Joined Sep 2007
2K Posts | 60+
here
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Duc999 @ Mar 31 2008, 03:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I think that Capirex, Bayliss, Gibernau and Checa all contributed to the developement of the Ducati. You would think that if the bike was so totally centered around Capirex's input... he would be the one who would extract all that and then some out of the Duke.
He did not.
Thus Ducati and their development were not solely centered around Capirex. Thus that is why Rossi did not jump to Ducati. That is my original point. Capirex was there the longest but the bike wasn't totally tailored made for him.
Gibernau's results were not the greater of the two true indeed but he was able to show potential with the bike that Capirex did not.
Don't really want to get into a war of words here - you obviously feel strongly that Capi failed somehow.
It's just that I don't see any failure to "show potential" in 2006 - 3 wins, 4 2nds (most of them fighting for 1st to the end), a 3rd and finishing 3rd in the championship only 23 points adrift of Hayden.
I agree that the 990 Duke was not "tailored" for Capi despite his loyalty, but that makes his achievement greater than if it had been IMO.
He did not.
Thus Ducati and their development were not solely centered around Capirex. Thus that is why Rossi did not jump to Ducati. That is my original point. Capirex was there the longest but the bike wasn't totally tailored made for him.
Gibernau's results were not the greater of the two true indeed but he was able to show potential with the bike that Capirex did not.
Don't really want to get into a war of words here - you obviously feel strongly that Capi failed somehow.
It's just that I don't see any failure to "show potential" in 2006 - 3 wins, 4 2nds (most of them fighting for 1st to the end), a 3rd and finishing 3rd in the championship only 23 points adrift of Hayden.
I agree that the 990 Duke was not "tailored" for Capi despite his loyalty, but that makes his achievement greater than if it had been IMO.