This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

The arrogance of Roger Edmondson

Joined Mar 2007
8K Posts | 2K+
Texas
John Ulrich has been ranting against DMG for a while know, but it appears as though he has finally stumbled upon the real problem at DMG.

LINK

Edmdondson's only arrogance/negligence was that he thought he could keep all of the same people on board but make them work in a different fashion. The old AMA was rotten from the inside out and that goes for many of the teams as well who cheated routinely (particularly Yosh; but they didn't win by cheating).

I only wonder how JU manages to place himself above the spectre of wrong-doing.

Anyway, he should have read my posts a long time ago.
 
DMG will find out that each year more and more fans of real motorcycling will spend their hard earned money on something else. No one will keep giving it up for a cheater buell and bare bones superbikes.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Sep 30 2009, 01:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>LINK

Ulrich cracks me up.

JRP is a warning that DMG will throw people out for no reason? I guess if you block front runners while making a reality show of an official cursing you out and then releasing in on the world wide web, you might have something to worry about.

I'm not sure I agree whole-heartedly with the suspension of JRP, but DMG do have the right to stop people from shooting reality shows in the paddock. Especially, if the reality show host is walking around the paddock mic'ed up and causing problems.

Plenty of people have been accused of blocking, slagging DMG, and making a mockery of the sport and none of them were reprimanded (other than Mladin who threatened to punch Pegram for riding Topeka
<
)

Due process was violated? DMG are apparently so powerful that they have become a civil governmnent. Sometimes he sounds like such a hippy.

JU is going mad, I'm afraid. The AMA is trying to "get somewhere" in terms of viewers, sponsors, attendance, venues, talent, team profits, rider compensation, etc etc etc. Why is he making this personal?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Sep 30 2009, 03:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I guess if you block front runners while making a reality show of an official cursing you out and then releasing in on the world wide web, you might have something to worry about.

I'm not sure I agree whole-heartedly with the suspension of JRP, but DMG do have the right to stop people from shooting reality shows in the paddock. Especially, if the reality show host is walking around the paddock mic'ed up and causing problems.


Due process was violated? DMG are apparently so powerful that they have become a civil governmnent. Sometimes he sounds like such a hippy.

Hey Lex, why don't we just get rid of all those pesky cameras catching people acting like ........ and abusing their power. Let's see, why don't we start with all those cameras catching cops beat the .... out of people or how about those cameras catching Acorn workers giving advice to pimps (I'm sure Pov will appreciate that one).

Lex you never cease to amaze me, and frankly knowing your political view, scares me.

So you're bright solution to J. R. Page catching an arrogant fool making a complete ....... of himself or busting a rider threatening another one with violence is to get rid of the device that brought this behavior to light? I had already made up my mind a long time ago that 99% of what you say is worthless, but now you're at 99.9%.

Had it not been for Page, we would not have had hard examples of DMG's complete arrogance and abuse of power. But then again, you’d like that. Same goes for your political views, sweep all the previous ...... track record under the rug, don’t show anybody anything was wrong, its un-American, right?

And yes, due process was circumvented, do you still have to ask after plenty of examples? We are talking about racing and the rules and responsibilities between participants and organizers, so don't go trying to compare it to some lofty civil rights movement. DMG has show time and time again that they apply the rules as they see fit and not what is stated, and when penalties or favors given out, its hardly above board. The sanctioning rules have a due process to deal with such complaints or violations, and the point being made is that this protocol has not been followed. Do you understand the most basic issues being discussed regarding DMG?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Oct 1 2009, 09:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Hey Lex, why don't we just get rid of all those pesky cameras catching people acting like ........ and abusing their power. Let's see, why don't we start with all those cameras catching cops beat the .... out of people or how about those cameras catching Acorn workers giving advice to pimps (I'm sure Pov will appreciate that one).

Lex you never cease to amaze me, and frankly knowing your political view, scares me.

So you're bright solution to J. R. Page catching an arrogant fool making a complete ....... of himself or busting a rider threatening another one with violence is to get rid of the device that brought this behavior to light? I had already made up my mind a long time ago that 99% of what you say is worthless, but now you're at 99.9%.

Had it not been for Page, we would not have had hard examples of DMG's complete arrogance and abuse of power. But then again, you’d like that. Same goes for your political views, sweep all the previous ...... track record under the rug, don’t show anybody anything was wrong, its un-American, right?

And yes, due process was circumvented, do you still have to ask after plenty of examples? We are talking about racing and the rules and responsibilities between participants and organizers, so don't go trying to compare it to some lofty civil rights movement. DMG has show time and time again that they apply the rules as they see fit and not what is stated, and when penalties or favors given out, its hardly above board. The sanctioning rules have a due process to deal with such complaints or violations, and the point being made is that this protocol has not been followed. Do you understand the most basic issues being discussed regarding DMG?
Plus 100, Jum. Although I understand Lex's position regarding the "old ama" and need for change... I just don't get why he keeps beating on an indefensible position... DMG's bizarre actions and other-worldly attitudes far outweigh any good their long term plans MAY deliver and I tend to agree with JU... a 26 year veteran with a broad and deep inside knowledge of the sport and its administrative requirements.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Sep 30 2009, 07:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Hey Lex, why don't we just get rid of all those pesky cameras catching people acting like ........ and abusing their power. Let's see, why don't we start with all those cameras catching cops beat the .... out of people or how about those cameras catching Acorn workers giving advice to pimps (I'm sure Pov will appreciate that one).

AMA Pro Racing is a a private for-profit company. It doesn't matter how .... they are, you can slag them of all you want, but they can fire you. The same way your employer can fire you if you violate company policy. JRP isn't an employee so they can only suspend him from competition.

ACORN is a private not-for-profit (I think they are a 501c3 as well) who accept money from the government. They are falling on the sword b/c they want the Federal Government to continue funding their operation.

Apples and oranges. The companies are completely different and so are the circumstances under which they operate.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>Lex you never cease to amaze me, and frankly knowing your political view, scares me.

So you're bright solution to J. R. Page catching an arrogant fool making a complete ....... of himself or busting a rider threatening another one with violence is to get rid of the device that brought this behavior to light? I had already made up my mind a long time ago that 99% of what you say is worthless, but now you're at 99.9%.

Had it not been for Page, we would not have had hard examples of DMG's complete arrogance and abuse of power. But then again, you’d like that. Same goes for your political views, sweep all the previous ...... track record under the rug, don’t show anybody anything was wrong, its un-American, right?

And yes, due process was circumvented, do you still have to ask after plenty of examples? We are talking about racing and the rules and responsibilities between participants and organizers, so don't go trying to compare it to some lofty civil rights movement. DMG has show time and time again that they apply the rules as they see fit and not what is stated, and when penalties or favors given out, its hardly above board. The sanctioning rules have a due process to deal with such complaints or violations, and the point being made is that this protocol has not been followed. Do you understand the most basic issues being discussed regarding DMG?

Jumkie, if you were to take a camera to your workplace to make your own reality show, there is a good chance they would tell you to turn it off and quit taping people. Even if you were trying to catch your boss who was a complete jerk, they would still fire you or have you removed from the office if you didn't drop the camera.

That is their right as a private enterprise.

JRP has the right to challenge DMG's decision to suspend him indefinitely b/c he invested a good amount of money in order to participate in the AMA and he can argue that they have impaired his investment unjustly via quite a few different civil lawsuits.

I said from the very beginning if JRP had half a brain he would have sent the tape to Edmondson with a note detailing his experiences and asking for a change in officiating personnel. Unfortunately, most of the people on the track don't know how to "keep things in the family". If your boss said something terrible to you, you would run to your local paper. You'd fire off an email to someone higher up.

People need to learn the difference between public law and private law. Due process is public law. Private entities are bound by due process or the bill of rights or almost anything else (except for civil rights and other employment law).

Private entities do not have to give you freedom of speech or freedom of assembly or freedom to exercise religion. They don't have to let you bear arms. They don't have to give you a trial. They don't have to obtain a warrant to search company property that they have entrusted to you.

Due process would only apply if the Federal Government had a law that interfered with DMG's treatment of JRP.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Oct 1 2009, 11:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>
<


Jumkie, you're trying to argue that a company should let one of its customers scrutinize its operations and release its findings to the general public. It is a ridiculous thing to say. If you have your own business someday, you will understand. You don't allow people to drum up negative press.

If DMG employed JRP and his film crew to reduce the corruption in the AMA and the information was given to RE privately, we might have a different discussion. Of course, if JRP was hired by DMG to spy on the employees with cameras and they weren't informed about it, I'm sure DMG would get their ..... handed to them in a court of law.

See how impossible it is to run your business according to any ideals? It has to work, and it must generate profit. Perfectionists, idealists, and whiners need not apply.

JU needs to take a vacation until next season.
 

Recent Discussions