I voted AMA, because that is what I ‘prefer’. However it must be qualified. I like motorcycle racing, and watch everything I can get here, which isn't much. So, I voted for the AMA because I'm a homer (that means I root for the home team). I don't know .... about the guys running around in 125/250. The only thing I know is a few names, usually the front runners (thanks to TV coverage of them only) and that is it. We get the lower GP classes days and sometimes weeks later, if at all. It’s almost like asking the Euros, ‘hey what do you prefer watching more, GP lower classes or AMA’ (assuming they get some of our races).
AMA Superbikes (& Superstock) haven't been all that exciting for years, it’s really just a Suzuki cup. But Supersport and Formula Extreme have been very competitive and exciting. I watch all the 125/250 races, and they are as interesting as the AMA Supersport & Formula Extreme for me. If it were just a question of 'racing' well the GP lower classes are more exciting. However, I can relate to the machines that are run in the AMA. (I don't know if it’s the same in the UK & Europe, but we hardly ever see a two-stroke road machine, if ever on the road). On top of that, there are zero Americans to root for in 250s and only one token project-KR American in 125.
I'm not happy about the GP lower classes are not running at Laguna. I think all three classes should travel as a whole. It’s a good thing they will be at Indy. I think interest here is hurt by not having Americans in the lower classes (except for Bonsey). Its NOT like there is no talent here, so this begs the question, why is that? I have personally (perhaps with bias) answered this question as follows: GP is not interested in budding American talent, and those who made it to the premier class simply couldn’t be denied by virtue of talent. So my reaction is of course, .... them. So I don’t go out of my why to follow the GP lowers.
So basically, I think it’s a matter of lacking Americans, little to no coverage, strange bikes, and I don't know .... about the backgrounds of the lower class riders. That is all the opposite of the AMA. I can relate to their bikes, we get better (but still not Euro standards) TV coverage and we have seen them race since youngsters.
Today we are on the cusp of a real a dramatic change to American motorcycle racing. Those entrusted in running the AMA have made the decision to either elevate or destroy motorcycle racing in the United States by handing a battered gauntlet to a group of individuals who so far threaten to dismantle (or advance) this sport. By most all accounts, this may be the end of what was once a great showcase and producer of talent. If our fears are realized, then racing everywhere will be hurt. I'm not fond of Dorna either, so perhaps, WSBK may reap the benefits of narrow-minded greedy and political mismanagement of this sport.
Disclaimer: Now I know some of you will be tempted to answer the question by erroneously thinking the inquiry is: ‘what is better’, but that is NOT the question.