I guess it depends on the situation. I belive his age gives him an advantage at Ducati that Checa and Gibernau didn't have. Ducati want young talent, and they've been having trouble getting it. They don't seem to be intrested in bringing a rookie straight out of 250s, perhaps because it's a gamble to see how they do on a bigger bike. Take Depuniet for example. Hang on, he was crap in 250s as well. OJ might be a better example. Better on a 250 than a 500. I think that's a risk Ducati don't want to take. So they've been looking at guys like Hopkins, Melandri and Stoner. Young guys with a bit of MotoGP experience under their belt. If Stoner has a bad season in 2007, his age might be his saving grace. He's still got a good 10+ years in him, barring injury. However, if he keeps up the hot head and attitude he used with LCR, Ducati will spit him out like a knarled Kangaroo bone. He needs to realise that he's NOT Valentino Rossi. A rider with Rossi's natural talent and ablilty is a rare thing. That's why Rossi can afford to do things his way. Other riders have to be a bit more rational about it, take advice, learn thier limits, learn the bike's limit, race with thier head, not with their balls. It's the only way to consistently good finishes, which is the only way to world championships. That said, I belive Stoner has matured this year, which is a hard thing to admit as a critic. There is, however, a long way to go.