<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SackWack @ Aug 12 2009, 10:20 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Kallio is going to be on the Factory Duc eh? Wonder how the rookie rule applies to that? So Spies goes to Yamaha Tech 3 and factory rider gets hurt. Does he get promoted to factory ride despite the rookie rule? Or does he just get factory support while on the Tech 3 team while the factory go 1 rider down if they can't get an ex motogp rider in the seat? Biaggi could be back in MOTOGP afterall. Going to be an interesting year next year.
i'm confused
Sacky, a good hypothetical question.
I thought that the rookie rule applies to riders who have not competed in a specific number of races so there would likely be a point throughout the year where the 'step' from rookie to factory is acceptable abd allowable within the rules. But that would only apply where the factory is in a position to 'take' that rider as Ducati have been, but would Yamaha with tech3 etc.
I suspect that a lot of it would be based upon who has the contract with the rider, whether that contract holder would release the rider and what compensation will that contract holder receive. In shory using Kallio, is his contract with Ducati or Pramac and if Pramac how much compensation is being returned to them?
All hypothetical of course.
But, it does show a possible interesting conundrum.
What say, in race 1 of 2010, one of the factory riders is somehow ruled out for a months or two and the satellite team riders are either not released or ineligible (although I suspect that at least one satellite rider will always be eligible). Basically, what if nobody is available to replace the factory rider - what then?
But, to your original point I would suspect that Spies as the example would be allowed to the factory team as it would be deemed 'extrordinary' or 'extenuating' circumstances (but, my bet is Yamaha would take CEII first in 2010).
Garry