<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrabbiata1 @ Dec 9 2009, 10:30 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>You originally said that the cartoon was, 'nothing less than hilarious' and in a subsequent post
you said you agreed with me saying that you'd 'hardly call the innocent cartoon hilarious though'. Where's the logic there 'babble-phish'? - just more self contradictory bull. In fact you are so contrary you can't even agree with yourself.
You are very arrogant when you disagree - almost on a par with me.
As your head might have cooled down from red hot meltdown by now please take your time to read this again, and please read it carefully this time:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>Who cares what kind of responses you get a hard on from, you went ballistic over an innocent cartoon and that is nothing less than hilarious.
Unless I got it totally wrong in english this sentence does not imply at all that the cartoon were hilarious and that IS the real quote from my post.
I might be arrogant now and then but at least I'm (sometimes) right
You are just arrogant and wrong (most of the times), and two wrongs don't become one right this time either.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'><snip legthy rant>
But all this pales into insignificance alongside your ludicrous observations from the stands at Assen this year concerning Casey Stoner's throttle action, which I invite you all to revisit for its uniquely high comedic value alone, and Jumkie's brilliant responses.
Ah, now things start to make some sense. You've had an issue with me for years and only now came out with it. At least it explains how you cant even read my posts.
As for the throttle action I recommend looking at my signature, it's kind of self explanatory. You might also consider that the observation were of course done at the Assen chicane and that's about as close you get to any track as a spectator. As for the the rest of that discussion, mostly evolving around Ducati's TC check this one out:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>Q: What was the main target to increase performance? To make the bike smoother to ride for Casey or to improve the rear traction or what?
FP: No. I discussed with Casey a lot what we need for the bike, and he was asking for a smoother bike. I'm sure that when we do something for Casey, even the other riders are faster. And that was exactly what happened today. So we never found something that Casey asked us to do that was not also good for the other riders. So we never have a conflict.
Q: Is the goal also to use less traction control and save more fuel so you have more fuel at the end of the race?
FP: Yes, for sure. The engine is smoother, so it is easier to ride and this is a small advantage.
Q: Because you can hear it kicking in a lot less...
FP: That's true.
It's not me hearing and seeing strange things this time, but non less than Filippo Preziosi, published in Motogpmatters. But I'm sure it's all in his imagination too, right? Not to mention what Stoner imagine he does with the throttle.
Still want to go back there?