<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Mar 5 2010, 09:39 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Which I never disagreed with .......
Its the
initiating it with the rear brake I disagree with, keep trying
trying to avoid that now are? we I see.
He's prettymuch doing exactly what I said.
He's not breaking traction with it, he's controlling how much of the traction he is breaking with acceleration. Ie Acceleration/power is breaking it, the rearbrake is controlling that.
( H's not skidding it to break traction as you say should be done
)
Again a technique he very likely got from his young days as a dirt track rider here. As I tried to discuss, but got so much sooking that that kinda got lost.
Who mentioned skidding? - and you yourself earlier said that there was no use of the back brake
whatsoever on the dirt - I can quote this if you wish. Backtracking again Berry?
As Rog said, you should concentrate on reading other peoples posts, instead of punctuating every other word with emotions.
Actually, I fully understand that he's not breaking traction thanks Berry - it takes seconds to reel you in, and throw you back - and you fell for it as usual.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrabbiata1 @ Feb 28 2010, 03:28 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Interestingly today they were discussing during the Superbike Coverage that the Doohan style handlebar mounted thumb back brakes were now widely deployed in adition to the back brake lever in the main to dampen wheelies (in spite of the abundance of electronics)
and as an added control to wheelspin.
Touch a raw nerve here Berry? You seem a tad flustered - or could it be because it seems yer boy Casey uses the rear brake. If I'd suggested this yesterday, as an aid to traction, you'd have ridiculed me again. Feel free to carry on - I'll just post those quotes where you said there is no use for the rear brake at all in any motorcylcle racing - and you weren't just referring to backing in. Go back and look berry - it's all there. (Clue: Nicky's rear 255mm disc posts)