jumkie just curious if you would be defending cardenas if it was him instead of eslick in this situation.... i know how much you like him...
[ First of all, guys, I must say this discussion is fun(nothing more) and I'm glad I have friends like you guys to shoot the breeze with (which is all this stuff really is), but it serves a very real purpose of creating and maintaining friendships. Why sound so melodramatic you ask? Well when I came home yesterday, I had to put out a personal little fire. I lost some sleep, but this gave me pause for reflection. At which point I realized how UNIMPORTANT these little racing incidents are in the overall perspective of our lives. Apart from trying to solve my little crisis, I also asked myself, why do I spend so much of my free time talking about this ........? The answer I came up with: Because its fun and relaxing for me to talk about racing with friends. That's it. I know the subjects here are not important, but hanging out here with friends is, and that's as good a hobby as any other. ]
Did you rewatch the race with my previous notes Frost?
Sorry to disappoint you buddy. And no, I'm not calling anybody ....... on this one (you know I reserve that for the GP threads).
Look at my original posts, I felt Eslick screwed up after watching it for the first time. My take was that it looked Eslick focused more on messing with Herrin rather than focus on getting the title (something quite unforgivable). Basically I was in agreement with how you see it. BUT... I have flip-flopped. Its funny too, because I got into an argument about this with somebody else, and now I don't have the balls to eat crow and tell them they were right.
Honestly Frost, I've only rewatched race #2 like 8 times, and at every questionable incident, looked at it frame by frame, then a few more times in real time. (Though I haven't rewatched race #1. After watching race #2 I realized much of my initial reaction was based on race #1). I'd like to rewatch race #1, but stupid ....... Speed miss labeled the DSB race as "Superbike". So I erased it thinking I had both DSB races. I then went to watch DSB #1, and guess what, it was the 'superbike' race.
In the final race, every contact (before Herrins crash) was initiated by Josh Herrin in turn 4. This is a FACT (watch the incidents again). I'll say it again, every contact in turn 4 was initiated/caused by Josh Herrin (NOT Danny Eslick). That INCLUDES the now infamous "brake check"--which in reality was a defensive look back to Herrin who had twice previously bumped Eslick on that very same turn. Even in this incident, Herrin bobbles to get as close to Eslick as possible, which is why Eslick looks back, because out of his peripheral, he sees Herrin approaching, closer and closer. Watch this incident again please.
Now the "punt' must be looked at in the light that Herrrin has attempted to bump Eslick at turn 4 several times up to this point. Herrin takes a different line to approach, this time much tighter. Eslick takes a wider line to approach, whereby giving him more drive through the corner. Herrin left a real crease and Eslick took the space. Before you go on any further, let me ask you, did you see the WSBK supersport race? If you want to see a torpedo, check out what Laverty does to Sofagulo. Laverty goes into a space where none exits. how do I know, because if you watch it, Laverty's front tire goes over the curbing because Sofagulo is so tight guarding the line. THIS IS NOT the case with Eslicks outside-inside pass on Herrin. Josh Herrin goes into that turn a bit hot, perhaps knowing that Eslick has beat him to that particular turn all race. Because he goes in a bit hot (keep in mind, he is tighter on his approach than he's been all race) this causes him to leave a crease as he begins to run wide. This is not unusual. Think about this for a second. When you come in extra tight into a turn, what is your likely exit trajectory? Answer: you go wide. The opposite is true if you approach a turn extra wide. Your exit will be tight. Herrin came in tight, Eslick countered entering wide. It follows then that Herrin's line would drift wide (considering his tight entry) and therefore leaving a real crease. Herrin took that space. Keep in mind this was with three laps to go and the championship was on the line.
The only kink in my armor of explanation above is you comparing it to Rossi's move on Gibers in the infamous Jerez race. I wholeheartly agree with you that the move at Jerez is how you describe it. So my only defense in the Eslick/Herrin incident is to say, the wet conditions made this contact look much worse than it really was, the reduced traction resulted in Herrins crash.
In regards to your question, would I defend it had it been Cardenas. You know I don't have that level of impartiality brotha. I suppose I could lie and say, yeah, I would think the same, but everybody would call ........, and rightly so.
So to answer your question truthfully, if Cardenas has made that move, I'd call for his immediate "lynching"! (
JohnnyK) Though in my defense of this gross inconsistency; 1. Cardenas has a history of torpedoing people, 2. He’s an ........