<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MigsAngel @ Oct 23 2008, 12:46 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>so the issue cannot just Paul D....
I disagree (but nothing new here). Now let me ask you, has Burgess made a difference at Yamaha?
Well, I think this applies to Rizla Suzuki. I think Denning ran out Hopper, and then Spies. There was no way they thought that keeping their two regulars was a step forward.
Now I will agree with you (news flash) that if Yosh ran a team in MotoGP that they would be competitive. But this would mean they would get rid of the dead weight, and I'd say Denning would be the first one to be axed and replaced with a Schwantz. (But of course this is just dreaming).
Ok, now as far as enginequeers are concerned, yes, of course they have to improve. I'm convinced Suzuki management do NOT have a win at all cost & effort mentality. Just look at their MotoGP record over the last 30 years. Only when they had an extraordinary rider did things look up (and usually short lived). So this is why I think Spies would have been a good fit, that is, it ay have shaken up a few things at the team. Its not like his performance potential was that big of a question either. I've said it, and stand by it, had they tried harder to find a reasonable contract agreement it would have looked up with Spies (young and hungry, & not stupid), but as it stands, they continue to go backwards.