This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Michael Scott: An Oasis in a Sea of Sh*t

Joined Oct 2006
25K Posts | 4K+
Your Mom's House
* At an Austin MotoGP meet-up with friends, (some of which are members here and will remember) our friend Levi Garrett said of Austin, Texas: "It's an oasis in a sea of ....." He said this in response to me commenting in admiration on how refreshingly surprised I was with Austin.

A friend of mine sent me the following article by MotoGP 'journalist' (not in quotes) Michael Scott. (Who I believe is a member of this forum).

This piece is a refreshing surprise, an admirable, candid, and quite likely hazardous to the author, considering the report of Dorna forcing a reporter to destroy an interview with Mike Webb after the Argentine debacle that demonstrates the organization's totalitarian type management of information. This article IS, borrowing from the words above, 'an oasis in a sea of .....' Thank you Michael Scott.

In The Paddock - Cycle News

The Paddock
Michael Scott | April 24, 2018
Destroying The Sport – And How Not To Do It
COLUMN

Maybe the most penetrating comment in the continuing fall-out surrounding Argentina’s Marquez-Rossi clash was one of the simplest, from an American reader. That if Marquez hadn’t have done that (knocked Rossi down with a botched overtake), then he wouldn’t be Marquez.

There is a corollary.

That if Rossi hadn’t played his “aggrieved innocent” game afterwards—all laughing charm and injured propriety—then he wouldn’t be Rossi.

In the same way, if Valentino hadn’t have done something achingly similar to Sete Gibernau at Jerez (although by good fortune Sete didn’t crash), he wouldn’t be Rossi, either.

To say nothing about the more recent time that he did push Marquez off and into a crash at Sepang in 2015. I note that back then he didn’t accuse himself of “destroying our sport”—the imprecation he hurled at Marquez directly after the race at Termas de Rio Hondo.

Nor did he apply the same sanction to Zarco—whose very similar move at the same corner actually left Pedrosa with a fractured wrist; nor to Petrucci, a frequent “destroys our sport” offender who clouted Espargaro’s Aprilia during the Argentine race.

In The Paddock | COLUMN | Destroying The Sport
To be fair to all of these sport destroyers, in Argentina it was very easy to stray off a narrow dry line onto a damp patch, making some collisions inevitable.

With Rossi and Marquez, however, it’s different. And very personal, in a cold war in which the older rider has history on his side, and all the best propaganda.

Where he loses out, of course, is because his career path, unlike that of Marquez, is past the crest and on the downhill slope. Contributing no doubt to an unavoidable bitterness.

It’s amazing how Rossi at 39 can still find the motivation to be competitive on the track. Yet his greater accomplishment is driven by charm. His public persona is flawless. He can’t put a foot wrong. In the commercialized world of MotoGP, that makes him the champion even when the young pups do beat him.
As a consequence, the man many regard as the GOAT gets away with playing both sides against one another and still emerges as not just the moral victor, but also takes 99 percent of the sympathy vote.

Marc was to be called up in front of Dorna at the GP in Austin. He will probably have escaped punishment beyond a “calm-down” talking to. Even though Kevin Schwantz, for one, called for a threat of a season-long ban should he do it again.

But the booing of vociferous Rossi fans when (as is inevitable) Marquez wins most of this year’s remaining races will be redoubled. And Valentino will smile beatifically while admiring the sea of yellow, each garment another little ker-ching in his bank account—the same smile he wore while telling the adoring TV cameras about his terrible ill-treatment at the hands of Marquez in Argentina.

It’s impossible not to admire Marquez’s speed and commitment in Argentina. He was streets ahead. An ill-judged (and ill-policed) error on the starting grid meant he had already served a ride-through, while an ill-judged overtake on Aleix Espargaro earned him a “drop-one-place” penalty (he in fact dropped two places, just to make sure). And even so, thanks to his special deal with the laws of physics, he’d come all the way through to challenge Rossi for sixth.

I don’t want to come over as blindly approving of Marquez’s manic move on Rossi, when he could clearly have waited until one or two corners later with less risk. But I do believe it was a genuine mistake—locking up the front and consequently running wide onto a wet patch. And he was punished: by 30-seconds, which dropped him from fifth and out of the points.

But I am surely not alone in thinking that Rossi’s response was overblown, manipulative, callous, and ultimately beneath the dignity of a great sportsman.

Rossi has a lot of people singing in his chorus. Consider this from Italian racing Svengali Carlo Pernat (with high-level past involvement not only with Rossi but among others also Biaggi, Capirossi, Iannone and the multi-titled two-stroke Aprilia effort). Pernat wrote on the Italian website GPOne that Marquez had done “a really dishonorable thing. Now Marc has everyone against him and they are scared to be hit by him… Dorna should disqualify him for one race and if it doesn’t it will cast a shadow over the whole championship.”

Really?

I hereby urge the opposite.

Marc should be left to ride as he does. Rossi should cast his mind back to his own youthful transgressions.

And the rest of us should celebrate that for all the PR speak, the TV slush and commercialization, bike racing is as tough as ever it was, and will ever remain so.CN

If you live in a glass house don't throw rocks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 people
Very good article. I agree with most of it, but not the rather absurd conclusion that "Marc should be left to ride as he does". He needs to rein his behavior in. The clashes with Espargaro, Syahrin or Rossi could've been very serious.
 
Very good article. I agree with most of it, but not the rather absurd conclusion that "Marc should be left to ride as he does". He needs to rein his behavior in. The clashes with Espargaro, Syahrin or Rossi could've been very serious.
Fair enough to demand ALL riders ride cognizant of the dangers inherent to the sport as well as be scrutinized equitably; however your premise seems to be Marc is riding particularly dangerous, your objection to "ride as he does". This could very well be read as "ride as they do". Which rider should cast the first stone?

Marquez is riding fine, he didn't do, in his words, "anything crazy" against Rossi at Argentina, but rather the reaction, or I should say 'overreaction' has been disconnected from the actual incident. You didn't read journalists smugly castigating Rossi, a man of much experience, to have made such a boneheaded torpedo on Stoner (a man for which he had history, like Marc/Rossi and motivation to prove some point) in similar conditions, and labeling him disrespectful reckless, arrogant, blinded by visions of glory, did you? Rather they encouraged Rossi to shake it off, mistakes happen in sketchy conditions, 'carry on as you were' ("ride as he does"). Yet in a similar rather parallel incidents Marc has been labeled dangerous, ban worth, needing to be sat down like a child to be scolded. Friend, i disagree with your premise.

If you live in a glass house don't throw rocks.
 
Last edited:
Very good article. I agree with most of it, but not the rather absurd conclusion that "Marc should be left to ride as he does". He needs to rein his behavior in. The clashes with Espargaro, Syahrin or Rossi could've been very serious.

There's you with your hypocritical double standards.

No mention of the Petrucci incident which Espargaro said was far worse.
 
There's you with your hypocritical double standards.

No mention of the Petrucci incident which Espargaro said was far worse.

The article discussed the Rossi-Marquez dynamic. Unlike you, I can stay focused on topic. Also unlike you, I understand that those two assertions are not mutually exclusive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The article discussed the Rossi-Marquez dynamic. Unlike you, I can stay focused on topic. Also unlike you, I understand that those two assertions are not mutually exclusive.

Don’t fry his remaining 20 brain cells with logic.
That’s all he has left after that lobotomy that kept him from posting for months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The article discussed the Rossi-Marquez dynamic. Unlike you, I can stay focused on topic. Also unlike you, I understand that those two assertions are not mutually exclusive.

But all these things are relevant. They're relevant because one rider is being targeted for doing the same or similar things as other riders on the grid who aren't vilified for their actions. The article quotes an Italian saying Marquez has done a dishonerable thing, not because he hit Espagaro or anyone else but only because he hit Rossi. What Zarco did to Pedrosa that very weekend was worse, the way Rossi manipulated the media immediately after was far more dishonerable than anything Marquez has ever done. The hysteria from Argentina doesn't have anything to do with any other incident. If Marquez hadn't have got up the inside of Rossi despite touching others the headlines would be about the 3-4 seconds a lap he had on everyone else.

You're a guy that believes that Marquez deliberately slowed Rossi because Rossi told you so, maybe your opinion will always biased.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Marquez, the rider of a generation, will continue to dominate the sport and will never get the recognition he deserves because, at the apex of his career you desperate houseslides are too busy directing undeserved attention at an irrelevant rider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
You're a guy that believes that Marquez deliberately slowed Rossi because Rossi told you so, maybe your opinion will always biased.

Does the “P” stand for pot?
Because you just called the kettle black.
 
You do Krav Maga, we both know you need the safety of a computer screen. :giggle:

You have an open invitation to bring your Man on Man Action to Misano.
Just a small tip, in the real world you can’t tap out of a choke.
 
Don’t fry his remaining 20 brain cells with logic.
That’s all he has left after that lobotomy that kept him from posting for months.

What dynamic is that. The dynamic of why one factory rider is in 2nd place after 3 rounds, despite getting no points in one, and the other factory rider is in 7th behind satellite riders ? That would be interesting. I wish someone would discuss that.
I guess its too boring. Carry on discussing 50 Shades of Yellow
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I am happy Vinales is feeling like himself again with a bike that works the way he wants. He was on fire in his last season with Suzuki. I would cheer very hard for him if he becomes the champion this year.
 
The article discussed the Rossi-Marquez dynamic. Unlike you, I can stay focused on topic. Also unlike you, I understand that those two assertions are not mutually exclusive.

Actually you brought up Espargaro-Marquez. What I brought up was fair game since he was far more vociferous about the Petrucci incident and wasn't bother by the Marquez incident, whereas you are.

You're a hypocrite who only wants to go on about Marquez and talks out of his ... about the supposed slowing of Rossi at Sepang.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
What dynamic is that. The dynamic of why one factory rider is in 2nd place after 3 rounds, despite getting no points in one, and the other factory rider is in 7th behind satellite riders ? That would be interesting. I wish someone would discuss that.
I guess its too boring. Carry on discussing 50 Shades of Yellow
Seeing as the points are 1 so early in the season 2 very close. I don't think it's an argument worth pursuing. After another 4 races is a good time to make such statements. Cheers.
 
You have an open invitation to bring your Man on Man Action to Misano.
Just a small tip, in the real world you can’t tap out of a choke.

:giggle:

I've seen Krav Maga 'grappling' I don't have anything to worry about at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Actually you brought up Espargaro-Marquez. What I brought up was fair game since he was far more vociferous about the Petrucci incident and wasn't bother by the Marquez incident, whereas you are.

You're a hypocrite who only wants to go on about Marquez and talks out of his ... about the supposed slowing of Rossi at Sepang.

Is it possible that there is someone on the board thicker than #22? It seems so.

Here's some elementary logic: In considering whether Marquez' riding is dangerous, all the incidents he has been involved in are relevant (including his clash with Espargaro).

In considering whether Marquez' riding is dangerous, how hard Petrucci hit Espargaro means .... all.

You're welcome. You're getting a free education.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people