This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Alex Barros Interview

Joined Jul 2007
74 Posts | 0+
New Zealand
This from motogpnews.com - Actually looks legit!!!
http://www.motogpnews.com/home.php?pageid=1120



Alex Barros is a true one off. We’re not talking about his voodoo abilities here, or the fact that he looks just as tired in real life as he does on the TV. We’re talking about his career. No other rider in the modern era has raced against Gardner, Lawson, Rainey, Doohan, Rossi and Stoner in their prime. He’s also raced 500 two-strokes when they were the most difficult machines to ride on the planet (and broke more legs than Al Pacino), experienced the big-bang evolution, the four-stroke revolution and is able to compare the fire-breathing 990s with the (allegedly) easy to ride 800s.

Now out of a contract with MotoGP, Barros talks about Cagivas, Goodwood, Ducatis, what were the best bikes and what he’s up to now. I met Alex in the suitably plush surroundings of the Dunhill Driver’s Suite at The 2008 Goodwood Festival of Speed. It was difficult getting to speak to Barros, not because of all those years confronting Journalists has made him defensive, far from it, it was that no one knew what he looked like. But then, this is Goodwood. If you’re not Stirling Moss or Lewis Hamilton, you can go hang. This is hardly what you’d expect from a man, who has beaten Rossi and Schwantz in his career.

Barros, exclusively for MGPN spoke about his career and who’s the best and what he thinks of the current scene.

He then reflected on his career, “I’ve been racing 21 years in the World Championship, 29 in total. There are still some people pushing for me to come back, but I don’t know. I have had the pleasure to ride against many great riders.”

“I’ve raced against three generations of excellent riders the first batch like Lawson, Mackenzie, Spencer, Cardalora then Doohan, Criville, Gibernau, Rossi and Biaggi, now the new generation like Stoner and Pedrosa.”

However, Barros, who you’d expect to be in a prime position to name the greatest rider would not say who is his favourite, “As for the greatest rider. People say that in the 80’s and 90’s the 500s were the best and created the best riders. But I think it’s wrong to say that. You can’t compare Rossi to Agostini. Each year, the World Champion is the best rider of the moment. You just can’t compare them.” (Even Hayden to Rossi?)

“There is not just one rider, but many good riders. I’ve had the privilege to learn from great riders throughout my career as well. I learnt from Ron Haslam, still a great friend, Randy Mamola and Kevin Schwantz. I’ve been blessed in my career to race against so many decent riders.”

What does he think of the modern era, the 800s and the 990s, who have been blamed for making the sport boring? “Now the bikes are much easier to ride. I don’t like them. The 990s were the best bikes I’ve ever ridden in my life. When they first came out, they had no electronics. In 2003 and 2004 the bikes were fantastic, but then they started to get electronic aides. The 2005 bikes were starting to get that way and the 2006 bikes were more reliant on electronics but the 800s are reliant fully on electronics.”

“It’s like F1. You come out of a corner, full throttle and bang – the bike does everything no spinning or wheeling or anything. I know it’s safe, and the rider doesn’t crash as much, but the riders have lost the connection with the bikes. MotoGP should follow F1’s lead by making changes so that it’s the rider’s input that is the most important.”

“They need to take a step back. From my point of view, it’s not right. The 990s were fantastic without electronics. You had to control all of the problems yourself. You need some electronics, but you want the rider to be the main influence, not the other way round. The rider must do the job, not the bike.”

Continuing his comments on the current scene, Barros said, “If you race in a Satellite team like I did with D’Antin in 2007, you can’t do anything to the engine, it comes sealed. If the guy in the factory wants to do something to your bike, using Bluetooth they just change it and you can do nothing about it. This is very disappointing for the racing and the Championship as the politics come to influence the sport more. Before, politics did nothing, now it’s the other way.”

Barros is worried about the current class. Like all us punters, he thinks this year is a bit rubbish. He said, “I see the MotoGP class in a very difficult moment. There’s not many riders, the budgets are tight and take Assen this year, and a few riders crash and there were hardly anyone on the track.”

“They [Dorna] need to do something to reduce costs and make it easier for a Satellite team to win. At the moment, if you’re on a Satellite bike, you can do nothing. Everyone can say what they like, but I know this to be true.”

“If MotoGP wants to move on, they have to make two teams per factory, Kawasaki and Suzuki must have two teams and Ducati must have two proper factory teams so we can have decent races.”

Talking about the ‘nail for everyone else to ride but Stoner’ Ducati, he says, “The Ducati is not an easy bike to ride. It is a very point and squirt bike; it’s difficult. Loris (Capirossi) and I had the same problem last year. Casey Stoner is the only one who doesn’t have any problems. You check in the data-logging how he is going so fast and these settings are only for him – no one else can do what he’s doing. The bike’s not made for him, but it seems that way. When he first tested it at Valencia I was there and he was fast immediately on it.”

“At the moment, I think Ducati have made a mistake with this bike it was very successful last year but, Yamaha and Honda have caught up though. At Qatar last year, Stoner passed Rossi halfway down the straight, now it’s just before the braking point.”

“Only Casey can ride the bike now, they have to change it to develop it to make it more user-friendly for other riders.”

But would he ever go back if he had an offer? “I don’t ever want to go back to MotoGP. Never. I am looking to World Superbike. 2006 was excellent; the way I raced in 2006 on my bike, I can’t do it again. I want to go to a really good team and win the World Championship. It’s still my goal to win a World Championship. I have some really competitive offers, so for 2009 I will hopefully be back.”

“But, for now I am still racing. But racing Supermoto. It’s excellent as I can race with no pressure and just enjoy. I still love racing, it’s been my life. I hope to be back racing professionally next year.”

And that is where the interview ended. Barros has had criticism in the past over his riding, we’ve done it here, but he was quite a dude to meet in real life and really went for it when we spoke to him. Let’s see him have a go at Biaggi in ’09.
 
I always liked Barros ever since I remember him racing closely with Doohan. Doohan was and always will be my favorite rider, but Barros made that season much more exciting than it could have been. He was like the precursor to Creville, and a great rider.

It seems that a lot of riders who rode the 500s or 990's in their first two years really resent and do not like the 800s. Wayne Rainey also talked about how much he cant stand electronic aids in the latest issue of Road Racing World.
 
its a shame we don't have more of the 500 riders still around... at least you knew they were the real deal.
 
It seems the electronics issue builds and builds....I'm not against all electronics, but I am very much against TC!!! For once F1 may be showing us the way to go....WSB is def more interesting racing, purer for sure. More and more info leaks out of inside areas of motogp about how it's not good for the racing. Whilst I respect casey (he's got balls of rock to keep it pinned open when others loose their nerve) and he is the only one to get the most outta the duke, does he really have the semi-devine throttle control and bike control/race craft of great racers like a schwantz, doohan, rossi etc etc. I don't believe he does. Why go from a serial crasher to prob the guy who puts it down least over an off-season and a change of bike? And the Michelin tyres weren't the 'total' reason for his crashing on the LCR Honda. This coming from Barros, a man whose riden all the bikes over last 20 years to compare them...a bad endorsement of the 800s that Ezy and his chump mates should listen to. AB also makes a good point about the costs of it, and the fact that factory teams have a snowball's chance in hell. Another direction F1 may be showing us! Never really respected Barros as a major contender, but have always thought he was a very solid guy...very popular around the paddock as well!
 
Barros isn't "the man" - he was a very good rider, but he did sweet .... all in what - over 200 top class rides? Fair enough, his opinion has weight to it, but I certainly wouldn't say it's gospel.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Son of Doohan @ Aug 12 2008, 07:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Barros isn't "the man" - he was a very good rider, but he did sweet .... all in what - over 200 top class rides? Fair enough, his opinion has weight to it, but I certainly wouldn't say it's gospel.

did your .... just recently get sand in it, or were you just born like that?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (xx CURVE xx @ Aug 12 2008, 10:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>did your .... just recently get sand in it, or were you just born like that?
Unlike your stinky ......, my .... has a brain - maybe if you used yours you wouldn't crash so much you dumb ....!
<
 
4387:Alex_Bar...Photo_17.jpg]

4386:Alex_Bar...Photo_14.jpg










Who remembers 'the men in black' cracking team!
 

Attachments

  • Alex_Barros_Photo_17.jpg
    Alex_Barros_Photo_17.jpg
    43.6 KB
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Son of Doohan @ Aug 12 2008, 06:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Unlike your stinky ......, my .... has a brain - maybe if you used yours you wouldn't crash so much you dumb ....!
<


a .... with no balls is just a weiner
<
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bill @ Aug 12 2008, 07:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Whilst I respect casey (he's got balls of rock to keep it pinned open when others loose their nerve) and he is the only one to get the most outta the duke, does he really have the semi-devine throttle control and bike control/race craft of great racers like a schwantz, doohan, rossi etc etc. I don't believe he does. Why go from a serial crasher to prob the guy who puts it down least over an off-season and a change of bike? And the Michelin tyres weren't the 'total' reason for his crashing on the LCR Honda. ........This coming from Barros........,

Talking about the ‘nail for everyone else to ride but Stoner’ Ducati, he says, “The Ducati is not an easy bike to ride. It is a very point and squirt bike; it’s difficult. Loris (Capirossi) and I had the same problem last year. Casey Stoner is the only one who doesn’t have any problems. You check in the data-logging how he is going so fast and these settings are only for him – no one else can do what he’s doing. The bike’s not made for him, but it seems that way. When he first tested it at Valencia I was there and he was fast immediately on it.”

The bike wasn't fitted with TC at that point in Valencia yet Barros was impressed. I think your condesending remark "Whilst I respect Casey" but should be followed up with "I'm just a VR fan [only]nervours as hell that this kid might just give my man a shake up"
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (vibe @ Aug 12 2008, 03:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>The bike wasn't fitted with TC at that point in Valencia yet Barros was impressed. I think your condesending remark "Whilst I respect Casey" but should be followed up with "I'm just a VR fan [only]nervours as hell that this kid might just give my man a shake up"

Yeah, nothing short of kneeling in front of your GOD CS will do. Right?
While he at least give credit and an argument supported by the interview with Barros, the new Stoner cheerleader around has no arguments but another "Your just a VR fan"! Good start.
 
I'd go along with pretty much everything Barros is saying. The guy has experienced more in Grand Prix motorcycle racing than any rider ever has or ever will. And for those dismissing Michelin as a contributor to Stoner's crashes, get real. Why else did Ducati bail on Michelin after 2004? Because if you aren't on a Repsol Honda or aren't (weren't) Valentino Rossi, you aren't .... to Michelin. And the level of your support from Michelin will be reflective of that philosophy.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Austin @ Aug 12 2008, 03:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I'd go along with pretty much everything Barros is saying. The guy has experienced more in Grand Prix motorcycle racing than any rider ever has or ever will. And for those dismissing Michelin as a contributor to Stoner's crashes, get real. Why else did Ducati bail on Michelin after 2004? Because if you aren't on a Repsol Honda or aren't (weren't) Valentino Rossi, you aren't .... to Michelin. And the level of your support from Michelin will be reflective of that philosophy.

Or maybe it just as simple as Ducati state them selves: We can't compete on their turf, we must do something different, therefor Bridgestone. It's not all about the saturday night tires austin. They were used now and then, some times even discarded for a tested tire. If the Michelin support was such an issue why didn't the same Barros comment on that?
I'm not arguing against tires being an issue with stoner, but as a 250 ridier relying on the front it's easy to wash out in the start with a less than optimal front. Neither the Michelins or the Honda front were optimal. Bridgestone got praise for their front tire long before CS came on board, so to me it's him not adapting to what he had in his rookie year that made him go down so many times, and the facts seems to support it.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (#36 Fan @ Aug 11 2008, 09:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>“Now the bikes are much easier to ride. I don’t like them. The 990s were the best bikes I’ve ever ridden in my life. When they first came out, they had no electronics. In 2003 and 2004 the bikes were fantastic, but then they started to get electronic aides. The 2005 bikes were starting to get that way and the 2006 bikes were more reliant on electronics but the 800s are reliant fully on electronics.”

“It’s like F1. You come out of a corner, full throttle and bang – the bike does everything no spinning or wheeling or anything. I know it’s safe, and the rider doesn’t crash as much, but the riders have lost the connection with the bikes. MotoGP should follow F1’s lead by making changes so that it’s the rider’s input that is the most important.”

“They need to take a step back. From my point of view, it’s not right. The 990s were fantastic without electronics. You had to control all of the problems yourself. You need some electronics, but you want the rider to be the main influence, not the other way round. The rider must do the job, not the bike.”
this say's it in a nutshell for me. if this is a real barros interview, it is motogpnews after all, then it holds plenty of weight. 1 of the few guy's who was able to spank rossi when he 1st got a 990.
 
I'm a fan of motogp before VR and any other rider, my sporting 'heroes' lie in other sports. And it seems a fair few of us are getting fecked of with TC. Why does it matter if it's banned, F1 is a prototype series as well, and this season of F1 has been more exciting than recent previous years. Bernie Ecclestone realised it's not solely about making the fastest car humanly possible, but providing entertainment to the audience. Even if without TC Rossi never won another race, I'd still opt for it to be banned. More and more talk of the electronically educated new generation of riders. Even CS's own countryman Jerry Burgess referred to him as a 'twist and go monkey'. I'd like to see more skill in the wrist, and less about the skill of the TC technicians. Nothing against CS he's certainly not the only one benfitting. Short-term, if we have 7 more races like Laguna and he wins the WC then I'll please happy as Larry. CS giving VR a shake up is the best thing that could have happened to VR, enjoying watching him respond to it. VR's now more focused than I've seen him in 2/3 years. However, I feel if TC were banned/limited then there would be other and more riders able to challenge VR, and CS Pedro etc etc, and we'd have a more exciting sport. WSB consistently has more dog-fights on track atm!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bill @ Aug 12 2008, 06:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Even CS's own countryman Jerry Burgess referred to him as a 'twist and go monkey'.

Yea i feel Stoner and the new generation riders mostly benefit from electronics but when it comes to race craft they are severely lacking in experience and by becoming or thinking they are too good too soon.

Laguna was a good example of that.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Austin @ Aug 12 2008, 01:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I'd go along with pretty much everything Barros is saying. The guy has experienced more in Grand Prix motorcycle racing than any rider ever has or ever will. And for those dismissing Michelin as a contributor to Stoner's crashes, get real. Why else did Ducati bail on Michelin after 2004? Because if you aren't on a Repsol Honda or aren't (weren't) Valentino Rossi, you aren't .... to Michelin. And the level of your support from Michelin will be reflective of that philosophy.
+1. Yeah it sucks the politics of racing. This team is sponsored by these guys who want them to win so we need special consideration etc etc etc. WHat a shame that it really is that way. Barros is and has been a really good solid racer and an overall decent guy. For him to be tellin us that the TC issues and what was and what is current and how things need to change is very relevant to the success of the sport in the future.
 
There is no doubt that Stoner is the man when it comes to trusting the electronics and opening the throttle. However, that is not to say that he would be crap if they took away TC. I think the only difference would be that the racing would be closer and more exciting with the same people at the front most of the time.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bill @ Aug 12 2008, 06:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>However, I feel if TC were banned/limited then there would be other and more riders able to challenge VR, and CS Pedro etc etc, and we'd have a more exciting sport. WSB consistently has more dog-fights on track atm!

Great post. As a side note, WSBK has traction control as well. How it compares to Moto GP's version of traction control I do not know.