- Joined
- Sep 20, 2006
- Messages
- 22,701
Outrageous behaviour and he should have his racing licence suspended. These deliberate acts of violence on track should be dealt with robustly.
+1
specially the french ...... part, i would have stomped on Sofucklus face till i was wearing socks of dried .... and blood...
Outrageous behaviour and he should have his racing licence suspended. These deliberate acts of violence on track should be dealt with robustly.
sickened by him. i hope for him he won't be on the podium at nürburgring, i'm sure there will be one or two urine filled tetrapacks flying his way
you can easily explain sofuoglus success in the lower classes. its not that his talent is supreme or his work ethic. he just stoops to lower levels.
....... needs to go.too many tragedies in motorcycle racing in general, no need to wait for another one because of one ... that can't be shown the door
Tom, i disagree Sofoglu knows the dangers of racing more than anybody here, his outrageous display is iron clad evidence he does NOT. Yes, hes raced and won titles, this does not mean he understands the dangers. He just used his bike and body to intimidate another competitor. I'd say, not only does he NOT understand the dangerous of his actions (and more than anybody posting on this thread) but it also seems he doesnt understand the spirit of competition.
Just got around to watching it this morning. Inexcusable. What a lunatic thing to do.
I'm not so sure. What more needed to happen to be convinced it was intentional while saying the potential consequence of his behavior was not intentional. (I understand you do agree that his behavior was intentional, just not with the intent to injury). It be a bit like throwing a rock at your face while riding down the road on your bike, then having you crash. I could say, well I didn't mean to make you crash, I just wanted the rock to hit you on the helmet and bounce off. Anyway, probably splitting hairs on semantics here, as I've been in complete agreement of your takes.... I doubt it was a deliberate attempt to injure foret ...
Simon Buckmaster's take on Sofaglu's .... behavior. I agree with everything he said about Kenan's past and his indignant stance, and the penalty he should have received. Intention was clear. In most other incidents, its difficult to assert intention, and sometimes its just a rider mistake, but in this case, Sofaglu tried to headbutt and intimidate Fabien.
http://motomatters.c..._penalty_n.html
I'm not so sure. What more needed to happen to be convinced it was intentional while saying the potential consequence of his behavior was not intentional. (I understand you do agree that his behavior was intentional, just not with the intent to injury). It be a bit like throwing a rock at your face while riding down the road on your bike, then having you crash. I could say, well I didn't mean to make you crash, I just wanted the rock to hit you on the helmet and bounce off. Anyway, probably splitting hairs on semantics here, as I've been in complete agreement of your takes.
Btw, some of the comments were pretty good on the above publishing of Buckmaster's take, with of course one or two lame ones. This is the first blip in the media I've seen. Nothing about it in the Wsbk site. And in reality, motomatters is simply publishing Buckmaster's take, which allows some spectators to voice their opinion. But I'm still of the opinion that the media have failed to properly report this incident and elevate its profile. I haven't read the usual ex champs and journalist writing an opinion piece, so shame on them.
My point wasn't that it was unintentional, but in agreement with you that the straight jacket and padded van possibly needed to be employed.
Sec 50. "We don't know all the facts." WTF!!! They started off ok, reacting startled at what they had just seen, struggling for explanation. But then to tone it down and say, "we don't know all the facts." ....., you just saw all the FACTS you needed to see, and just correctly said, "that's not allowed." These fools should have been calling for a black flag, and nothing less would be outrageous. FAIL.
I think he should have his licence suspended until he has seen a shrink to see if he is mentally stable enough to race.
Sec 50. "We don't know all the facts." WTF!!! They started off ok, reacting startled at what they had just seen, struggling for explanation. But then to tone it down and say, "we don't know all the facts." ....., you just saw all the FACTS you needed to see, and just correctly said, "that's not allowed." These fools should have been calling for a black flag, and nothing less would be outrageous. FAIL.