I always knew there wasn,t something quite right with you Michael, but couldn,t quite put my finger on it until now! hahaha ( can,t see emoticons any more- i think Barry has stolen them!))
The thing is, that unlike most of you , I have had both, so can be objective.
First a 98 wrx ( well long after a turbo Cordia 110kw, and Lancer gsr 147kw) I found to be a great car, best handling i had experienced and impressive acceleration for a budget performance car. When the 2000 4 dr sti first was available in Australia, I bought it. Gunmetal grey with gold wheels......it was a stunner. Not a huge step up from the wrx though, or not the degree of improvement I expected. I had never modified a car before, but had it "chipped". Dyno showed a modest boost from 130 to 150 kw at wheels, but a big improvement in mid range torque. Subaru claimed 206 kw, so only 130 kw at wheels was a bit poor I thought. In 2006, finally evos were sold in Australia at a reasonable price. I bought an Evo 9. It shocked me. It made the sti feel like it had sloppy handling and made significantly more hp......around 160kw at wheels.The sti with chipping still had a stronger midrange, so I had to modify the evo. Full exhaust, bigger fuel pump, remapping........hello, 210kw at wheels, and power everywhere. The power band would start from below 2500rpm and continue till redline 7500rpm. The sti, in comparison had a relatively narrow powerband ( 3200 to around 6000rpm). I had 3 years of bliss, but it was too fast( from a licence-keeping point of view), so unfortunately it went.Every day to work I would put my foot down , just to feel that insane thrust of acceleration, and I would throw it into roundabouts at seemingly impossible speeds, and rip through them. I still miss it.
I know later sti,s had more power and better handling, but ALL the reviews in the past 3 years or so, say the sti still lacks the evo,s handling, corner grip and all-round ability. They are also much uglier. In fact all Subarus have become steadily uglier. The first gen wrx/ sti is fondly looked back to as attractive by comparison. The new liberty/ legacy/ outback has become a bloated, bland coach built with fat americans in mind, the imprezzas are ordinary.Only the new BRZ, built with Toyota seems to be a good car.
Current evos and stis lack power in stock form to compete with updated m3s and porsches, but with modest modifications can be seriously fast cars. However the evo with modest upgrades can attain gtr and gt2 performance for a fraction of the cost. The sti can never attain this level,......it fundamentally lacks the handling abilities of the evo. You don,t need to take my word for it, an internet search will reveal all.
Try this...........
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exmzq0LvWyo[/media]
Yes, I have actually bought a toyota 86, which is the same car as the subaru brz as you know. I actually prefer the look of the toyota. Agree the latter day subaru wrxs are ugly, mainly the front which is what I don't like on the brz, not that I could have got one anyway. The classic WRXs and STis were fine looking cars though.
You obviously have an informed perspective having owned both vehicles, while I have owned neither (a good friend had a wrx), but everything I have read about the cars in factory spec is in agreement with what you say anyway. What I have read also concurs with what roger says though in that the subarus are screwed together a little better, and some say that the base lancer which shows through the awesome technology on an evo is somewhat low-rent.
I am a rear wheel drive man myself in any case. I had one of the mazda 6 mps turbos for a year, which was a very capable car and faster than the XU1s and RT chargers my friends had in my youth, or the GTHO falcons they didn't have for that matter, but found it curiously unengaging to drive. I had one of the alan horsley fettled australian mazda mx5 sp turbos which was a blast, despite the turbo whoosh and the occasional petrol fumes. I also had one of the (australian) capri turbos when they were current, but have philosophical objections to front wheel drive turbos, although the cordia you and another mate of mine had were good for their time.