Joined Feb 2007
11K Posts | 2K+
Tennessee
More stuff and nonsense from Oxley. Even if he considers MM and Rossi to be equally guilty which seems to have the status of established historical fact for Oxley (you and I obviously disagree, and can't see that he is guilty at all) how on earth does Jorge become one of the co-accused between the Sepang and Valencia pre-race press conferences?
I see the point. And I agree, especially with press con stuff. what dorna did was obviously a mistake.
I liked the stuff about the 250 I agree and owning a 250GP bike is one of my dreams. The other stuff about the 3 school children fighting was ........ though.
They are truly amazing. But expensive to keep in tyres (my mate ...... a set of Dunlops in 3 laps playing with tyre pressure...) And piston supply is getting sketchy.
Best racebikes ....... Ever.
I'd buy an RSW250 just to lick
They are truly amazing. But expensive to keep in tyres (my mate ...... a set of Dunlops in 3 laps playing with tyre pressure...) And piston supply is getting sketchy.
Best racebikes ....... Ever.
I'd buy an RSW250 just to lick
Import one from Japan. They are usually really well maintained and often have spares. If they are around. That's how I got my 125
The vast majority didn't do anything wrong, just the THREE guilty guys?
0+0+1=3?
Uhm....there was only ONE guilty guy, and Oxley is part of the problem because he refuses to identify the singular reason all this .... happened.
Thursday Sepang: Rossi goes full McCarthyist Yellow scare, Salem Witch hunt.
Is Marquez guilty or accused of being guilty? Accused only! No guilt proven.
Lorenzo: n/a
Sepang race: Rossi goes full torpedo mode; GUILTY.
Was Marquez guilty of something? News to me.
Lorenzo : n/a
------------------
Valencia race: Rossi goes full Area 51, Grass knoll. Guilty of accusation.
Is Marquez guilty of something I'm not aware of during the race?
Lorenzo: n/a
How the .... did Mat Oxley determine there are THREE people guilty of the end of season debacle?
Rather randomly, someone called "Prophet" on Twitter has screen captured your post Jums and sent it to Matt Oxley.
https://twitter.com/anonymprophet/status/705262468256264192
Of course Jorge had a stake, he was in a tight battle for the title and in all likelihood his competitor was 3 points to the good by taking another rider out, or arguably 16; I am happy to call it 3. Yamaha may have had cause for complaint depending on the terms of Jorge's contract, but I don't see that Dorna did.Good spot #22.
That's a bit creepy. Obviously Prophet must be a member here. I wonder who that is. Anybody want to chime in?
Looks like Mat responded.
Mat Oxley
Mat Oxley – @matoxley
I agree up to a point. JL was involved. Rude gesture to VR on Sepang podium. Then tried to play part in CAS process
----
Well, Lorenzo already apologized for thumbs down (a reaction to a booing crowds, but still ok no excuse, I'm glad he took responsibility).
About CAS, it was his right (according to Kropo) as he had a stake. As much as VR had a right to appeal. So there is no guilt in exercising one's rights.
Edit: clicked on 'Prophet's' account. Looks like someone from Indonesia. So anybody want to come forward?
.
Really? Division 1 Superkarts use 250GP engines and I've heard nothing of any parts shortages. I never got to drive a Div 1, the closest I came was racing my Div 2. (Single cylinder 250).
Cool thanks for the tip.