This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

WSBK 2011 Rule Changes End To Aprilia's Gear Cams

Joined Feb 2007
6K Posts | 58+
Rovrum S,Yorks Eng
WSBK 2011 Rule Changes Include An End To Aprilia's Gear-Driven Cams



Submitted by David emmett on Sat, 2010-07-31 21:33. As is common at world championship motorcycle racing events, the Superbike commission - the World Superbike series' rule-making body - gathered to discuss rules to be introduced for the 2011 series. After the meeting, a press release was issued detailing the changes to be made for next season, and they make interesting reading.



The biggest change was the scrapping of the loophole which has allowed Aprilia to drive the camshafts on their RSV4 World Superbike machines using gears instead of the chains fitted on the production bikes. The rule had originally read "The method of cam drive (chain, belt or gears) must remain as on the homologated motorcycle unless a complete kit is available through normal commercial channels" but the last part of the sentence - "unless a complete kit is available through normal commercial channels" - has been dropped.



Aprilia's use of gear-driven cams has been controversial from the start. The original cylinders are supplied with the machining required to fit the gear drive as standard, but use a chain drive to keep production costs down. The Aprilia's V4 configuration makes this even more costly, requiring two sets of gears for each bank of cylinders, and so fitting gear-driven cams to the road bike would add considerably to the basic price. Fitted as an aftermarket race kit, the gear-driven cams allow the RSV to attain higher revs and allow for more precise cam timing. The RSV4 has been fast from the start of the season, but since the Alitalia Aprilia started using the gear drive, the disparity with the other bikes has grown.



To put an end to the arguments, the Superbike Commission has prohibited fitting aftermarket kits, and all World Superbike machines must use the cam drive fitted as standard. Of course, this does not prevent Aprilia from using gear-driven camshafts completely, but it does require that the RSV4 be sold with the gear drive as standard, something which Aprilia may be less keen to do.



Two other notable changes are to be made for 2011. The first is the banning of a 2nd bike for the World Supersport class, bringing it into line with the 125cc and Moto2 support classes in MotoGP. The rule is aimed at cutting costs, as having a single bike complete with spares to repair it prepared to race is still cheaper than having two complete bikes. The rule hopes to remove the advantage that the wealthier teams such as Ten Kate Honda and Parkalgar Honda have over the mid-pack riders.



The final change of note is the rescheduling of practice on Friday. Activities had been cut back on Friday morning as a cost-cutting measure, but instead of losing practice, the remaining practice sessions were just squeezed together on Friday afternoon. With the restoration of on-track action on Friday morning, a more relaxed schedule can be followed, and the World Supersport class can get some practice on track at around the time they will be racing on Sunday, a complaint that was commonly heard from the WSS teams. The measure never really cut costs, as teams had to arrive at the track by Thursday at the latest anyway, and would sit twiddling their thumbs on Friday morning, waiting to hit the track at noon. A similar measure is to be tried in the MotoGP series at Aragon, when the schedule will revert to four sessions of practice, including one on Friday morning



motomatters
 
I just posted in WSBK thread, but I like it better as it's own discussion.



I'm not in favor of the 1 bike & 1 spare engine rule in WSS. I don't like it in Moto2 either b/c the small teams get stuck rebuilding bikes until the wee hours of the morning b/c the teams aren't allowed to bring spares. I can understand it a bit for Moto2 b/c they can't easily cut costs for limited-production prototype motorcycles, but it doesn't make sense in WSS. There are better ways to cut costs without drastically reducing team resources, imo. The carbon fiber ban is a good start. Spec ECU would be another nice cost cutting measure.



WSS is in a sad state. Look how big the field is at Silverstone this weekend b/c the BSB guys are out to impress. It should be this way at every round, but most national teams cannot afford to prepare multiple engines for each event. Engines are the expense in WSS. As far as I'm concerned, they haven't written any rules or made any changes to improve engine reliability.



Banning gear driven cams is a good idea. The kit costs 25 grand so it's better that they leave it out of the sport.
 
When this controversy started, the other teams knew this was side stepping the rules. Aprilia said it was no big deal, that the gear driven cam was not a performance boost, but was for reliability. The other teams knew better. It allowed more revs and a reported 4-5 hp throughout the rev range.
 
wonder who bitched about Aprilia and the cams?? Maybe Ducati is upset with their results this year and is lashing out at others doing well??

Ducati looks like they may have complained with this statement.





"Nicky is a wonderful person and a great rider. This year, he greatly contributed to improving our Desmosedici racer. Next year, he and Valentino will hone the bike to its ultimate winning potential. We knew that we were going to face a tough year in World Superbike. The new rules don't help; someone was allowed to bend them, and our 1198 has reached its ultimate potential. In two years, we shall be ready with our new 1200cc Twin.""







I was thinking....if Ducati is taking about Aprilia's geared cams in this statement, how could Aprilia bend the rules when the FIM made it specifically legal for Aprilia to run those parts at and beyond the Miller USA round???
 
wonder who bitched about Aprilia and the cams?? Maybe Ducati is upset with their results this year and is lashing out at others doing well??

Ducati looks like they may have complained with this statement.





"Nicky is a wonderful person and a great rider. This year, he greatly contributed to improving our Desmosedici racer. Next year, he and Valentino will hone the bike to its ultimate winning potential. We knew that we were going to face a tough year in World Superbike. The new rules don't help; someone was allowed to bend them, and our 1198 has reached its ultimate potential. In two years, we shall be ready with our new 1200cc Twin.""







I was thinking....if Ducati is taking about Aprilia's geared cams in this statement, how could Aprilia bend the rules when the FIM made it specifically legal for Aprilia to run those parts at and beyond the Miller USA round???

If you have not followed WSBK for a long time, let me fill you in. If Ducati isnt winning, they are complaining . If they are not winning, they dont want to play. They are not happy unless they have an advantage. Working gray areas is what makes a team a winner. Its all about finding loopholes and exploiting them to the edge of breaking the rules, but not actually doing it.. Notice he was careful not to say, someone broke the rules. I promise you, their are some instances where Ducati "bends" the rules when they can find a way. Everybody does it.
 
If you have not followed WSBK for a long time, let me fill you in. If Ducati isnt winning, they are complaining . If they are not winning, they dont want to play. They are not happy unless they have an advantage. Working gray areas is what makes a team a winner. Its all about finding loopholes and exploiting them to the edge of breaking the rules, but not actually doing it.. Notice he was careful not to say, someone broke the rules. I promise you, their are some instances where Ducati "bends" the rules when they can find a way. Everybody does it.



Yes Ducati have been beaten at their own game by the other italians this year. Could get interesting now that WSBK has a few euro factories playing Ducati's weight must be a bit lower than it used to be
 
If you have not followed WSBK for a long time, let me fill you in. If Ducati isnt winning, they are complaining . If they are not winning, they dont want to play. They are not happy unless they have an advantage. Working gray areas is what makes a team a winner. Its all about finding loopholes and exploiting them to the edge of breaking the rules, but not actually doing it.. Notice he was careful not to say, someone broke the rules. I promise you, their are some instances where Ducati "bends" the rules when they can find a way. Everybody does it.



I totally agree with you and know that Ducati has enjoyed many advantages over the years in WSBK. If they are not winning then it becomes pouty racing on their part.



I just want to know how Ducati is claiming Aprilia bent the rules if the geared cams were actually/specifically ruled legal to use by the FIM for WSBK. Unless they are talking about a different team or advantage.....this makes them look even worse. They loose Bayliss and thenTardozzi.....get knocked down to a top 10 bike and cry fowl. The 13 rider titles and 16 manufacturer titles in 22 years leaves me feeling no sympathy for poor ol' Ducati......either get more out of your current bike or come out with something different 2 or 4 cylinder....everyone else did.
 

Recent Discussions