Rossi fans in deep pain

Now Rossi ( ) is getting owned by stoner and after losing in rain to even Daniel Pedrosa a lot of Rossi fans on this forum are left with a tremenduous feeling of pain ( ). It just makes me feel sooo good that from now on I will not even counteracctack when they insult me. I will just have a good laugh . And guess who is the one making this all possible ... STONER, my herooooooo

This one is for all the Rossi fans and those chosing the Rossi fans side

http://www.motogpforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/.....gif http://www.motogpforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/.....gif http://www.motogpforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/.....gif http://www.motogpforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/.....gif http://www.motogpforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/.....gif http://www.motogpforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/.....gif http://www.motogpforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/.....gif http://www.motogpforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/.....gif http://www.motogpforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/.....gif

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ May 21 2007, 03:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>TE i have to say i am amused by your persistence in annoying as many people as possible. But i have to say that although Rossi is behind at the moment and Stoner is riding better, i wouldn't say Vale is getting owned, and i wouldn't be gloating too much because Rossi is never out of it.

Vale has ridden better than most (all except Stoner and arguably Dani) so far this year, and i expect tires and bikes to evolve a lot this season. That teamed with the vary fortunes that bike racing brings would make me think that Rossi is still the favorite. But i might need to change that answer at the summer break.
I think Rossi wil lose anyway. But I respect your view on it. It isn't a dumb view. And I even more respect the fact your fav rider isn't Rossi

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Valentino Is God @ May 21 2007, 03:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Stoner is really not that great he had the bridgestones this weekend but couldnt match CV or Marco. At Qatar and China he has only just held off a bike with a 10mph or more speed deficit to him.
So Stoner could't match CV or Marco like in Rossi couldn't follow rain specialist Dani Pedrosa on equal tyres ?

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ May 21 2007, 03:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Not everyone who likes Rossi is blind. The problem with fans of the best rider in history is that its hard to tell if your dealing with a mindless know-nothing glory supporter or a long time seasoned true sports fan. Rossi has them all routing for him. And given that we are on a motogp forum i would give most the benefit of the doubt. (after you ignore the time they spend trying to convince you that Michelin secretly hate Rossi)
Yes, this is typically Rossi behaviour. When he doesn't win it is always because of his bike or his tyres or his mommy not feeding him enough when he was a child. He will never say it is his own mistake. Watch what Checa said after the race. He said his fall was his own mistake and should ride more carefull next time. Hat off for such a comment. Checa has class. I wonder if Rossi will ever a tenth of Checa's class.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Valentino Is God @ May 21 2007, 03:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Bridgestone used just 1 main compound of wet tyre whereas the michelin people recommended different compounds to honda and yamaha for some reason.

Pedrosa did a wet weather simulation a while back and the smaller weight of the 800 clearly benefited him in the wet!
You are joking, right . Pedrosa has always been terrible in the wet. In the 125 cc and 250 cc also. Don't tell me the weight of the bike is favouring him please . I will just laugh big times with you. And if Michelin recommended different compounds to both Yamaha and Honda, than Rossi may be even more happy to not have used the tyres of Pedrosa. If he would have used the non-recommended tyres he would have ended behind Edwards

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ May 21 2007, 03:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>The thing is Rossi is considerably more gracious than some of his fann, and you shouldn't judge him by them. You also shouldn't judge them by him, because it doesn't really hold out like that.
There is nothing gratious about Rossi, believe me.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Valentino Is God @ May 21 2007, 03:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Elias "fan" how can you say Stoner has class all he has done is whinge at Toni and claim that his bikes speed advantage is not much and not important!
Maybe I will hate Stoner in the future because of the same reason. But untill now I just can't stand Rossi for how he is and he has always been. But seriously, you expect Stoner to say his bike advantage is huge and with other words say yes to Rossi's claim ? That wouldn't be gracious but an act of a complete morron. If Ross iwould have said nothing about it and Stoner comes up with his bike advantage, that would be gracious. Rossi has taken all possibilities away for Stoner to be gracious. Secondly, you don't seem very gracious yourself because you more or less claim Stoner has a bike advantage hinting to that as explanation of Rossi's defeat.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Valentino Is God @ May 21 2007, 03:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>It is more Edwards claim that the ducati is quick than Valentino. Colin is confused though coz he says Stoner's bike is quick as hell but the yamaha is the best as he clearly proved this weekend!

You are hardly gracious as you want to ignore Stoner's bike advantage and put it all down to his "incredible" skill. I will admit as i said in a previous post that Stoner has ridden very well along with Rossi, Hopkins and this week Vermeulen they have been star riders this year so far.
I am not gracious when I don't admit Stoners bike advantage? I just say nothing about anything. Stoner gets on the bike, starts riding and wins. That's all that matters. Not you, me, Rossi or the holey spirit can proof the claim that Stoner has a bike advantage. He is fast on straights, yes, but difficult to handle ... so who has an advantage ? I don't know and I don't care. 18 drivers in the field do also have a bike disadvantage compared to Rossi and they don't whine about it. And I never saw Rossi unhappy because he has beaten those 18 dudes with a worse bike. That's just motorsport. For the moment, Stoner is the best.

And don't tell lies please. Rossi did say the Ducati is the fastest bike he has ever seen.

And didn't Rossi switch to Yamaha to show off and show that the rider is more important than the bike ?