This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Noyes Why Rossi Was Slowest and Wins

Joined Feb 2007
6K Posts | 58+
Rovrum S,Yorks Eng
As we wait for the start of this weekend’s Grand Prix of Spain at Jerez de la Frontera, let’s take a look at something that has gotten a lot of attention in the European press -- the fact that Rossi’s winning Yamaha was dead last in top speed at the Grand Prix of Qatar. The postponement of the Japanese Grand Prix has given us a lot of free time to ponder the anomaly of Losail where Rossi won on the slowest MotoGP bike on the grid.

It is unusual for the winner of a Grand Prix to record the slowest top speeds of all competitors, but that was the case when Valentino Rossi won the Grand Prix of Qatar on his FIAT Yamaha on April 11.

However, speeds recorded by eighth-place finisher, Colin Edwards on the satellite Monster Yamaha team Tech3 do not support the theory that the 2010 Yamahas are drastically short on power. Jorge Lorenzo, Rossi’s teammate, on his virtually identical Yamaha M1, was ninth fastest of the 17 riders but managed to finish second while American rookie Ben Spies was 14th fastest in a straight line en route to finishing a strong fifth.

A quick comparison for the top speeds down the Qatar straight shows that Rossi’s Yamaha was slower than the other three Yamahas in the race and a nearly 10 kmh (6.2 mph) slower than the fastest of the Ducati Desmosedici and Honda RC212V machines. Here are the fastest five and other top finishers:

1. Hector Barberá (Ducati) 202.17 mph
2. Andrea Dovizioso (Honda) 202.05
3. Nicky Hayden (Ducati) 200.62
4. Casey Stoner (Ducati) 200.31
5. Dani Pedrosa (Honda) 199.94

6. Colin Edwards (Yamaha) 199.94
9. Jorge Lorenzo (Yamaha) 199.50
14. Ben Spies (Yamaha) 197.33
17. (and last) Valentino Rossi (Yamaha) 196.89

Rossi’s team explained after the win that the Italian’s Yamaha had been over-geared in preparation for a likely battle with Australian Casey Stoner, starting from pole on the powerful Ducati Desmosedici. The idea was that the only way Rossi could stay in touch with Stoner would be by slipstreaming.

A look at Rossi’s top speed in relation to circumstances on track indicate that this was the case. On lap 1 Rossi took the lead on the back section and led onto the home straight but was passed very easily by Pedrosa on the Repsol Honda after the start/finish line. Rossi’s Yamaha running at the front went through the speed trap just before braking for Turn 1 at only 192.6 mph with Pedrosa blasting past and posting a speed of 198.3 mph, while Stoner, running in the slipstream of Hayden on his identical Ducati, was fastest of the leaders with a speed of 199.9 mph.

On the next three laps Rossi, always sitting in the slipstream of Pedrosa ran quicker top speeds in the 196-mph range, always losing about 3 mph to the Spaniard at the end of the straight.

On laps two, three, four, and five, before Stoner crashed out while leading, Rossi was in the slipstream of the Honda. However, when the Australian crashed his Ducati, Rossi had broken free of Pedrosa who, in turn was passed by Hayden. At the start of lap 6 Rossi’s M1, with no draft, ran 194.4 mph. Hayden closed the gap dramatically with a run of 200.7 mph, but from that point on Rossi used his advantage around the rest of the circuit to hold off all challenges from Hayden, Andrea Dovizoso (Reposl Honda), and eventually his teammate Lorenzo.

Rossi’s Yamaha was, as the team said, clearly over-geared. Lorenzo, as he pushed past both Hayden and Dovizioso on laps 20 and 21, turned top speeds of 198.8 and 199.5 mph and lap times of 1´56.295 and 1’56.426, but Rossi, now leading by almost two seconds, actually turned quicker lap times of 1’56.043 and 1’56.228 in spite of running top speeds of only 193.7 and 194.4 mph on those two laps before backing off slightly on the last lap to take his first win of the season.

Stoner was a huge favorite going into the race at Losail where he had won the season opener each of last three years. He had been fastest at Qatar at the preseason and had dominated practice and qualifying.

The situation going into the Sunday night race was reminiscent of the situation at Laguna Seca in 2008 when Stoner seemed to have a huge advantage. On that occasion Rossi rode an extremely aggressive race, throwing the Yamaha in front of Stoner’s Ducati at every opportunity in a desperate attempt not to let the Australian gain enough breathing room to be able to administer the Ducati’s advantage in acceleration. That race is most famous for Rossi’s dangerous overtaking at the Corkscrew when the Italian put both wheels in the sand but managed (with more than a little luck) not to crash and take Stoner out with him.

On lap 24 of 32 Stoner had a soft crash at turn 11 when Rossi braked a bit early with Stoner right up his pipes. He managed to remount and finish, but well back (13 seconds) and the loss was demoralizing for Stoner and his team because it was, and he readily admits this, a race he should have won.

So was Qatar, but Stoner seemed upbeat after the race when he spoke to the press. He believes that he crashed because he started to let up and unloaded the front a bit when he realized he had over a two second lead. In the T1 sector of that lap he set his quickest time for the sector, but, having had a couple of moments when the front had tucked, he had decided to take wider lines. I recall a similar and very plausible explanation for a similar crash by Rubén Xaus on the factory 999 at the World Superbike race of 2003 at Laguna Seca. Xaus had broken away from all comers and was on his own -- then decided to let off just a bit and lost temperature in the front tire and crashed at turn 11.

Whatever the reason for the crash, Stoner was clearly pushing to keep Rossi out of striking distance and, until the crash, it looked as if he had the pace to do it, helped by the long straight and high-speed corners.

How would that all have played out if Stoner had not crashed? The answer to that question is impossible to know, but, as we look at the top speed data, it seems that Rossi and his crew, led by Jeremy Burgess, had a strategy. And Stoner and his crew (led by Christian Gabarini) must have known that Rossi would be dangerous if he could stay in the slipstream of the Ducati.

A look at the data from Losail indicates that, while the factory Honda RC211Vs and the Ducati Desmosedici were faster than the Yamaha M1s, the fact that Rossi’s bike was the slowest of 17 bikes was due to a gearing decision rather than a lack of power.

Besides, how important is top speed in MotoGP? The bikes certainly spend a lot more time in getting through corners than the final 200 yards of the home straight.

more
 
This article sounds like i wrote it. Iv pretty much hav said evrrything in it a few times on the forum. I guess im not the Rossi hating monster some think after all, eh.
 
I usually enjoy Noyes' work. This one was a snoozefest but the last two about the MSMA's lack of direction and unity were quite enthralling.
 
8-9mph on the straight has got to be worth at least a second in qualifying IMO, would be interested in others thoughts.

The gearing obviously gave vr the advantage in the turns, big risk to take or maybe not? IMO jb and vr don't consider many things they do as risky anymore......
 
All this technical jargen. I have a theory (its probably wrong there's probably a rule). Well actually its probably not a theory at all its probably a pile of vile (hey i'm a poet and i didn't know it
<
).

Rossi ran out of fuel half a lap into his victiry lap right. He was recording the slowest times. He'd been geared up for a fight with Casey so would have to use his slip stream. Which i don't get.
Now back to the slipstreaming - lorries do this on the motorway behind another lorry to conserve petrol even though slip streaming is allegal and dangerous.

Rossi was slip streaming cause they'd only put half a tank of petrol in to make him lighter, they're saving some money so they can can celebrate at the end of the year or the next italian gp where he'll have a fireworks display when and if he wins or buy him a decent retirement gift at the end of the decade.

I don't know but i reckon the fuel, the slowest laps are all connected?!
<
 
I think Rossi wins more through consistancy, then a fast lap time, anyone can bang out a fast lap. I'd put my money on Capirossi if were talking 1 fast lap, he can be blistering! But over say 5 laps his times will be all over the place, where as Rossi, would be consistant lap after lap after lap.
 
rossi wins cause he knows how to get thru a turn better than anyone else as well as the best racecraft ever.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Talpa @ Apr 29 2010, 02:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>8-9mph on the straight has got to be worth at least a second in qualifying IMO, would be interested in others thoughts.

The gearing obviously gave vr the advantage in the turns, big risk to take or maybe not? IMO jb and vr don't consider many things they do as risky anymore......
More like a couple of tenths, if that much.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Apr 28 2010, 10:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I usually enjoy Noyes' work. This one was a snoozefest but the last two about the MSMA's lack of direction and unity were quite enthralling.
Could it be you didnt like it because it blows holes in your theory on the BMW superbike. Everyone tried and tried to tell you that power delivery and gearing were more important than big high end numbers on a race track
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (frosty58 @ Apr 29 2010, 02:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>rossi wins cause he knows how to get thru a turn better than anyone else as well as the best racecraft ever.

Thats the one ,brother.
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (frosty58 @ Apr 29 2010, 09:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>rossi wins cause he knows how to get thru a turn better than anyone else as well as the best racecraft ever.
That goes without saying, but if Stoner had kept it on 2 wheels, it would have been a blow out. Stoner was beating him just about every where, not just on the straights.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (povol @ Apr 29 2010, 04:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>That goes without saying, but if Stoner had kept it on 2 wheels, it would have been a blow out. Stoner was beating him just about every where, not just on the straights.

True. And IF my aunt had junk, she'd be my uncle.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (povol @ Apr 29 2010, 07:05 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Could it be you didnt like it because it blows holes in your theory on the BMW superbike. Everyone tried and tried to tell you that power delivery and gearing were more important than big high end numbers on a race track

For some reason you can't differentiate between homogenous top speed and lowest lap time. The BMW should be fastest in a straight line by a country mile b/c the S1000RR lump easily produce 240-250hp which would give it 30 hp advantage over other competitor like Suzuki and Ducati. I've never said it should win.

Hooking it up is important b/c all MotoGP bikes make roughly the same amount of peak power. Why? MotoGP is limited to 800cc, 21L of fuel, and 6 engines per race season. WSBK is 10cc higher than the 990cc formula and it has no fuel regulations or engine regulations of any kind. Have you ever seen an expose about the science behind WSBK and how all of the bikes go the same speed? I haven't. All I see are journalists who serve Kool Aid to the masses and never ask questions.

This is the closest I've ever seen to investigative journlism. This is Steve Atlas in "World Superbike vs. MotoGP" on February 11th, 2010.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE ("Steve Atlas")<div class='quotemain'>I had a chance to ride all the World Superbike machines in Portugal following the final race of the season recently and came away extremely impressed, as the rules allow modifications that not only keep the playing field even but make for some seriously trick motorcycles. That said, instead of technology being the forefront, Infront Sports (company in change of running WSBK) has aimed to produce the best racing on the planet, and judging by the varying levels of tune on some bikes, we wouldn’t be surprised if some rule bending was allowed to even things up. But is this really a bad thing?

Who has referenced the MSMA memorandum to the FIM about an SBK non-aggression pact? Who has done all of the theoretical horsepower calculations? Who found the FIM homologated rev limit? Who found out the rev limit is 13,300rpm for at least 2 manufacturers?

I don't drink the Kool Aid b/c it doesn't taste right. It doesn't matter b/c I can enjoy the racing without the illusion of "blue skies" engineering. You cannot. That's why you whine about my theory.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (steeeeeve @ Apr 29 2010, 11:41 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>True. And IF my aunt had junk, she'd be my uncle.
Or an extremely weird aunt
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Apr 29 2010, 12:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>For some reason you can't differentiate between homogenous top speed and lowest lap time. The BMW should be fastest in a straight line by a country mile b/c the S1000RR lump easily produce 240-250hp which would give it 30 hp advantage over other competitor like Suzuki and Ducati. I've never said it should win.

Hooking it up is important b/c all MotoGP bikes make roughly the same amount of peak power. Why? MotoGP is limited to 800cc, 21L of fuel, and 6 engines per race season. WSBK is 10cc higher than the 990cc formula and it has no fuel regulations or engine regulations of any kind. Have you ever seen an expose about the science behind WSBK and how all of the bikes go the same speed? I haven't. All I see are journalists who serve Kool Aid to the masses and never ask questions.

This is the closest I've ever seen to investigative journlism. This is Steve Atlas in "World Superbike vs. MotoGP" on February 11th, 2010.



Who has referenced the MSMA memorandum to the FIM about an SBK non-aggression pact? Who has done all of the theoretical horsepower calculations? Who found the FIM homologated rev limit? Who found out the rev limit is 13,300rpm for at least 2 manufacturers?

I don't drink the Kool Aid b/c it doesn't taste right. It doesn't matter b/c I can enjoy the racing without the illusion of "blue skies" engineering. You cannot. That's why you whine about my theory.
The last time i checked, you are the only one whining because no one was buying your theory. And for the last time, it is NO secret that took your 007 investigative skills to find that BSB EVO class has a rev limit, its written right in the rule book
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (povol @ Apr 29 2010, 09:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>The last time i checked, you are the only one whining because no one was buying your theory. And for the last time, it is NO secret that took your 007 investigative skills to find that BSB EVO class has a rev limit, its written right in the rule book

I'm whining b/c people love the taste of the Kool Aid. I guess it's not going to kill anyone so maybe I should just let them drink it.
<


I didn't find out that BSB Evo has a rev limit. I found out that the FIM homologated rev limit for the Honda and the Suzuki is 13,300rpm which happens to correspond to the horsepower figures and the top speeds the bikes produce.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Apr 29 2010, 01:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I'm whining b/c people love the taste of the Kool Aid. I guess it's not going to kill anyone so maybe I should just let them drink it.
<


I didn't find out that BSB Evo has a rev limit. I found out that the FIM homologated rev limit for the Honda and the Suzuki is 13,300rpm which happens to correspond to the horsepower figures and the top speeds the bikes produce.
In what series.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Apr 29 2010, 01:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I'm whining b/c people love the taste of the Kool Aid. I guess it's not going to kill anyone so maybe I should just let them drink it.
<


I didn't find out that BSB Evo has a rev limit. I found out that the FIM homologated rev limit for the Honda and the Suzuki is 13,300rpm which happens to correspond to the horsepower figures and the top speeds the bikes produce.



have learned that the FIM homologated rev limit for the Suzuki GSXR-1000 is 13,300rpm. I have learned that the FIM homologated rev limit for the Honda CBR1000RR is 13,300rpm. This information has been obtained from a BSB Evo Suzuki rider, and a Honda Evo engine builder.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (povol @ Apr 29 2010, 11:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>In what series.

It's an FIM homologated rev-limit so it applies to WSBK and BSB and any other series that uses FIM homologation procedures. Whether or not they enforce it in WSBK is a debate worth having, hence my obsession with the nearly identical acceleration and top speed across all brands.

I guessed the FIM rev limited existed before I even read the BSB Evo rulebook. I was only 100rpm off. That's how freakin' easy it is if you do the math and you understand the progression of events that have occurred since 2003.

Didn't I say sliding scale since 2004 which would have been 13,200rpm? I found out that the FIM homologate the Suzuki and the Honda at 13,300rpm. That rpm level corresponds almost perfectly with the top speed data from the last couple of years. A week after I proposed this theory, Max Biaggi was on the record talking about how Aprilia had finally achieved the normal performance gains from 2009 to 2010.

Every time someone accuses the Aprilia of being a bit fast in a straight line Biaggi is like "No no please believe me the bike is fast in the corners. We are only the same as everyone else on the straight".
<


WSBK even has explicit performance indexing in the rulebook for the Ducati, and yet people still insist that the Flamminis would never do anything to make all of the 1000s the same.

No, instead, I must be insane.
<


I bet my theory is only scraping the surface of all of the things they do during homologation to keep the bike production relevant.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (povol @ Apr 29 2010, 10:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>That goes without saying, but if Stoner had kept it on 2 wheels, it would have been a blow out. Stoner was beating him just about every where, not just on the straights.
IF i had wagon wheels i'd be a wagon
 

Recent Discussions