<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gsfan @ Jun 9 2009, 08:07 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Call me anti-American all you want but American "businessmen" have zilch to crow about. If you take your blinders off you will see that they are at the root of the problems we have right now. Don't go waxing eloquent about the free market ...blah blah blah system. It is a figment of a fools imagination. Anyone, anyone can cut costs. That position is the last bastion of desperate unimaginative fools. I know first hand about business idiots cutting costs with only a bottom line "vision" in mind. Oh god how I know. That is no vision for MotoGP. And seriously, drop the MotoGP going to .... line. It is so last year.
American executives are not the root of the problem, they are the whipping boys for the mob culture in the developed world.
Everything that we have has been gifted to us by the ignorance and blatant economic stupidity of other nations around the world. While we were utilizing relative production advantage and market economies to INCREASE cooperative efforts amongst peoples of the enlightenment, other major nations around the world were busy killing their citizens with authoritarian governments and anti-business legislation.
China is now a free-market fascist nation and India is slowly becoming the world's largest "free-market" democracy. Labor competition from these two nations is slowly depressing the wage rates in the developed world. Without a massive reduction in the consumer price index, our nations would collapse.
The ranks of our upper middle class are slowly going to disappear. Governmental taxation is ENSURING that high income earners with little net worth will vanish in the coming decades. The middle class of the future will be hundreds of millions of Indian and Chinese yuppies who make between $20,000 and $30,000 per year.
These new yuppies can't afford $10,000 sport bikes, even though their incomes will give them a standard of living roughly equal to six-figure wage earners in the West. They can't afford ridiculous $50,000 electric race bikes or hybrid-electric bikes either.
Sports bikes in the future need to achieve high performance for low investment. The displacement rules we currently use to police the sport are leading to exponential growth in R&D costs, and by the manufacturers own admissions, the new technologies don't have any application in the new global consumer market place.
No one does more business in the developing world than the United States. We have a company that imports more Chinese goods than most other nations on earth.
The future of racing needs to be realigned with the changes happening in India and China.
Unlike most people who believe that DORNA need to guide the sport in a specific direction, I believe they need to give the manufacturers options. None of us know exactly what will happen in the future, I suppose there is a possibility that China and India could do us a huge favor and write new onerous anti-business legislation. In a world of ambiguity, survival depends upon diversity of ideas and technologies.
MotoGP is a technologically-homogenized disaster as is F1. Americans don't have a racing industry to brag about (far from it as a matter of fact), but American racing executives do have a very unique insight into the world of cost containment.
Imo, European executives have fallen into the NASCAR trap---they believe that cost containment means controlling technological development. It doesn't. Anyone who believes that reducing costs means reducing technological development is part of the problem----that includes many ill-informed Americans.
Consider this:
If MotoGP used the control tire to control cornering speeds, and if they imposed a top speed limit that could vary based upon the amount of run off available, they could certainly abolish displacement rules and fuel regulation and run a greater number of venues.
Without fuel and displacement rules a wide variety of machines would be eligible to compete. Teams could run ethanol-powered, 600cc turbocharged 4 strokes. They could run clean 2 stroke hybrids. They could run algal-oil rotaries with shaft drive. The could run electric bikes. They could run a nuclear bike if they were so inclined.
Can anyone say such a series would not develop meaningful technology? Manufacturer interest in developing small engine technology and alternative fuels would be enormous. The advertising for little known technologies would be huge beneficial.
I know you love GP the way it is now, but it's not an entertaining business that provides societal benefit, GP is becoming an increasingly petty country club.