www.gpone.com/en/2013112812306/Stoner-Ora-Con-la-Ducati-arriverebbe-6.html
He also said that Stoner could still finish sixth on the Ducati today...
He also said that Stoner could still finish sixth on the Ducati today...
3699191385811383
www.gpone.com/en/2013112812306/Stoner-Ora-Con-la-Ducati-arriverebbe-6.html
He also said that Stoner could still finish sixth on the Ducati today...
3699191385811383
www.gpone.com/en/2013112812306/Stoner-Ora-Con-la-Ducati-arriverebbe-6.html
He also said that Stoner could still finish sixth on the Ducati today...
3699201385812571
The implication being no better than him, I thought.
A little bitchy, but then I gather Stoner wasn't very complimentary about him in the recent book either.
3699301385833473
If Stoner had been on the Ducati this season he would have regularly finished in 4th place i.e. consistently one place ahead of il Clowno
3699271385829112
True
3699291385832875
.... dirtiest riders in the series when he was winning, but he got away with it because he's so good with the crowd and the camera.
3699291385832875
I've read the book and you're right, Stoner isn't complementary at all. He basically implies that Rossi was one of the dirtiest riders in the series when he was winning, but he got away with it because he's so good with the crowd and the camera.
3699391385837583
Pfff. He is still whining about Laguna seca 2008. What a ..... !
3699431385840155
Not just Laguna, but lots of other races. He says that Rossi repeatedly put other riders in danger with his antics. And Rossi did a Bautista on Stoner at Jerez in 2011, after all.
That being said, I don't remember ever thinking of Rossi as dangerous. It would be interesting to see what other riders think of this, whether Rossi did take too many risks, or whether Stoner is just overstating things.
It's also worth to note that, in the article, Rossi says that the paddock is a happier place without Stoner in it.
3699441385840933
More like a Pedrosa Estoril 06. Rossi went for the pass and lost the front. Thats racing ! Besides, stoner did leave the door open inviting the pass.
I knew his book would be nothing but a Whine fest.
3699201385812571
The implication being no better than him, I thought.
A little bitchy, but then I gather Stoner wasn't very complimentary about him in the recent book either.
3699361385836407
Only the names have changed.
3699451385843180
I wish I could say it wasn't a whine fest...but the fact is, a good portion of the book is a detailed list of complaints. Rossi and Stoner may hate each other (and with good reason), but I don't doubt what Rossi said about the paddock being a happier place without Stoner. Casey doesn't seem like the most pleasant person to be around.
3699481385861582
I bought it yesterday and skimmed through it after reading this latest thing from Valentino.
I have not seen much evidence of him being disliked by other riders apart from Valentino and Abraham, and the same people who were arguing he and Jorge and Dani were too cosy seem to be the ones saying relationships are friendlier in the paddock now.
3699481385861582
I bought it yesterday and skimmed through it after reading this latest thing from Valentino.
I never read sporting autobiographies no matter how interested I am in the subject and I don't think this book will change my approach. I don't think Casey and/or his ghost writer are any threat to my preferred sports writers, Damon Runyon and Norman Mailer and Hunter S Thompson in their ventures into sports writing. It does largely consist of self justification which I have mainly heard before, and hence not of particular interest even to me; what I thought was wrong with his ankle was true, it was a talar dome fracture.
He does what he always did though, and calls it as he sees it, and I don't think much of it can be called incorrect even objectively. He mainly criticises Rossi for dirty riding at Laguna seca 2008 and not otherwise, and says his concerns there were other than the corkscrew incident (which he was not happy about for other reasons, presumably because it was a riding error), and that Valentino largely rode brilliantly in the race . He says that Valentino's ambition exceeded his talent at Jerez 2011, not that it was a dirty move. His main complaint seems to be about that certain element among Valentino's fans, and Valentino's tacit approval of their attitude to him and Biaggi and Gibernau before him, and what he saw as arrogance regarding his efforts at Ducati from Valentino and JB prior to them going there.
I have not seen much evidence of him being disliked by other riders apart from Valentino and Abraham, and the same people who were arguing he and Jorge and Dani were too cosy seem to be the ones saying relationships are friendlier in the paddock now.
3699431385840155
Not just Laguna, but lots of other races. He says that Rossi repeatedly put other riders in danger with his antics. And Rossi did a Bautista on Stoner at Jerez in 2011, after all.
That being said, I don't remember ever thinking of Rossi as dangerous. It would be interesting to see what other riders think of this, whether Rossi did take too many risks, or whether Stoner is just overstating things.
It's also worth to note that, in the article, Rossi says that the paddock is a happier place without Stoner in it.
3699391385837583
Pfff. He is still whining about Laguna seca 2008. What a ..... !