No, but the way he suddenly closed on the last lap after 'struggling' the previous 3 was an eye opener. Neither did Rossi, as he rode right up to MM after the finish and shook his hand. It was after he watched the race that it became 'more clear' what was happening.
And was explained as an overheated front tyre, on which he slowed for 4-5 laps before the tyre came back .......... the rest we know
This is an entirely logical suggestion and one that was somewhat supported by Bradley Smith who reported similar issues with his tyre at another meeting, and subsequently by DP (and MM himself) at Valencia who both described front tyre issues
Additionally, Crutchlow and other Honda riders reported 'similar lack of confidence' in the front throughout the season.
As for Rossi changing his thoughts (to which he is entitled) one must ask just what preceded it?
What was it exactly that had him thinking?
Was it a lap, an action, an overtake, a comment by a third party or perhaps even MM after the race?
Really not important what I think, I wasn't the one in the battle. Neither were you. Andrea also questioned the race, saying MM was really slow out of 5 and he kept passing him easily. This alone makes the theory somewhat credible so I have no question to doubt them.
To you it makes the theory somewhat credible but the full circumstances can also be seen to add large doubt to the alternative view, so just to review.
- Nobody made comments immediately after the race
- Ianonne is abused on Social media and threatened by the rabid fraternity of the Rossi cultists
- Rossi shows leadership and on social media (and I believe in a media interview) implored these people to stop their actions as it was unfair on Ianonne and not what Rossi stood for within himself or the sport. IMO only, but this was very good positive leadership by Rossi who could no doubt see the implications for Ianonne
- We go to Sepang and the proverbial hits the fan with VR's comments outlining his suspicions (although he does not define a suspicion but outright accuses MM)
- Ianonne is asked (in some sections it is said that VR mentioned that 'Ianonne agrees with me' which prompted the question, where in others it is said Ianonne responded to a direct question after VR voiced his suspicions
The issue or inference being that Ianonne made no independent commentary until VR had raised concerns and that given that VR had defended him then perhaps 'Ianonne was paying back' as a thank you for the support.
In other areas people have said that Ianonne being Italian was supporting his fellow Italian (sound familiar regarding compatriot support?)
And lol, at 2000 word spin doctor essays in response to ANYTHING that is evenly remotely pro VR as if these members are not entitled to an opinion that is contrary to theirs. Seems I ruffled a few feathers here. There are some people with serious mental disorders on this site.
You haven't ruffled my feathers, they are tarred on so very difficult to ruffle anyway but it would seem that it is not just the 200 word essayists who may have their feathers ruffled
But I do enjoy how you come here and define or determine that people who disagree with your view and are willing to debate it with you, have 'serious mental disorders' and yet you seem to (by exception) exclude the more rabid Rossi supporters from a similar diagnosis