One of Nicky's biggest fans, but MotoGP legend?
I guess for me I put legend pretty high on the mantle.
I'll get flack for this because as an American I should automatically say yes, well deserved, it's about time!
I know everyone in the MotoGP paddock and press corps respect Nicky, but do they think he's a legend because he's a nice guy and works hard?
Yes, he has one world championship in the premier class, but there are a lot of guys out there with no world championships that could probably be put closer to legend status.
Don't know, feels cheap to me.
....Flame away!......
I don't know the answer to this, but is there any rider who has won a championship that is not a legend? Also, How many riders who never won championship are legends
Where does this put Dani's career
Nicky is not a MotoGP legend. A noteworthy rider of course but that's it. I agree with Jum. This is DORNA. They have their reasons.
Guess it depends on what math you use to arrive at "Legend".
Schwantz "only" won a single championship. Yet there are few who'd argue that he's not a GP legend. For serious fans of this sport - it's not about the numbers. There are certain riders who capture the hearts of the fans whether because of riding a ...... RG like Schwantz did for much of his career and being competitive despite it, or riding injured like Schwantz and Doohan did so often or in general - being the underdog - there are so many factors that we admire the hell out of. I think for sure that Nicky falls under the category "Legend" because of the underdog factor, his being on the Honda as the understudy and R&D parts donkey, with Repsol giving all their attention to Puig's prodigy. It's more than simply winning races. We go to the track not just to see who beats who or what company spends the most money. We go to be entertained. 2006 captured everyone's attention with the unproven Superbike kid from the sticks going up against one of the all time favorite riders in the world. The fact that the season was so memorable and drove so much controversy would also have to be a factor. So - my vote is a solid yes.
Kesh, to me a legend is all about results and just as I felt with CS, Nicky has not achieved enough in pure results terms.
At the time CS was inducted I stated that I felt that a minimum of 3 World Titles is the starting point for a legend (barring a career cut short for injury) as this level of results shows longevity and high achievement across a lengthy time.
People should not (IMO) be a legend because they are a nice guy or because they underachieved due to equipment (some would or could argue that they did have good equipment for a while and still achieved little).
Now, we are talking MotoGP Legends here as well, not motorcycle racing legends and if we go down the path of inducting Nicky than every single MotoGP or 500cc (as that seems to have been drawn into the MotoGP titling) champion must be inducted
The sports true legends should not have their records adjudged against riders who are inducted for popularity reasons (either their own, or the organisers)
I think that this is a ploy to keep American viewers interested as soon there will be no American riders.
Hayden is a decent rider. What are the criteria to be a legend?
"well, we got rid of all the american riders, and are slowly getting rid of the american tracks...the least we can do is put nicky in the hall of fame."