Geonerd
Desert Varmint
- Joined
- May 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,343
- Location
- Southern Aridzona - Hell's doorstep.
Andy Roo
Better than a double espresso!
Thanks, Sir Roo!
3406041358239119
I think a number of things must be considered.
The last 8 races were the Dani show, apart from PI.
But if Lorenzo hadn't pulled such a considerable advantage earlier on he wouldn't have won it.
We can't discount that earlier advantage to make the season Dani's. There are two forms of evidence we must look at, inculpatory (evidence to prove your case, or convict Lorenzo of unworthiness in this scenario) and exculpatory (the evidence that disproves the allegation of unworthiness)
The whole argument is based around the ignorance of the exculpatory evidence, that is to convict we can only use the inculpate to inculcate the incognate of the races that predicate the the time in the United State.
That is ten races to gain the advantage.
I have decided to place it in a poem rather than prose.
Ten versus eight
You can ..........
Over Dani's season performance late
But not shut the gate
Because the early bird got the worm
And prior to dates
in the United States
Lorenzo had his fill
Enough worms for the number one plate.
And only a dill would deny the skill
the resilience and calculation
To withstand Dani's late season exultation
So its a silly post, to criticise Jorge
The last 8 races he had to coast
But just stay on and score points
And at the end of season have the most
So it was the season of the early bird
Who filled his nest before the herd
gathered momentum and chased him down
But it only showed Dani to be a clown.
If he'd started earlier
His smile would be pearlier
Who? The early bird was Lorenzo
And when we look at the species
of this amazing championship winner who has taken two
It is clear he is not a whining late running cuckoo.
Better than a double espresso!
Thanks, Sir Roo!