& In typical Ducati fashion look where pushing so hard has got Hayden....and damn near Rossi in the same exact spot...hmmmm (who by the way can't be bothered to push for 6th or 7th.)
Hey look at that, all the riders with something to prove.fixed.
and in typical racer fashion, Spies, and Stoner....in the exact same damn spot!
Great posts from L8, 22, & Zoot (first one I think I agree with completely).
Said the number 1 Haydonette/stalker.Great posts from L8, 22, & Zoot (first one I think I agree with completely).
Not so good posts from Wilski & Goats. (lollyboppers).
I think they know what they have to do to change, it is just getting their ASAP that is the problem. Be nice if it was with Nicky.Don't be getting comfortable now, I'm sure I will piss you off shortly.
I would like to see Hayden at another team - but I suspect his work ethic wouldn't allow him to give up on the project and the chance of another factory ride is slim.
Given what I just read in Furusawa's interview, it may be that the tide will turn for Ducati in the near future. I believe they have a solid basis for a race bike, but there is something not right in the way it is put together. Furusawa's doctrine regarding suspension harmonics - that has served Yamaha so well in the handling department - should be greedily taken aboard by Preziosi and worked - it seems that they have approached each technical problem as a discrete item and maybe Furusawa's approach is more homogenous.
For an engineer your maths seem to be a little loopy zoot....At the speeds these guys are averaging, every second is 5-6cm.
Even if he was his maths are off...But surely he was talking speed differential was he not?
Being a second behind at race pace means you are 44+ METERS behind not 2/10 of an inch. Half a second behind at race pace means 22+ METERS behind. Quarter second behind means 11+ meters behind... A tenth behind means 4+ meters... How does any of this relate to 5 -6 cm? Resident engineers - Barry, Zoot?Lorenzo/Stoner/Pedrosa and Hayden are well under a second a lap in the race. That, for somewhere like Laguna, works out to around 5cm/lap. That means over 11 corners and straights, he is giving away less than a half a centimetre for each one. Less than 2/10 of an inch.
3610meters = 81seconds or FOURTY FOUR POINT SIX meters per second not 5 - 6 cm. .... dude at your number over 81 seconds a motogp bike would travel 81 x 6 = 486 CENTIMETERS - less than half a meter!!
....!! And that's why I should never rant about maths!!! LOL! Five meters is still in snail range for 81 seconds though!Mick D, I agree with the premise of your post except for this little bit. Seems you made the same mistake as Zoot. 486 cm is 4.86m.
Ok i'll bite...how come people conveniently use numbers to LEAP to the defence of Mr Valentino Rossi ( the number 9 for example) yet conveniently forget these numbers when it suits them (numbers like 2-0-0-6, 2-5-2 and 2-4-7) to defend a rider riding far below his potential as some sort of way of justifying his performance. I don't particularly like my job and if I went in and said 'i'm only going to do half a days work today because I don't like the place and can't be bothered' i'd be sacked.
Even if he was his maths are off...
Being a second behind at race pace means you are 44+ METERS behind not 2/10 of an inch. Half a second behind at race pace means 22+ METERS behind. Quarter second behind means 11+ meters behind... A tenth behind means 4+ meters... How does any of this relate to 5 -6 cm? Resident engineers - Barry, Zoot?
If indeed the Zoot was talking differential he is still wrong. Nicky finished 27 seconds behind Casey. It took him 44 minutes 12.763 seconds (or 2652.763 seconds) to complete 115,520 meters. That is 43.55 m/s or 1175.77 meters behind Casey. Or 36.74 meters per lap. Or 3.34 meters "per corner and straight"... not quite the differential of centimetres Zoot is talkin' about.
For an engineer your maths seem to be a little loopy zoot....
Laguna is 3610 meters long. A very good lap is about 1 minute and 21 seconds (or 81 seconds), therefore:
3610meters = 81seconds or FOURTY FOUR POINT SIX meters per second not 5 - 6 cm. .... dude at your number over 81 seconds a motogp bike would travel 81 x 6 = 486 CENTIMETERS - less than half a meter!!
For as dude posting on multiple threads about all his engineering education, diplomas, certificates, team, track and riding experience you think you'd realise a mgp bike is a wee bit faster than your average snail WITHOUT having to do the math!
...., a turned on engineer such as yourself could have used the 2012 Laguna winners' 160kmph average single lap speed to calculate: 160kmph for 3610 meters equals 44.4 meters per second...
5 - 6 cm per second... Zoot that was just too freakin' funny after your "i'm an engineer" protestations!!!
No protestations. Merely a response to a call that I wasn't. And I have made a single, solitary reference to my qualifications, ever.
[/background][/font]It's the internets... If I wanted a serious life-altering debate I would go get another degree.
Twaaat!
Glad to see you are keeping up your high standard of informative posts.