1) bring back the 990s
2) keep the 21L fuel capacity
3) get rid of tracks with long straights (except Mugello--we need one classic test of manhood)
How will this fix things?
First, shorter straights means lower top speeds, so Dorna will be happy.
If you bring back the 990's and keep the 21L, bigger engines will be running at lower revs
I can hear the thunder now. Furthermore, they won't hit really high top speeds down a short straight. Huge power won't be necessary b/c wheely control will back it off. Plus aerodynamics isn't as important so bikes can be styled. No more ducks ..., no more big advantage from being narrow. They can even paint on headlights like NASCAR
Short straights means investing millions in 5 extra hp of top end hit won't be worth it. Teams will have to focus on chassis dynamics. Teams will be rewarded for working with their riders, regardless of how legendary or excellent they may be.
Engine development costs killed the privateer when 4-strokes were introduced, but, you only need about 200-210 hp to achieve 250-300 kph quickly. A variety of manufacturers can achieve that. Plus, manufacturers can run many of different engine configurations and still make the required power. Twins and triples cost less to manufacture than V-4s and V-5s. If engine costs drop more manufacturers and privateers can play, and they can bring their hairbrained systems with them. It will almost be "run what you brung" which makes for fun racing.
If you reduce the straight length, you have to add turns or run more laps to meet minimum distance requirements. More laps and more turns equals no rest for the tires; compounds will have to be harder. If compounds are harder managing chassis flex and wheel spin will be more important than ever. Those skills are more "seat of the pants" than seat of the microchip. Furthermore, shaping corners will be more important than ever, so people can ride a variety of lines. Harder tires also means reduced corner speeds and more emphasis on race management.
If the tires don't rest, the rider doesn't rest. Big or little won't matter. All you have to do is get in the weight room and bulk up enough to keep the bike on it's side for 50 minutes.
Average speeds will be slower with more turns, so races will be longer. That's one more ad slot without a caution flag. Advertisers will be happy and it won't be any better or any worse than it already is.
Well is this a good long term plan for Dorna? or am I missing something?
2) keep the 21L fuel capacity
3) get rid of tracks with long straights (except Mugello--we need one classic test of manhood)
How will this fix things?
First, shorter straights means lower top speeds, so Dorna will be happy.
If you bring back the 990's and keep the 21L, bigger engines will be running at lower revs
Short straights means investing millions in 5 extra hp of top end hit won't be worth it. Teams will have to focus on chassis dynamics. Teams will be rewarded for working with their riders, regardless of how legendary or excellent they may be.
Engine development costs killed the privateer when 4-strokes were introduced, but, you only need about 200-210 hp to achieve 250-300 kph quickly. A variety of manufacturers can achieve that. Plus, manufacturers can run many of different engine configurations and still make the required power. Twins and triples cost less to manufacture than V-4s and V-5s. If engine costs drop more manufacturers and privateers can play, and they can bring their hairbrained systems with them. It will almost be "run what you brung" which makes for fun racing.
If you reduce the straight length, you have to add turns or run more laps to meet minimum distance requirements. More laps and more turns equals no rest for the tires; compounds will have to be harder. If compounds are harder managing chassis flex and wheel spin will be more important than ever. Those skills are more "seat of the pants" than seat of the microchip. Furthermore, shaping corners will be more important than ever, so people can ride a variety of lines. Harder tires also means reduced corner speeds and more emphasis on race management.
If the tires don't rest, the rider doesn't rest. Big or little won't matter. All you have to do is get in the weight room and bulk up enough to keep the bike on it's side for 50 minutes.
Average speeds will be slower with more turns, so races will be longer. That's one more ad slot without a caution flag. Advertisers will be happy and it won't be any better or any worse than it already is.
Well is this a good long term plan for Dorna? or am I missing something?
I can hear the thunder now. Furthermore, they won't hit really high top speeds down a short straight. Huge power won't be necessary b/c wheely control will back it off. Plus aerodynamics isn't as important so bikes can be styled. No more ducks ..., no more big advantage from being narrow. They can even paint on headlights like NASCAR :lol: 
