I found the article interesting but overall a ...... thing for him to publish.
Yes, we all want to know the inside scoop on these things but the article shows it's nothing special after all, just someone who can't cope on all fronts as you must to be champion.
It's a ....... kid, don't publish a story that yanks his pants down and tells everyone he's no good and never will be.
And then you send it to him and ask for a comment. A ....... kid, what do you think he's going to say when he reads an article that's about to be published making him look like a loser.
And Krop gets to publish what he wants, if he wants. The kid doesn't. Yes, you'll publish his childish retort but what if he said, "I don't give a .... what you think, Krop. You're a mediocre writer spurred on to delusions of grandeur by your ever-fellating readers."? Would he publish that? Maybe. If he wanted to. But he's sure going to publish his hit piece, as he wants it.
So, it just seems .......
And I also think it's easy for him to publish such a negative article about a nobody rider. Where's a similar article about an important rider? Oh, no, that might lose him any access.
Where's the integrity now?
My two cents.