<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Aug 26 2008, 09:28 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>The problem is you are only willing to draw conclusions that perfectly fit your pre-existing theory. Its not an uncommon way to go about things, but I can't get on board with such a narrow outlook, its just not science
Why do you think it's my job to get you on board? If anything, my job is to make sure you don't get on board, that way if an announcement is ever made or if a reliable leak ever comes out, I get to gloat. Then I can use historical success to rant against anyone in GP I don't like.
No one subscribes to my theory 100%, least of all me,
BUT
thankfully, people realize that after multiple emergency closed-door meetings, it is less likely that the sport is being run the same way. As I've stated before, it is not crazy to assume that the sport had a huge crisis then solved problems within the privacy of the meetings---such an assertion has historical foundation.
It is crazy to assume they held emergency tire meetings to address the defunct state of operations, and afterwards all parties emerged happy by resolving to do nothing.