So Mick thinks Rossi is at the bottom of the slope. I fully expect Rossi's fans to jump all over him, as they do when ever somebody has suggested Rossi is close to done. I'm sure they will remain consistent in their chastising of people who have suggested Rossi is at the tail end of his career, and too old to cut it. Or, maybe this time, they will use it as a justification for his recent struggling? Let the spin begin...
LINK
For the record, I totally disagree with this assessment. Rossi is till very much at the top of his own game, same hunger, same self-confidence, same aggressive tactics, same talent as before, and great health; not to mention, God knows he's still has all the support resources in the world to compete at the highest level.
How will
some answer this conundrum? Is he struggling because he has lost talent? Then maybe Stoner was correct in his assessment which reflects Doohan's words here. Rossi managed to win and podium regularly when he came back from leg injury (which has for all intents and purposes, has completely healed, as nobody had made any mention of it) but while suffering from a shoulder injury. However, it has since been repaired and near completely on the mend (even according to Rossi himself). Yet he is struggling with the Ducati in the dry and taking people out in the wet, seems rather sudden to have lost so much "talent" in as little as a few months if you consider he took Yamaha to the podium in the season finale. Which is why I believe he still has all the talent he had last year and the year before that, but a great bike masked his real abilities. How will Doohan's comments be received, on one thread, his word about the crash are gold, but here he seems to say Rossi's talent is at the tale end, giving credence to the linear relationship of 'ambition over talent' that Stoner cited.
I especially liked this comment, as it reminds me of a few members (I won't name any names). But perhaps a particular boy-band brand of fan is starting to leave the spectators masses, as this time more disagreed than agreed. Granted still half agreed with this comment below:
11802:9X WC.png]
Discuss