<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bootsakah @ Dec 11 2008, 02:26 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>If Dorna wants to cut cost, why bother with all these silly rules, just run MotoGP SS (supersport). There are currently a number of different Supersport series throughout the world, they could just run their own and simply try and attract the best talent and support.
I don't think they can refer to it as SS b/c WSS already use that moniker. Furthermore, this IS a prototype attempt at WSS. A very poor one to boot.
Why are Ezy and his legion of doom (the Japanese manufacturers) so STUPID?
This ain't the premier class so chances are most of the great design guru are content to work within the confines of certain parameters in the name of cost suppression.
Motorcycle racing is so easy. Why do they insist on screwing it up?!
Hand the manufacturers a torque curve and an HP curve and then give them the line of best fit formula you will use to measure tolerances. Tell them to build whatever they want within 600-650cc & 4 strokes.
Tell the manufacturers to give the electronic ECU specs to the governing body. The governing body hires an ECU company to produce the teams ECU's as they request. Put a little black box on the bike before the race. Any output from the ECU that deviates from the normal settings results in disqualification. The spec ECU could obviously not be used for TC or anything else because it would be recorded on the black box. Once the ECU data is in, engine development is frozen until the next season when they can have a new engine/ECU config approved.
Tell the manufacturers to run their sims at the beginning of every season and to come up with a transmission. That's what they use for the entire season. That will help spread the wins out based upon which track they want their transmissions to suit, or it will allow a small dark horse manufacturer to pick up wins by designing a bike that is strong at tracks where the big manufacturers are relatively weak.
Set a minimum bike+rider weight so midgets don't take over the sport.
Steel brakes. Conventional forks. Chain drive. Conventional rear shock (same old passive suspension when the bike is at full lean).
Change the perfomance specs every couple of years.
The end. Everyone wins.
Manufacturers get to test all kinds of new engine configs, chassis, and design philosophies. The governing body gets to keep performance within reason so tracks don't have to be remodeled every couple of years. Fans get diverse machines and good racing. Riders of many different sizes all get roughly the same equipment. Variations within chassis design allows a team to build around a rider's desires.