The Future of World Superbike?

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Mar 11, 2007
Messages
7,980
Location
Texas
I guess it's time for a biannual post about the future of World Superbikes before the 2025 season is underway.

We've had 7 years to digest the slow introduction of race kits, balance of performance, concessions and super concessions, and I think it's fair to say that Superbike is barely holding on. While the on-track action is often entertaining, thanks to talented riders with a flair for the dramatic (Toprak), the superbike industry as a whole is still in contraction. The national series are struggling to pay the bills and homogenize their rulebooks with other series. The World Superbike series is struggling to expand its calendar, and keep the teams and employees well fed.

To address these issues, I think Liberty would be smart to focus on two key concepts:
1. Accessibility
2. Competitiveness

Over the years Superbike has become less accessible for a variety of reasons. The 1000cc mostly-prototype era chased the privateer teams away, who were once the bedrock of Superbike. The race bikes have become increasingly electronic and expensive. It's no longer possible to leverage the skillset of a few good mechanics and a crew chief. Teams need data analysts and electronic engineers to setup the bikes. If aero continues to progress, the sophistication and cost will only increase. The performance of the race bikes has also become prohibitive. Fewer riders have the experience and the technical team support to handle Superbike horsepower. Venues cannot safely support the class, which means fans and local privateers have less access. The lack of access and participation have slowly eroded the competitive landscape, particularly in the national series. World Superbike has grown reliant on ex-GP riders to maintain series notoriety and keep the competition interesting.

For these reasons Superbike should shake things up, and try to recapture the spirit of the 90s:
1. Maintain BoP and introduce Next-Gen rules with less HP to increase manufacturer participation and road-relevance
2. Ditch race kits and homologate the competition models (install the kits at the factory)
3. Simplify the electronic user interface so it's basically pre-selectors or function sliders. Factories will work with the teams to harvest data and improve function.
4. Reduce the cost of the race bikes
5. Return to classic venues like Monza, Laguna Seca, Brands Hatch, and most importantly, return to a track in Japan
6. Ensure accessibility for privateers in the national series

These things are required, imo, to stop a potential merger between MotoGP and World SBK. If the series merge, I suspect the Superbike class will simply disappear. SSP will be re-tuned and replace Moto2.
 
Going backwards in technology has never worked for any race series besides NASCAR. The manufactures certainly dont want their customer bases focused on 20 year old technology, because they wouldnt sell any new bikes.
 
Going backwards in technology has never worked for any race series besides NASCAR. The manufactures certainly dont want their customer bases focused on 20 year old technology, because they wouldnt sell any new bikes.

If you look at the trajectory of motorsport since the advent of electronic control mechanisms, the industry has been in freefall. A few series have grown stronger by conquering the remnants of other series and attracting new motorsports fans, but the cultural impact and number of series has declined sharply. This should surprise to no one because arms races lead to collapse. That's the point. Better to rule the ash heap than share the limelight. Collapsing motorsport is a defensive strategy implemented by globocorp boardrooms, but they can rule motorsport in other ways, and.......maybe try to earn a few bucks.

Regardless, I hope World Superbike electronics rules will not adversely affect the road-going models. I just think competition electronics should be built for the accessibility of the end user, rather than being built for the factory. The customer teams should not be begging for factory support and competing with big tech for data engineers.
 
Its a dead series, and has not really been relevant since the mid 2000s. No races in Japan where half of the manufactures are based, and no races in the USA the biggest motorcycle market.
 
Its a dead series, and has not really been relevant since the mid 2000s. No races in Japan where half of the manufactures are based, and no races in the USA the biggest motorcycle market.

Agreed. The manufacturers wanted out. The Flaminis tried for force them back with MotoGP-lite rules. Not long after the GFC, the manufacturers ran out of money and the boardroom lost interest.

The series is irrelevant, but the Superbike concept is still relevant. Competitors are demanding lower costs and increased safety. The question is whether the manufacturers want to serve this market or whether they want to walk away. The other question is whether SBK needs to be its own series.

The easiest solution is to merge the series, and replace Moto2 and Moto3 with Next Gen SSP and the new Supertwins. That aligns the national series with the international series. It eliminates most of the safety concerns at the national level. It consolidates global talent into a single competitive structure. It would also sunset Superbikes, which will probably never make it through Euro emissions anyway. The cost of TV production, website management, transport logistics, etc would be consolidated and drastically reduced. The manufacturers can sell fewer bikes to more racing teams.

It would be a boon for everyone who survived the merger, but it could not be easily undone.
 
I dont see it as even worth merging. Moto2 is a solid series and so is Moto3, and MotoE will probably be support series along with King of the Baggers. There just is not any room for production based vehicle racing in international pro racing anymore.
 
As long as the costs are low enough, there will be enough factories wanting to race.
Same with the attendants at the races.

There will always be room for showroom ready racing bikes along with prototype.

Going to Japan, US and SouthEast Asia should be a logical step.
 
I dont see it as even worth merging. Moto2 is a solid series and so is Moto3, and MotoE will probably be support series along with King of the Baggers. There just is not any room for production based vehicle racing in international pro racing anymore.

True insofar as producing 1,000 Superbikes per manufacturer and homologating/selling them for road use in dozens of countries at $50,000 a pop, then requiring the race teams to spend another $100,000 per bike to install and tune the race kit. Yes, that's a huge waste of time, especially since most of these bikes will be illegal or severely detuned in another 3-5 years.

The current Superbike formula is a very narrow interpretation of "production" racing. There are many other concepts, and considering the constant grousing about subscription levels and costs in Moto2/3, production racing actually has a lot to offer.
 
Don't watch any WSBK. Got to pay for it also. I already pay a motoGP subs and aint paying another. Have next to no understanding of how it is going apart from Toprak is cleaning up.
 
Don't watch any WSBK. Got to pay for it also. I already pay a motoGP subs and aint paying another. Have next to no understanding of how it is going apart from Toprak is cleaning up.

The story arc is that WSBK made fundamental changes about 7-8 years ago to adopt balance of performance and homologated parts to reduce costs and emphasize production concept.

The series is not appreciably cheaper. It’s only slightly more competitive. Similar to MotoGP the bikes are outrunning the tracks (eg Toprak at Magny Cours last year). The series is barely treading water.

Did they move in the wrong direction? Did they fail to move far enough in the right direction? Is Superbike still worth the effort?
 
Why bother with converting a street legal machine into a race bike? its way easier to build the best racing bike you can and not have to worry about making it street-able.

That would be considered super production nowadays, but it’s similar to the original formula. Only 500 units were required and road homologation rules were lax so teams like Honda and Yamaha were selling bikes that weren’t really available to the public.

Could be an interesting direction. Start with a race bike and move backwards to road homolgation….if you’re interested in selling road bikes.

What’s that formula called that isn’t as tuned? Superstock? What about using that as the premier formula?

Tuning rules go hand in glove with homologation. If they homologate the full race bike, and run Superstock rules, nothing changes despite adopting “Superstock”. Generally, Superstock rules turn stock street bikes into race bikes, rather than making race bikes more stock. Homologation can shield the road bikes to a degree.
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top