting for him after-which I wish I could gain a glimpse at!!!) No point in bringing up the stats mate, as they are clearly stacked against your already terminally flawed argument....

We shouldn't even be talking about a Professional Motogp rider not competing because of a lack of balls, anytime a rider has missed consecutive rounds it has been because of serious physical injury, and most of these cases the rider(s) have come back too early in order to compete for the title, this takes balls, other Aussie have them and had them-especially MD.

These guys are there because they are the pick of the bunch, the best of the best, in Talent, attitude and continued performance.......just because your fast doesn't make you worthy of this opportunity and can only last for so long with the fans, sponsors and manufactures.
I presume you are referring to another of my posts on the thread, or perhaps I should take it as a compliment that you think I can make an argument, terminally flawed or otherwise, in one sentence. On the other hand, mounting both the argument and the rebuttal yourself might be a good tactic for you given your limitations.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (michaelm @ Oct 4 2009, 10:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I presume you are referring to another of my posts on the thread, or perhaps I should take it as a compliment that you think I can make an argument, terminally flawed or otherwise, in one sentence. On the other hand, mounting both the argument and the rebuttal yourself might be a good tactic for you given your limitations.


WTF?? so where does your rebuttal lie? Of course Nowhere, I was referring to the post I quoted bringing up Stats, once again you have supplied us with some rhetorical nonsense to try to smear the issue because, as I pointed out, your argument is terminally flawed, CS took 2 months off and went fishing in the outback to solve his mental crisis, very difficult to defend this behavior and I actually pity you, for the longer you persist the less intelligent and more patriarchal it becomes.

Thank you for trying to point out my apparent limitations , actually to have limitations is not such a bad thing as it means you did go somewhere before you reach the limit, unlike the Stoner Defense.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Oct 4 2009, 12:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>WTF?? so where does your rebuttal lie? Of course Nowhere, I was referring to the post I quoted bringing up Stats, once again you have supplied us with some rhetorical nonsense to try to smear the issue because, as I pointed out, your argument is terminally flawed, CS took 2 months off and went fishing in the outback to solve his mental crisis, very difficult to defend this behavior and I actually pity you, for the longer you persist the less intelligent and more patriarchal it becomes.

Thank you for trying to point out my apparent limitations , actually to have limitations is not such a bad thing as it means you did go somewhere before you reach the limit, unlike the Stoner Defense.
The post you quoted was a one line post. In the post to which you may be referring which preceded any by you I actually said that doohan and rossi were the benchmarks for mental toughness.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Traverser @ Oct 1 2009, 06:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Should not all the teams be doing this for all the riders?

Well yeah, I thought that, that's what they were supposed to do.

It's not just about tweaking carbs and gas flowing is it!

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chopperman @ Oct 4 2009, 12:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'> how do you work that one out ??


well,based on the fact that he is the only one to get the ducati go fast.the bike that nearly destroyed melandris career,that even gibernau wasn't able to tame.

sorry if i spoiled anything,i took it for granted that everybody knew that stoner would wipe the floor with the other ducati riders if he retained 50% of his talent

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cliché guevara @ Oct 6 2009, 07:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>well,based on the fact that he is the only one to get the ducati go fast.the bike that nearly destroyed melandris career,that even gibernau wasn't able to tame.

sorry if i spoiled anything,i took it for granted that everybody knew that stoner would wipe the floor with the other ducati riders if he retained 50% of his talent
My reply was to barrymachine who stated ,and i quote "Stoner is the current fastest guy in MGP". Nothing about being the fastest guy in ducati !

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chopperman @ Oct 6 2009, 04:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>My reply was to barrymachine who stated ,and i quote "Stoner is the current fastest guy in MGP". Nothing about being the fastest guy in ducati !


Gee's Rog. why do I have to spell EVERYTHING out for you especially, ......

Yes I guess it stands to reason that since Stoner is the fastest guy in Motogp, then logically he's also the fastest Ducati, I just don't see why it had to be said

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Oct 6 2009, 08:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Gee's Rog. why do I have to spell EVERYTHING out for you especially, ......

Yes I guess it stands to reason that since Stoner is the fastest guy in Motogp, then logically he's also the fastest Ducati, I just don't see why it had to be said











i didnt say anything about ducati, your alter ego did. i refuted your claim that stoner is the fastest guy in motogp at the moment. I asked you how you figured that out. im still waiting !
ironicly/moronicly you made that statement on sunsay the 4th when stoner only qualified 3rd, so again how do you figure stoner is the fastest man in motogp on sunday the 4th