Barry you can 'roll your eyes' all you like. I read that article and fully acknowledge it. But in your fevered and frantic search online to provide a link to bolster your argument you chose to ignore the many features which explain why the back brake and downshift are in fact deployed, and why they are intrinsic to backing a bike in. Yes, here the writer clearly states that use of the back brake to initiate a slide is a misconception - I acknowledge that - but what of the many links I provided that propose the opposite? In point of fact, he even goes on to say:
'I have hit my braking point and have started to initiate the ritual of events. Braking,
downshifting and
dragging the rear brake slightly'.
Whereas I concede that the latter is not used to slide the bike per se, it is nonetheless used in the process.
But what of downshifting - you dismiss that as well Barry, yet from your own link present on your own post:
' Depending on how tight the turn is that you are approaching, you may need to go from fourth or high gear all the way down to second and possibly first.
All shifts should be made in one action'
'
the idea is to bang down your gears and control the rear wheel action with the clutch. If you let it out too fast or all the way, the rear wheel chatters. If you slip the clutch in excess, the rear wheel won’t bite the tarmac enough to cause the rear to slide'.
If need be, I can provide a link to a post a week ago in which you ridiculed this use of the downshift based on one of my quotes. You simply ignore it when you're proved wrong, and just continue to post complete bollocks.
As I say, you also glossed over the links that I provided which point to the use of the rear brake and the downshift, disregard the riders that I have cited who talk of this technique - and in particular the evidence which you asked me to find regarding Nicky's 255mm rear disc. I did and you conveniently ignored it. As always, I am acknowledging what you have posted and as opposed to deploying stupid emotions after every sentence, or unlike you, making outlandish claims regarding my own riding abilities, I will respond.
You have consistently recounted how, and I stress 'with ease', you are able to when slowing for a corner, close the throttle on your 749s, enabling the bike to slide without the downshift or the back brake but simply through deceleration and body positioning. Not only do you routinely accomplish this on the road, but you then prescribe nonchalantly applying the throttle on entry to the turn to further break traction. This people is something that we not only should be doing as road riders, but should be actively doing because Barry does it every time he goes for a ride.
There is no need for me to provide any further links corroborating the use of the downshift and the back break when backing in a bike - as you well know, I've already exhaustively done that, and not only do you completely disregard them, but these are merely dismissed as 'kids skids'.
I'm very pleased that Mick chose to resurrect the Gyro thread, during which you behave in a similar way in spite of the irrefutable and incontravertable evidence provided by at least a dozen members in the know.
The sliding which you are talking about is not strictly backing in Barry, and is exceedingly hard to master. To this avail, The California Superbike School constructed the outrigger bike:
California Superbike School
This is very hard to master. If you read this, you'll find that even Keith Code had trouble, albeit on a race compound, braking traction.
What you prescribe on a road surface Barry, is the preserve of the visionaries of this sport. Riders with such extreme levels of talent that they made it a reality. The only other people who go there are ones such as yourself - complete bullshitters.
So where does a powerslide ie a real mans slide, meet a kid skid? True "backing it in" is where the the racer is on the brakes so hard that the back of the bike gets intentionally really light- If you were to use no rear brake as many "fast" guys such as yourself say you shouldn't, the back of the bike would come up too much - so racers tend to deploy a little rear brake to keep the back of the bike on the ground. They are trying to brake rear-wheel traction with the rear brake while still keeping the bike under control and initiating the turn. Others favour a firmer application to actually induce the slide - but as I said at least a fortnight ago, this is down to personal preference of the racer.
They then chuck the bike into the turn, while trailing off the brakes and while the motorcycle lean increases, roll on the throttle. The racer is basically using the rear brake to temper the slide, and the throttle to control how much spin he puts into the rear tyre - essentially tailgunning the bike with the throttle, similiar to flat-track racing, only flat trackers don't usually use the rear brake so actively because as you said dirt is more forgiving than tarmac.
The introduction of a powerslide allows the back of the bike to rear wheel steer, changes the bikes direction via the slide, as opposed to the even trajectory of the classic line/apex. Then, once the bike is basically turned, it allows the racer to more or less, straighten the bike and really gas it out. Today's high horsepower bikes can spin up while arching through a corner, but with no rear brake to control it, things can go .... up really fast. I have NEVER met an instructor that would advise attempting powerslides on the street, but then I've never heard of a stock production twin that locks up the back wheel upon closure of the throttle Barry.
Interestingly today they were discussing during the Superbike Coverage that the Doohan style handlebar mounted thumb back brakes were now widely deployed in adition to the back brake lever in the main to dampen wheelies (in spite of the abundance of electronics) and as an added control to wheelspin.
Barry are you still adamant that there is no use of the rear brake or the downshift when backing in during the video posted on this thread?