<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Marbles @ Oct 18 2005, 10:45 PM)<div class='quotemain'>Hey general don't forget Max Loris Kenny wern't there and Alex went down so you can add a few places to 11th if you wanna compare it to Shakey, he did no better
Good post there Frosty
<div align="right<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't care who crashes out or breaks down. it happens every race, it is an accepted part of every race. I'm glad you chimed in with this reply though, seeing as i was kind of baiting this exact responce. lets break it down and completely to see mathematically and factually who was better. take this as you will, the numbers do not lie or hold biased opinions. I know the brits are brutally protective over their boy shakey.
First off, Biaggi WAS in it, he crashed on the first lap. I can't help if people crash. If 19 of 20 starters crash out during a race does the winner not get a win?
ok so, if we take PI:
There were 18 starters. 2 crashed out (Barros, Biaggi). Verm qualified 14th and finished 11th, only after taking tenth for a bit ahead of hopper, a seasoned veteran in my eyes.
At Malaysia, Shakey qualified 18th of 20, which is worse than 14th of 18 to begin with, statistically. Not only did verm qualify bettr in the field, he finished better. 11th out of the 18 that started. brilliant first race, imo.
How did shakey do?
I'll tell you. He finished 14th out of the 20 that started and 4 of those DNF'd. (ellison, nakano, jaques, and gibernau) so really that made it a race of 16 people and he finished 14th. do the math.
same goes for Qatar. Shakey finished 13th of 17 finishers, 2 of which weren't on the lead lap (hopper and bataini) 19 started that race. mathmatically, verm performed better still.
Good post there Frosty
<div align="right<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't care who crashes out or breaks down. it happens every race, it is an accepted part of every race. I'm glad you chimed in with this reply though, seeing as i was kind of baiting this exact responce. lets break it down and completely to see mathematically and factually who was better. take this as you will, the numbers do not lie or hold biased opinions. I know the brits are brutally protective over their boy shakey.
First off, Biaggi WAS in it, he crashed on the first lap. I can't help if people crash. If 19 of 20 starters crash out during a race does the winner not get a win?
ok so, if we take PI:
There were 18 starters. 2 crashed out (Barros, Biaggi). Verm qualified 14th and finished 11th, only after taking tenth for a bit ahead of hopper, a seasoned veteran in my eyes.
At Malaysia, Shakey qualified 18th of 20, which is worse than 14th of 18 to begin with, statistically. Not only did verm qualify bettr in the field, he finished better. 11th out of the 18 that started. brilliant first race, imo.
How did shakey do?
I'll tell you. He finished 14th out of the 20 that started and 4 of those DNF'd. (ellison, nakano, jaques, and gibernau) so really that made it a race of 16 people and he finished 14th. do the math.
same goes for Qatar. Shakey finished 13th of 17 finishers, 2 of which weren't on the lead lap (hopper and bataini) 19 started that race. mathmatically, verm performed better still.