- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 3,802
- Location
- Tuscany, Italy
Well I guess there's many ways to look at it:
Rossi didn't win 2006 - for a lot of reasons and I'd say mostly his own fault - distractions, and ...........................
Now for 2007 if anyone wants to argue that the CS Ducati was a .... bike, then they're going to have to accept that everything else on the grid was SUPER-.... - aka .... squared.
Now - how about if Rossi had been on the Duc in 2007 with JB doing what he does well - then maybe 2008/ 09 would also have been Duc years and by 2010 Rossi would have left MotoGP. Just the thought - who would catch the crap from about half of our members if he wasn't around
But - really this hypothetical regurgitation of history along the what could have been if........... just sucks
When we go to 1000cc the old rule that the top riders get the best bikes and most support will (rightly) continue in MotoGP just like the pecking order is in every other sport.
And just to round it off - there are 3 real aliens out there in 2011 - Rossi, Lollo and Stoner (choose the order)
Pedro is ImO an alienette and Nicky - well it's been a while since he's been at the front and I think 2006 made him more of a "sure hand Luke" than an alien
LOL
As a (rare) Rossi and Stoner fan, and a longtime Ducatista, I had to defend Stoner throughout 2007 insisting that Stoner was riding in an incredible way and that he was to be credited fully for winning that title. Now, curiously, I have to (try to) make people reason when they say that Ducati has always been a ..... bike in GP, and that it won in 2007 only because of Stoner's miraculous powers.
Extreme views are usually wrong: of course Stoner's contribution was paramount and undeniable, but hey, wake up -- not even JC can win on a bike that does not have some technical edge in some key areas.
Ducati had marked technical advantages in 2007: 1. Engine power 2. Tires 3. Electronics -- and disadvantages that we now know better in 1. Steering 2. Narrow rpm useful range 3. Radically different design from any mainstream Jap bike, making it a difficult to understand beast for riders.
Now we know that Stoner, thanks to his unique (in GP) style of controlling the bike with the throttle and the rear brake, could make the bike turn quickly keeping the engine revving high and so was able to adapt and exploit the other advantages fully. Other riders (Capirossi and Barros in 2007) had trouble. Would Rossi (or the Lorenzo of today) have won in 2007 on the Ducati? I think probably yes. But it's speculation of course. Would the Alienette have won? Probably not. So I agree we have 3 Aliens and one Alienette.
If Stoner was really capable of winning titles on '......' bikes (IMO nobody can at this level) then he would have continued winning the title in 2008, 2009, 2010 etc. for eternity. Still he won many races even when Ducati gradually lost much of his advantage (without improving enough in the other areas where it was lacking) , and that is testimony of the incredible rider he is and to his unique (so far) adaptation to the Ducati Desmosedici.
Rossi is coming to grips with it. He is not as fast as Stoner in adapting, and was coming out of a nightmare 2010, but hes' now almost ok physically so watch out for that #46 Ducati in the coming races, and not because it will become a torpedo as in Jerez...
I feel almost sorry for all those who have spent so many words on the end of Rossi, on his inability to ride the Ducati fast, and blahh blah.... They should have waited issuing all those wishful verdicts.