Why doesnt Michelin just come out and say what is fact.They are not competitive unless they have a competition advantage.If everyone is allowed the same number of tires i dont see what the problem is.Michelin should still have the upper hand with the track data they have gathered over the years compared to Bridgestone, unless the .......'s didnt bother taking notes because they thought the advantage would last forever.At this point its a guessing game on which tires to bring to the track,Bridgestone obviously has better guessers.If they do go to a spec tire,how would that process work,bid war,ask Rossi which he would prefer,best tire.Lets say Michelin is chosen as the one supplier for Moto Gp,are they going to spend millions of dollars trying to make the tires any better,no,why would they,everybody could ride around on tires that fell off after 10 laps and it would all be fair.The amazing tires you and i get for those crazy weekend rides we take are a direct result of tire competition in bike racing,If you dont think so,your kidding yourself.Since Bridgestone has done so well this year,i purchased a set of the new BT002 to see what they had and all i can say is DAMN.I have run Pilot Sports and Pilot Power forever and this tire rivals anything out there in my opinion.Bridgestone got me as a customer because of their hard work>Now it is time for Michelin to win me back.In the end, this is what its all about,competition for yours and mine dollars and i think its great.No competition equals no advancement