Match the quote

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
All well and good until Honda and Yamaha walk away and leave Dorna with a bunch of 'bought ride' riders and bikes that are slower then WSBK's.

Honda will never walk away from GPs. I don't think Yamaha will either. I think it's much more likely that Ducati will abandon MotoGP, as they have their spiritual home over in WSBK.



And the CRT bikes will be faster than WSBK bikes at the same tracks. This year. And even faster after that.
 
Sounds like a pure power play by Ducati, no more and no less and really, this for the manufacturers concerned is not sport but business and in business, one takes each and every advantage they can to cause maximum disruption and disadvantage to their business competitors. All up, a smart business decision by Ducati to 'rock the boat' as it were.



Although, for this minion I do think that the decision to change the weight ruling at a point so close to the new season beginning and when copious amounts of dollars had already been spent by the big two is interesting to say the least of DORNA. On one hand we have an organisation beating their chest and proclaiming 'we must save dollars' whilst then, knowingly changes the rules (or moving the goal posts) knowing full well taht this woudl result in an immediate increase in costs and highlight wasted funds already used.



To me, it smacks of arrogance, a power play and of DORNA saying 'this is our game, we are the boss, you don't like it, then do not let the door hit you on the way out.



This is a business afterall.



With all do respect, several peeps are just ignoring what has been written on the subject, for a recap you can re-read it at motomatters. I get Pov, Mental, etal takes, they come from a place of blind allegiance from wherever Stoner sits (commonly devoid of logic and fact checking), but the situation here is NOT the fault of Ducati or Dorna. If anybody tried to power play here, it sound like it came from Honda & Yamaha. Dorna had a certain interest (CRTs), and hence, they 'proposed' a change in weight. (Contrary to the now debunked conspiracy theory that the weight increase was to help Rossi/Ducati at the expense of Stoner/Honda). Dorna 'proposed' it back in November NOT in December to adopt a new weight regs, it wasn't implemented then because MSMA lied about the vote. It wasn't until the actual minutes were requested that this lie was exposed. It matters not how the lie was exposed, whether it was Ducati telling or the church mouse. Had they been forthcoming, Honda & Yamaha (now whining about last minute with their particular supporters echoing the whine) would have had since the end of last season (the first test of the new season in Valencia) to make adjustments. Why is this getting missed?



Friend, it IS Dorna's "game" (at least partly), as in, they purchased the rights of the show. They promote it, and so have a heavily vested interest. Also, they 'proposed' the new weight, this should be contrasted with the word 'imposed' the new regs, which it seems people are mistaking. The MSMA get to either veto this or agree to it. So as much as I dislike Dorna in many respects, this was not like its being portrayed or by those echoing Stoner's disapproval of the weight regs.
 
With all do respect, several peeps are just ignoring what has been written on the subject, for a recap you can re-read it at motomatters. I get Pov, Mental, etal takes, they come from a place of blind allegiance from wherever Stoner sits (commonly devoid of logic and fact checking), but the situation here is NOT the fault of Ducati or Dorna. If anybody tried to power play here, it sound like it came from Honda & Yamaha. Dorna had a certain interest (CRTs), and hence, they 'proposed' a change in weight. (Contrary to the now debunked conspiracy theory that the weight increase was to help Rossi/Ducati at the expense of Stoner/Honda). Dorna 'proposed' it back in November NOT in December to adopt a new weight regs, it wasn't implemented then because MSMA lied about the vote. It wasn't until the actual minutes were requested that this lie was exposed. It matters not how the lie was exposed, whether it was Ducati telling or the church mouse. Had they been forthcoming, Honda & Yamaha (now whining about last minute with their particular supporters echoing the whine) would have had since the end of last season (the first test of the new season in Valencia) to make adjustments. Why is this getting missed?



Friend, it is partly Dorna's "game", as in, they bought the rights of the show. They promote it, and so have a heavily vested interest. Also, they 'proposed' the new weight, this should be contrasted with 'imposed' the new regs, which it seems people are mistaking. The MSMA get to either veto this or agree to it. So as much as I dislike Dorna in many respects, this was not like its being portrayed or by those echoing Stoner's disapproval of the weight regs.

A full year + after teams were handed spec sheets to build bikes for the 2012 season. They then spent millions building said bikes, only to have Dorna, for who gives a .... what reason, Rossi Ducati CRT, DOESNT MATTER, change the specs costing companies millions in extra R&D. I still dont believe its was as simple as a 2-1 vote and the japs lied afterword, knowing full well that Ducat would rat them out. I want to see the minutes
<
.I can buy that Ducati abstained from voting, knowing full well that the Japs would consider that a unanimous vote. Or that Ducati voted yes but proved it was under duress and wanted to vote no.
 
Pov, look up the word 'propose'. .



Also, counter to the stereotypes u hold dear, Japs can in fact lie.
<
 
Gee you lot are confusing me!



Didn't it go ...........



The MSMA voted and the rule was passed by a NON-unanimous vote ..............



nothing more said............



thus Dorna want us to think it was perhaps a majority vote .............



but Honda came and and said we were the ones against it ...........



now it seems Yamaha are backing Hondda and wantingg to idientify themselves as against it .........



hence leaving it obvious that



Ducati do want 4 extra kg's on the others ........



Though seemingly infair ............ Dorna are doing a deal for Duccati t keep them at least in there.....





is that it to date?
 
Honda will never walk away from GPs. I don't think Yamaha will either. I think it's much more likely that Ducati will abandon MotoGP, as they have their spiritual home over in WSBK.



And the CRT bikes will be faster than WSBK bikes at the same tracks. This year. And even faster after that.

The aprilias will be, but they are relying on trickle down technology from their wsbk effort
<
.



They may be posturing, but yamaha have said in the last few days they will walk if engines are frozen. I agree that racing is in honda's dna, cf mr honda their founder, very much a racing guy, but they have also said similar things.



I gather things are pretty tough in Japan, with record national debt, the gfc and the tsunami/fukushima. Arguably dorna may be saving them from themselves in the long term cost wise, but I think that the late arbitrary weight change is the type of thing if it does lead to significant expense that is hard to justify to corporate bean counters, and indeed makes it hard to argue that they are going to all this expense to compete at the pinnacle of bike racing rather than in some mickey mouse amateur show.
 
With all do respect, several peeps are just ignoring what has been written on the subject, for a recap you can re-read it at motomatters. I get Pov, Mental, etal takes, they come from a place of blind allegiance from wherever Stoner sits (commonly devoid of logic and fact checking), but the situation here is NOT the fault of Ducati or Dorna. If anybody tried to power play here, it sound like it came from Honda & Yamaha. Dorna had a certain interest (CRTs), and hence, they 'proposed' a change in weight. (Contrary to the now debunked conspiracy theory that the weight increase was to help Rossi/Ducati at the expense of Stoner/Honda). Dorna 'proposed' it back in November NOT in December to adopt a new weight regs, it wasn't implemented then because MSMA lied about the vote. It wasn't until the actual minutes were requested that this lie was exposed. It matters not how the lie was exposed, whether it was Ducati telling or the church mouse. Had they been forthcoming, Honda & Yamaha (now whining about last minute with their particular supporters echoing the whine) would have had since the end of last season (the first test of the new season in Valencia) to make adjustments. Why is this getting missed?



Friend, it IS Dorna's "game" (at least partly), as in, they purchased the rights of the show. They promote it, and so have a heavily vested interest. Also, they 'proposed' the new weight, this should be contrasted with the word 'imposed' the new regs, which it seems people are mistaking. The MSMA get to either veto this or agree to it. So as much as I dislike Dorna in many respects, this was not like its being portrayed or by those echoing Stoner's disapproval of the weight regs.

I have to disagree with you on this one.



I agree obviously that it is nothing to do with rossi , mainly to help CRT and with a good rationale from that point of view, and if it peripherally helps ducati that is a bonus with which I have no problem as they need all the help they can get at the moment. It is a shame that dorna did not have the same attitude to ducati in 2007 and 2008 when they proposed nobbling them with a rev limit and did nobble them by taking away their tyre, which may have substantially contributed to them coming to such a pass.



I also agree that if their has been a minor conspiracy it has been by yamaha and honda. However I think they are more sinned against than sinners on this particulalr issue, as I still think it is quite unreasonable to change the weight limit at such a late stage whether in November or December, a year after promulgating a different weight limit to which they had adhered.
 
Kropo, Honda walked away from the AMA over disagreements with DMG executives. The US is a massive market, yet they felt enuf disagreement with the powers that be that Honda America decided staying was untenable. Granted, GP is a greater stage, but people hate swallowing pride (executives being people too). I wouldnt say never. I can imagine a world where Honda would walk away, thought i dont think Dorna would want this to happen. But who knows? Wsbk have managed to live on after Ducati "factory" has left. Not to mention Yamaha in its entirety.
 
Dont forget the initial DORNA proposal was 160kg. It is reported this was in fact rejected by unanimous MSMA vote. How the 157kg got in is not clear but I bet there are a bunch of smug DORNA and Ducati people very happy that Honda and Yamaha being called the liars. Probably these two were under the assumption the MSMA had rejected any weight increase.



I would guess based on recent events DORNA is just fine with the possibility of Honda and Yamaha leaving, they probably think moto2 is the ideal model for the future of motogp.
 
I have to disagree with you on this one.



I agree obviously that it is nothing to do with rossi , mainly to help CRT and with a good rationale from that point of view, and if it peripherally helps ducati that is a bonus with which I have no problem as they need all the help they can get at the moment. It is a shame that dorna did not have the same attitude to ducati in 2007 and 2008 when they proposed nobbling them with a rev limit and did nobble them by taking away their tyre, which may have substantially contributed to them coming to such a pass.



I also agree that if their has been a minor conspiracy it has been by yamaha and honda. However I think they are more sinned against than sinners on this particulalr issue, as I still think it is quite unreasonable to change the weight limit at such a late stage whether in November or December, a year after promulgating a different weight limit to which they had adhered.



Mike, im unclear as to what ur disagreeing with me about. I made no reference to Dornas treatment of Duc 07/08, and again, they only 'proposed' the change not 'imposed' it. So, good sir, where is ur point of disagreement?
 
With all do respect, several peeps are just ignoring what has been written on the subject, for a recap you can re-read it at motomatters. I get Pov, Mental, etal takes, they come from a place of blind allegiance from wherever Stoner sits (commonly devoid of logic and fact checking), but the situation here is NOT the fault of Ducati or Dorna. If anybody tried to power play here, it sound like it came from Honda & Yamaha. Dorna had a certain interest (CRTs), and hence, they 'proposed' a change in weight. (Contrary to the now debunked conspiracy theory that the weight increase was to help Rossi/Ducati at the expense of Stoner/Honda). Dorna 'proposed' it back in November NOT in December to adopt a new weight regs, it wasn't implemented then because MSMA lied about the vote. It wasn't until the actual minutes were requested that this lie was exposed. It matters not how the lie was exposed, whether it was Ducati telling or the church mouse. Had they been forthcoming, Honda & Yamaha (now whining about last minute with their particular supporters echoing the whine) would have had since the end of last season (the first test of the new season in Valencia) to make adjustments. Why is this getting missed?



Jums, I have not overlooked nor forgotten what has been written on the subject and I am a frequent reader of Krop's site and articles as I find them well written, thoughful and extremely insightful with little to no prejudice when it comes to the subject matter. In short, I greatly enjoy his site and spend a lot of time there as it is a site (and of course forum) that is yet to be teh subject of the radical fanaticism and hatred that infests so many other once good sites.



Now, let me ask you why it is not the fault of Ducati?



I ask as you seem to possibly have missed my point entirely in that irrespectivie of who may have been teh 'bully boys' in the past, the current situation of the weight issue was not of their making given teh last minute changes. Now, do you agree that the addition of 4 kilograms to the minimum weight limit was last minute or do you suggest that all manufacturers had ample warning and notice that their machines had to be 157 kg?



This is the crux of the situation as I see it.



The manufacturers agreed at an MSMA meeting in late 2010 as to the minimum weight limit which DORNA put in writing as the standard (irrespective of whether or not the limit was agreeed by all etc). This was then the mandated minimum weight limit and the manufacturers all commenced the ongoing development of a bike for the 2012 season based on that essential and critical component and in all likelihood spent many millions of dollars towards achieving the end goal.



In late 2011 news broke from DORNA that apparently the manufacturers were not in agreement afterall, and as such this opened the door for DORNA to implement (mandate?) their own decision as to minimum weight. This they did quite quickly and decided to raise the minimum weight by 4 kilograms.



Now, as to their reasons for the 157 vs 153, who really knows, but let us take it on good faith (and remove any conspiracy theory as to it being designed to impact one rider or manufacturer) it was well within their right to make that decision .... of this there is no doubt or argument (I suggest).



However, they knew full well that certainly Honda and Yamaha, and quite reasonably Ducati had already spent money on their machines to meet the minimum weight. Now, given the frequent bleatings by DORNA about reducting costs to then have them make a 'late' decision that would result in an increase in costs (along with associated wastage of funds already spent) does seem somewhat contradictory and arrogant.



Now, do I blame them ................ no, for they ARE the boss and they can mandate, dictate and do as they want, as they are the people/organisation in charge.





As for Ducati's involvment and why I believe and posted that Ducati were involved in a powerplay of their own, I will simply ask whether you feel that Honda or Yamaha would have advised DORNA that the decision in question was not unanimous and given taht there are no other particpants, how did the decision leak?



Thus, to me Ducati likely got sick of being on the receiving end and decided to 'dish it out' as it were.



Just because Honda/Yamaha may well have been bully boys and may well have utilised their power does not mean that they cannot be bullied, nor out manouvered, nor have power used against them







Friend, it IS Dorna's "game" (at least partly), as in, they purchased the rights of the show. They promote it, and so have a heavily vested interest. Also, they 'proposed' the new weight, this should be contrasted with the word 'imposed' the new regs, which it seems people are mistaking. The MSMA get to either veto this or agree to it. So as much as I dislike Dorna in many respects, this was not like its being portrayed or by those echoing Stoner's disapproval of the weight regs.



Never said it wasn't DORNA's game and suggest that you misinterpreted the post.



As for the difference between proposed and imposed, there is no difference when a proposal becomes imposed without discussion, it is then dictated or mandated as it has been in this case.



A true proposal would have resulted in the discussion with MSMA (whether or not it would have been fruitful is open) and a better lead time to the imposition of the new weight.
 
Mike, im unclear as to what ur disagreeing with me about. I made no reference to Dornas treatment of Duc 07/08, and again, they only 'proposed' the change not 'imposed' it. So where is ur point of disagreement?





Jum, not speaking for Michael here but I think we (you and I) have a similar point of disagreement.



To me, MSMA in this case had no real or accepted input into the weight increase (from 153 to 157) and whether or not DORNA 'proposed' or 'suggested' the rule, the simple fact that it is now written in teh rulebook means that it was 'imposed'.



From what I have seen, heard and read, there was no open discussion with the parties involved or impacted with regards to the change of minimum weight which, for me makes it an imposed decision



No blame, no conspiracy.
 
The idea that it's Honda and Yamaha's fault for building bikes at 153kg is a bit harsh. Just the same as if dorna would suddenly decide engines are now to be 950cc maximum, it is a rule change that that no one could have predicted back in 2011 when bikes were being developed.
 
Mike, im unclear as to what ur disagreeing with me about. I made no reference to Dornas treatment of Duc 07/08, and again, they only 'proposed' the change not 'imposed' it. So, good sir, where is ur point of disagreement?

Jums, I have not overlooked nor forgotten what has been written on the subject and I am a frequent reader of Krop's site and articles as I find them well written, thoughful and extremely insightful with little to no prejudice when it comes to the subject matter. In short, I greatly enjoy his site and spend a lot of time there as it is a site (and of course forum) that is yet to be teh subject of the radical fanaticism and hatred that infests so many other once good sites.



Now, let me ask you why it is not the fault of Ducati?



I ask as you seem to possibly have missed my point entirely in that irrespectivie of who may have been teh 'bully boys' in the past, the current situation of the weight issue was not of their making given teh last minute changes. Now, do you agree that the addition of 4 kilograms to the minimum weight limit was last minute or do you suggest that all manufacturers had ample warning and notice that their machines had to be 157 kg?



This is the crux of the situation as I see it.



The manufacturers agreed at an MSMA meeting in late 2010 as to the minimum weight limit which DORNA put in writing as the standard (irrespective of whether or not the limit was agreeed by all etc). This was then the mandated minimum weight limit and the manufacturers all commenced the ongoing development of a bike for the 2012 season based on that essential and critical component and in all likelihood spent many millions of dollars towards achieving the end goal.



In late 2011 news broke from DORNA that apparently the manufacturers were not in agreement afterall, and as such this opened the door for DORNA to implement (mandate?) their own decision as to minimum weight. This they did quite quickly and decided to raise the minimum weight by 4 kilograms.



Now, as to their reasons for the 157 vs 153, who really knows, but let us take it on good faith (and remove any conspiracy theory as to it being designed to impact one rider or manufacturer) it was well within their right to make that decision .... of this there is no doubt or argument (I suggest).



However, they knew full well that certainly Honda and Yamaha, and quite reasonably Ducati had already spent money on their machines to meet the minimum weight. Now, given the frequent bleatings by DORNA about reducting costs to then have them make a 'late' decision that would result in an increase in costs (along with associated wastage of funds already spent) does seem somewhat contradictory and arrogant.



Now, do I blame them ................ no, for they ARE the boss and they can mandate, dictate and do as they want, as they are the people/organisation in charge.





As for Ducati's involvment and why I believe and posted that Ducati were involved in a powerplay of their own, I will simply ask whether you feel that Honda or Yamaha would have advised DORNA that the decision in question was not unanimous and given taht there are no other particpants, how did the decision leak?



Thus, to me Ducati likely got sick of being on the receiving end and decided to 'dish it out' as it were.



Just because Honda/Yamaha may well have been bully boys and may well have utilised their power does not mean that tehy cannot be bullied, nor our manouvered, now have power used against them











Never said it wasn't DORNA's game and suggest that you misinterpreted the post.



As for teh difference between proposed and imposed, there is no difference when a proposal becomes imposed without discussion, it is then dictated or mandated as it has been in this case.



A true proposal would have resulted in the discussion with MSMA (whether or not it would have been fruitful is open) and a better lead time to the imposition of the new weight.

The ducati 2007 and 2008 thing is admittedly a red herring, and followed on from my points that I don't think this is rossi related and that I have no problem with dorna doing things to help ducati anyway, but also relates to them imo having made many inconsistent, poorly thought through and ad hoc decisions in the past. I really hope they get CRT to work, but if they do it will be a first for them as far as virtually anything technical goes, and their implementation so far leads me to believe they have not as yet retreated from ad hocery and inconsistency.



My point of disagreement is the same as gaz's, changing the rules a year after honda and yamaha designed and built bikes in conformity with previously promulgated regulations, and tested them for many months for that matter as well, is unreasonable and amateur imo. If the con apparently perpetrated by honda and yamaha was at the time of the initial regulations then it is different and you are correct, but I haven't seen anyone say that as yet.



The subtext to me would seem to be that we have the 1000 formula previously decided on, and a CRT formula devised (in a fairly hasty and ad hoc manner imo) since then being introduced at the same time. I guess dorna see the CRT formula as "their" formula and the 1000 formula as the msma's, but imo they missed the boat on the minimum weight for this year and it should have been brought in for next year allowing the normal reasonable lead time. Perhaps they could have given the msma a choice between acceding to the weight change and some other advantage being given to the CRT bikes for this year if the performance of the CRT bikes so far is of concern, which would seem to be the underlying issue. I certainly don't think that yamaha and honda are worried about the CRTs (or ducati either probably) being given too much competitive advantage by the weight change.
 
Honda will never walk away from GPs. I don't think Yamaha will either. I think it's much more likely that Ducati will abandon MotoGP, as they have their spiritual home over in WSBK.



And the CRT bikes will be faster than WSBK bikes at the same tracks. This year. And even faster after that.



I disagree that they will never walk away. If they are pushed too far then they could easily walk away or at least threaten it. The bigger threat would be if they have the top 3-4 riders signed up and walk away with them as well as their bikes and take them to WSBK. Dorna would be left standing with just their .... in their hand. To think that Honda and Yamaha won't leverage this if they are pushed too far as naive in my opinion.



Sure Dorna owns the game but what do they really own if they have no players to play in the game?



Also I think if WSBK wanted to be faster then CRT then they would be able to achieve it. More fuel, more RPM, less weight and better tyres and they would be there.
 
Also, for Dorna to make CRT's a winning formula they have to get the punters to become emotionally involved with the teams. This is going to be VERY hard to do. It is easy to get punters to be emotionally involved in Honda, Yamaha, Ducati etc because many punters own a bike with one of those brands on it. How does Dorna do this with unknown racing only brands that have no history behind them? They can't! The only thing the punters will get attached to are the riders but what we are seeing at the moment is a half a grid of riders who have no history and have bought their ride. No punter is going to get emotionally involved with that.



Honda, Yamaha, Ducati, Stoner, Lorenzo, Pedrosa, Rossi still hold the power.
 
I disagree that they will never walk away. If they are pushed too far then they could easily walk away or at least threaten it. The bigger threat would be if they have the top 3-4 riders signed up and walk away with them as well as their bikes and take them to WSBK. Dorna would be left standing with just their .... in their hand. To think that Honda and Yamaha won't leverage this if they are pushed too far as naive in my opinion.



Sure Dorna owns the game but what do they really own if they have no players to play in the game?



Also I think if WSBK wanted to be faster then CRT then they would be able to achieve it. More fuel, more RPM, less weight and better tyres and they would be there.

I would love to see Dorna put in their place. The factory prototypes ARE the show, without them the curatin falls. For all the talking heads that are dreaming of Moto 1, all you have to do is go to ANY bike board and look at the difference in discussion between Moto 2 an GP. Nobody really cares, you get 10 -15 lines about Moto 2, good race, yea good race, yea close race, blah blah, and thats it. Quit kidding yourselves, if you really liked that ...., you would spend your time on the Moto 2 forum. , it doesnt inspire you, thats why you are on a GP board, where you can have 5 threads going at once about a gearbox, a computer, the pro and cons of different engine configurations, firing orders and on and on and on. Here is another quote from Yamaha



"Cost reduction is an essential matter," said Masahiko Nakajima, general manager of Yamaha's Motorsport Development Division.



"But if there is a freeze on development - such as you must continue to use the end of 2012 spec engine for three years [similar to F1] - then Yamaha is not interested in MotoGP.



"We go racing to introduce new technology and then feed that technology back to the production bike. For us 'racing is an actual laboratory'."
 
Just the same as if dorna would suddenly decide engines are now to be 950cc maximum, it is a rule change that that no one could have predicted back in 2011 when bikes were being developed.

This is patently untrue. A 2.6% increase in total bike weight, as I have already stated, IS NOT a huge obstacle to overcome and there is relatively little expense solving how to add weight. Yes it is an unexpected curve ball, but not the game ender everyone is portraying it as. In fact in certain circumstances moveable ballast could be seen as an advantage. A change in engine displacement would be HUGE and expensive obstacle.
 
This is patently untrue. A 2.6% increase in total bike weight, as I have already stated, IS NOT a huge obstacle to overcome and there is relatively little expense solving how to add weight. Yes it is an unexpected curve ball, but not the game ender everyone is portraying it as. In fact in certain circumstances moveable ballast could be seen as an advantage. A change in engine displacement would be HUGE and expensive obstacle.

Agree it is not of nearly the same order, but honda and yamaha are best placed to know how expensive it is, and if it was so trivial then presumably they wouldn't be concerned, so your argument is to some extent self defeating. I think it is possible that designing a bike for a formula with ballasting in the rules may be different than adding it after the bike has been designed also.



I think there are two issues. The first is that honda in particular have a chatter problem, which they didn't have in earlier testing. This may be wholly due to the new tyres which pretty well all the riders asked for, but that it is related to the weight change is not impossible. Chatter is an elusive problem, and it is not as though seemingly small changes have never led to major changes in bike behaviour before. I remember the one about moving the fuel tank one or two cm on one of the 500 hondas. The other is that a large amount of testing has already been done. Even if that was expensive more in terms of effort than money (it was probably expensive in both regards), wasted effort however well paid or sustainable financially is frustrating, probably the more so greater the talent and commitment of those involved.
 
Lets face it, almost all of these problems stem from overblown regulations in the first place. Dorna have been working harder than I've ever seen them to make this series truly competitive again. If anyone still feels the biggest factor in succeeding in Motogp today isn't the bike after reading the Yamaha Electronics write up on Crash, then your probably a Stoner fan anyway-which explains it all.........



IMO the reason as to why all of this is getting so sticky is that Ducati have now had to build essentially a Japanese bike to become competitive, due to the Control tyre development being directed by the Japanese giant towards its fellow Japanese manufactures. The Control tyre is stalling development, costing teams and manufacturers dearly, and playing right into the hands of the bigger factory teams. Now more than ever it will be impossible for a Satellite team to win, which of course hasn't happened for years anyway........The control tyre has contributed significantly to the racing being more processional and leaves no room for any well-experienced team to gain ground over a weekend through setting and rubber options. What we see is a linear progression across a race weekend with no real surprises unless it rains or riders crash.



Ducati has proven, by turning their machine upside down and inside out, that even with the most experienced, awarded and successful rider and team in the modern era, you must follow the chassis design of the big two to become consistently competitive-there is no room for innovation-mainly due to the rubber restrictions, hence Ducati played it very well with the vote-and even up the playing field a little for themselves and more importantly (though it probably wasn't their intent) the CRT's. Vito remarked that the use of lightweight materials is a very expensive aspect to building race bikes, the rule is good, the timing of its implementation not so, and the Japanese will just have to suck it up.



At the very least BS has now developed a tyre that might go off during the race, however I still hold little hope for closer action due to the electronics making sure this doesn't effect the way the rider twists the throttle anyway, or what line they take regardless of tyre degradation. Funny thing, Yamaha is not interested in pursuing Motogp if there is a freeze on engine development-yet one of the most important equipment aspects of the series has been in development freeze for 2 years now.........
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top