This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Suzuki: MotoGP needs major changes

Joined Feb 2007
6K Posts | 58+
Rovrum S,Yorks Eng
Suzuki: MotoGP needs major changes

By Matt Beer Wednesday, January 28th 2009, 16:54 GMT

Loris Capirossi, Suzuki, Motegi MotoGP 2008Suzuki team boss Paul Denning says the MotoGP manufacturers are now agreed that the championship needs major changes in order to survive the economic downturn.

Although no firm details have yet been released, minor cost-cutting adjustments - such as reducing the amount of practice and test mileage - have been agreed for 2009.

But the sport's governing body, the FIM, has called for a dramatic re-think of MotoGP's technical regulations in order to reduce costs and entice new entrants, and Denning agrees that this is necessary.

"There is a generic agreement that cutting costs is a fundamental requirement," he told the official MotoGP website.

"It is not a wish, it is a fundamental requirement to safeguard the future of the championship.

"Some of the short term measures that have already been suggested are not going to be very effective, but they may be a minor help.

"The key point is that with the manufacturers, Dorna, IRTA, looking at things from a promoter´s perspective, an organisational perspective, a private team perspective and so on, all factors have to be considered in terms of priority and that big changes are needed, rather than small tweaks.

"I think there need to be some fairly fundamental, sweeping changes, to take a decent percentage out of the costs, in order to make the decision making process easier for manufacturers and teams, for participation and making it more attractive to provide further bikes and expand the championship in the future. That has to be the ultimate target."

MotoGP is currently down to 17 entrants and four manufacturers after the withdrawal of Kawasaki, although the Japanese manufacturer's ex-works bikes could yet reappear with a private team.

LINK
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>But the sport's governing body, the FIM, has called for a dramatic re-think of MotoGP's technical regulations in order to reduce costs and entice new entrants,

it's not as if there "real" prototypes ! Anyone remember wcm ?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Jan 28 2009, 10:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>it's not as if there "real" prototypes ! Anyone remember wcm ?
Do you mean when Peter Clifford tried to use slightly modified R1 motors?..the main grey area focussed on the speification of the crank if I remember rightly
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrabbiata1 @ Jan 29 2009, 12:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Do you mean when Peter Clifford tried to use slightly modified R1 motors?..the main grey area focussed on the speification of the crank if I remember rightly

I thought it was the silhouette of the engine cases was too similar/the same as the R1 even though the engine didnt share a single component?
 
In any case, allowing unlimited custom parts within the rules rather than requiring them should be more than sufficient. It's not like being able to borrow a bit from production parts if desired is likely to truly dilute the series. Technical limitations need to be more on where you can go than how you get there. Banning specific technologies (carbon brakes, etc.) or imposing control parts can maybe be OK, but banning based on derivation is rather stupid in my opinion.
 
Bring back the 990..limit electros.. freeze engine development...GP would rule once again...

till then i'm buying WSBK T-shirts
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrabbiata1 @ Jan 29 2009, 12:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Do you mean when Peter Clifford tried to use slightly modified R1 motors?..the main grey area focussed on the speification of the crank if I remember rightly
As Thom said ,it was the crank cases that were modded R1 cases, it stupid rules like these that have made the sport to expensive for privateer and now factory teams .
 

Recent Discussions