<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Dec 8 2006, 05:58 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I have to disagree with you guys for totally bashing honda. Although you have a point that they should listen to the riders more and such. But maybe rossi has handed them their ..., but thats the point. Rossi did it, not yamaha. The honda 990 was easily the most successful moto gp bike. And go further back and look what the nsr 500 did. Hona is the best factory and will almost always prduce the best bike. If you look at their main competition in recent years, yamaha, yoiu will find them only really winning titles when a truly gifted rider is forcing it (Rossi, Rainey, Lawson, Roberts).
As for the superbike world, they can argue with the RC30, that more than did its job. Then when it seemed twins were what was needed the RC51 won some titles, and now its 4 cylinders again, the fireblade is doing well also. I am expecting James Toesland to be champ next year. BSB this year has shown HRC to be superior as well. I will admit that i have no idea what goes on in the AMA scene, but the best riders all seem to be riding suzukis. and ducati have underperformed compared to what i would expect.
We're not totally bashing Honda, not even thier bikes. I'm sure eagle will agree that they make some of the fastest race bikes on the planet. The RCV is a prime example. I don't know off the top of my head but I'd wager most of the 990 MotoGP wins were scored by riders on Honda machinery.
The problem is arrogance. It's coming outta HRC's ... like fast racebikes. If your a Honda factory rider, when it comes to development, it's their way, or the highway. Rossi chose the highway. Whether he was successful or not is somewhat irrelevant in this respect. He chose to leave the best factory team in MotoGP because, amoung other reasons, he didn't like the way they think. That was a brave move, but for Rossi, it paid off.
You're completely right when you say Honda has, overall been THE factory to beat for over two decades, but that's not what we're talking about. The attitude of "There's nothing wrong with the bike, you're riding it wrong" is very prevalent at HRC. It might work for them, but I belive they could be even better if they dropped the attitude. It could be the thing that cost them titles over the past two years.
You say that Yamaha only won 500 titles with talented riders, I belive the same could be said for Honda. They dominated in the late 90s, but I belive that was due to Mick Doohan's skill as a racer and developer. Not to say that HRC weren't building fast bikes, but to win titles you need both a talented rider and a decent bike.
As for Superbikes, well, World SBK at least, I can tell you that if JT wins the vice-championship (sorry, you're talking to a Bayliss fan here
) It won't be thanks much to HRC. Like Eagle pointed out before, Ten Kate are an in-house team like AmHonda. They'll only get help from HRC if JT is in a close battle for the championship. Overall, Japanese factories ignore WSB, partly because they want to concentrate on the more prestigious GP crown, and partly because whoever writes the rules over at WSB is a Ducati arse-kisser. The top teams running Japanese bikes in WSB have very little help from the factory, and the only official factory team in WSB is Ducati.