Niche sport.
I dont fight it or try to understand how and why it will be more popular.
All I know is the memories and experiences I have had with motorcycles makes me a fan of the sport.
I can only speculate as to why others watch, but I suspect its for similar reasons.
With current contractual obligations riders are either unwilling or unallowed to participate in other variations of motorsport.
The days of old riders would wildcard in many different series, thus broadening their fan base.
Those that lament that the Daytona 200 is a race that once held itself in great esteem and has now become irrelevant need to realize that the 200 didnt suddenly fade away for no reason. Its relevance diminished because named riders decided not to show up.
We cant even get Wsbk guys or Ama guys to race against each other when they are at the same event
When is the last time a GP guy ran the Suzuka 8hr.
There is no greater example of this absurdity then 2 weeks ago when Nicky Hayden couldnt even come to Daytona to watch his brothers because he was in NYC pimping designer jeans.
Americas greatest and most beloved rider cant come to "the world center of racing because he needed to hock some companies wares.
How is this sport ever going to market itself to new audiences when it only allows the world to see them 16 times a year.
How should MotoGP expand? Fix the product.
Doesn't matter how good (or bad) Dorna is at sales and marketing, MotoGP cannot achieve market penetration with a terrible product. They should be obsessing about the technical regulations, cost structure, and diminishing marginal returns. Without a massive B2B commercial enterprise, like F1, they cannot sell the sport to foreign governments.
If they really care about growing the entire motorcycle market, they should stick with 81mm 4-cylinder 1000cc rules and raise fuel capacity to 24L. Homologate a single set of gear ratios to cut costs further. The formula would be much more entertaining than the current 21L formula, and it would bring many new manufacturers into the fray. Costs are stable. Engines don't have to be redesigned. The sport would be a celebration of motorcycling, in general. Then they can get busy sorting SBK.
If they need something more technologically intricate, they should look at other regulatory options. One way or another, it's all about the technical regulations. The changes to the technical regulations must encourage widespread participation, specifically participation from the seven manufacturers in WSBK (7 in 2011). Then Dorna can sell MotoGP to developing countries.
Without manufacturers, sponsors are hard to come by. Without manufacturers and sponsors, MotoGP has no B2B marketplace. Without a B2B marketplace, MotoGP has nothing to sell to foreign governments. How can they get manufacturers and sponsors? By fixing the technical regulations.
The rules suck b/c of the halo effect. MSMA engineers are uber-competent engineers. They don't know ...., imo, about government or economic theory. We end up with a decaying sport with perverse investment incentives. The FIM was in charge of the rulebook for a reason, and some body politic similar to the FIM should be in charge of the rules.
What more is there?
Answer: Curve forgot women.
Yeah but if they don't taste like ham .......... he's not interested!
Because .........
Good responses. I agree with a lot of what u guys are saying.
JohnK, great post, i think the niche aspect is something difficult to overcome. Living in SoCal, its frustrating to know so many people who ride but have zero interest in motoracing. Like Pov mentioned, i've taken heaps of people to the AMA round that we use to have locally at AutoClub speedway (California Speedway), and in the end, it would end up just 3-4 of my same buddies returning. ...., even worse, when i used to work for the trackday organization, i was always amazed at how many trackday regulars didnt know squat about racing. Now the AMA round has been cancelled. Im taking about SoCal bro, where we have perfect riding weather 24/7/365. Where bike nights happen in every other city on various nights of the week. Its frustrating how these dumb .......s all ride sport bikes but none of them know racing exists. Why do u think i spend so much time texting my buddies who i have met here on PS? Cuz u guys get it. Now how can i get others as enthusiastic or mildly enthusiastic about racing?
1. Broaden the market for the product. Im ok with Spain & Italy getting multiple rounds. Their people are uber enthusiastic about the sport, they pay the fees, and show up. Their enthusiasm doesnt hurt but helps. But also try and open it back up in Brazil, Turkey, SE Asia, India, S. Africa, maybe even Canada. Sanction fees should have a slide scale in these new areas, that is, start low in first year to hook, then agree to deals for multiple year contracts.
2. Well, for sure, let the masses see free content. Stop this rediculious ban on youtube. The diehards will buy the motogp.com pass because its comprehensive. Having races on SpeedTV and access to torrents hasnt stopped me from buying the pass. I suspect only diehards buy the pass anyway.
3. Better the racing aspect of the show while maintaining the authenticity of competition. I'd have a team study why the last year of the 990s worked so well, and would try to replicate this with the new formula. If that means having a tire war, lifing fuel limits, banning some forms of electronic aids, revenue sharing, etc. then implement.
4. For gods sake, shorten the gaps between races. 3-4 weeks off is simply too long. SX has races once a week, so given all the extra .... GP has two move, two weeks should be plenty of time. Even the dumb ..... in AMA learned that if you plan the schedule by region, travel costs wont drain the system. (Though at least this year GP figured out how to stay in the US for both rounds without flying to E. Europe in-between, as they did before).
5. Figure out how to produce some human interest content. In the States we have a bunch of shows dedicated to getting to know the players, drivers, athletes, etc. of various sports. Recently i saw a show called 'Inside the Outdoors' which documents in docudrama/reality show format some of the riders in MX. Its fantastic. I get to see the human side of the riders and their teams, sponsors, drama, and ..... Can we put together something like that for GP? Seriously, after watching this, it made me appreciate all the personnel and effort that goes into competing. It endeared me more to the riders who are shown as regular guys putting it all on the line. I think if we had something like this, we honestly wouldnt bicker about rider x for being a clown or an ....... or whatever. Plus it might get people more interested in seeing what happens to them as they go about competing the season. How much do we know about the riders not competing for the title? Are any of us moved by their struggles, frustrations, sense of accomplishments? Im talking human drama. Ive been told by some people that if they dont have a horse in the show they dont care about the racing, its uninteresting. Thats true for example in Wsbk when there is no countryman to root for. But what happens when we learn about the human side of a rider? Some people will identify with them. For example, there is a rider in SX/MX who happens to be from Scotland that was showcased in the show ( Wilson). His team principal, a guy named Mitch, talks about how courageous it was for the family to move here to the US. Then, when the kid gets picked up by a team, his dad, who had been everything, mechanic, trainer, cheerleader, steps aside and even bans himself from attending the races because he knows that his presence may impede his kid from flying on his own. Learning this i found myself rooting for the kid. I became a fan. I now watch the Lites (lower) class with great interest. Its a long winded way of proposing, if we hand more content on the human drama of MotoGP players, i think it would generate more of a following.
6. The other good ideas proposed on the thread.
Good responses. I agree with a lot of what u guys are saying.
JohnK, great post, i think the niche aspect is something difficult to overcome. Living in SoCal, its frustrating to know so many people who ride but have zero interest in motoracing. Like Pov mentioned, i've taken heaps of people to the AMA round that we use to have locally at AutoClub speedway (California Speedway), and in the end, it would end up just 3-4 of my same buddies returning. ...., even worse, when i used to work for the trackday organization, i was always amazed at how many trackday regulars didnt know squat about racing. Now the AMA round has been cancelled. Im taking about SoCal bro, where we have perfect riding weather 24/7/365. Where bike nights happen in every other city on various nights of the week. Its frustrating how these dumb .......s all ride sport bikes but none of them know racing exists. Why do u think i spend so much time texting my buddies who i have met here on PS? Cuz u guys get it. Now how can i get others as enthusiastic or mildly enthusiastic about racing?
1. Broaden the market for the product. Im ok with Spain & Italy getting multiple rounds. Their people are uber enthusiastic about the sport, they pay the fees, and show up. Their enthusiasm doesnt hurt but helps. But also try and open it back up in Brazil, Turkey, SE Asia, India, S. Africa, maybe even Canada. Sanction fees should have a slide scale in these new areas, that is, start low in first year to hook, then agree to deals for multiple year contracts.
2. Well, for sure, let the masses see free content. Stop this rediculious ban on youtube. The diehards will buy the motogp.com pass because its comprehensive. Having races on SpeedTV and access to torrents hasnt stopped me from buying the pass. I suspect only diehards buy the pass anyway.
3. Better the racing aspect of the show while maintaining the authenticity of competition. I'd have a team study why the last year of the 990s worked so well, and would try to replicate this with the new formula. If that means having a tire war, lifing fuel limits, banning some forms of electronic aids, revenue sharing, etc. then implement.
4. For gods sake, shorten the gaps between races. 3-4 weeks off is simply too long. SX has races once a week, so given all the extra .... GP has two move, two weeks should be plenty of time. Even the dumb ..... in AMA learned that if you plan the schedule by region, travel costs wont drain the system. (Though at least this year GP figured out how to stay in the US for both rounds without flying to E. Europe in-between, as they did before).
5. Figure out how to produce some human interest content. In the States we have a bunch of shows dedicated to getting to know the players, drivers, athletes, etc. of various sports. Recently i saw a show called 'Inside the Outdoors' which documents in docudrama/reality show format some of the riders in MX. Its fantastic. I get to see the human side of the riders and their teams, sponsors, drama, and ..... Can we put together something like that for GP? Seriously, after watching this, it made me appreciate all the personnel and effort that goes into competing. It endeared me more to the riders who are shown as regular guys putting it all on the line. I think if we had something like this, we honestly wouldnt bicker about rider x for being a clown or an ....... or whatever. Plus it might get people more interested in seeing what happens to them as they go about competing the season. How much do we know about the riders not competing for the title? Are any of us moved by their struggles, frustrations, sense of accomplishments? Im talking human drama. Ive been told by some people that if they dont have a horse in the show they dont care about the racing, its uninteresting. Thats true for example in Wsbk when there is no countryman to root for. But what happens when we learn about the human side of a rider? Some people will identify with them. For example, there is a rider in SX/MX who happens to be from Scotland that was showcased in the show ( Wilson). His team principal, a guy named Mitch, talks about how courageous it was for the family to move here to the US. Then, when the kid gets picked up by a team, his dad, who had been everything, mechanic, trainer, cheerleader, steps aside and even bans himself from attending the races because he knows that his presence may impede his kid from flying on his own. Learning this i found myself rooting for the kid. I became a fan. I now watch the Lites (lower) class with great interest. Its a long winded way of proposing, if we hand more content on the human drama of MotoGP players, i think it would generate more of a following.
6. The other good ideas proposed on the thread.
Good responses. I agree with a lot of what u guys are saying.
JohnK, great post, i think the niche aspect is something difficult to overcome. Living in SoCal, its frustrating to know so many people who ride but have zero interest in motoracing. Like Pov mentioned, i've taken heaps of people to the AMA round that we use to have locally at AutoClub speedway (California Speedway), and in the end, it would end up just 3-4 of my same buddies returning. ...., even worse, when i used to work for the trackday organization, i was always amazed at how many trackday regulars didnt know squat about racing. Now the AMA round has been cancelled. Im taking about SoCal bro, where we have perfect riding weather 24/7/365. Where bike nights happen in every other city on various nights of the week. Its frustrating how these dumb .......s all ride sport bikes but none of them know racing exists. Why do u think i spend so much time texting my buddies who i have met here on PS? Cuz u guys get it. Now how can i get others as enthusiastic or mildly enthusiastic about racing?
1. Broaden the market for the product. Im ok with Spain & Italy getting multiple rounds. Their people are uber enthusiastic about the sport, they pay the fees, and show up. Their enthusiasm doesnt hurt but helps. But also try and open it back up in Brazil, Turkey, SE Asia, India, S. Africa, maybe even Canada. Sanction fees should have a slide scale in these new areas, that is, start low in first year to hook, then agree to deals for multiple year contracts.
2. Well, for sure, let the masses see free content. Stop this rediculious ban on youtube. The diehards will buy the motogp.com pass because its comprehensive. Having races on SpeedTV and access to torrents hasnt stopped me from buying the pass. I suspect only diehards buy the pass anyway.
3. Better the racing aspect of the show while maintaining the authenticity of competition. I'd have a team study why the last year of the 990s worked so well, and would try to replicate this with the new formula. If that means having a tire war, lifing fuel limits, banning some forms of electronic aids, revenue sharing, etc. then implement.
4. For gods sake, shorten the gaps between races. 3-4 weeks off is simply too long. SX has races once a week, so given all the extra .... GP has two move, two weeks should be plenty of time. Even the dumb ..... in AMA learned that if you plan the schedule by region, travel costs wont drain the system. (Though at least this year GP figured out how to stay in the US for both rounds without flying to E. Europe in-between, as they did before).
5. Figure out how to produce some human interest content. In the States we have a bunch of shows dedicated to getting to know the players, drivers, athletes, etc. of various sports. Recently i saw a show called 'Inside the Outdoors' which documents in docudrama/reality show format some of the riders in MX. Its fantastic. I get to see the human side of the riders and their teams, sponsors, drama, and ..... Can we put together something like that for GP? Seriously, after watching this, it made me appreciate all the personnel and effort that goes into competing. It endeared me more to the riders who are shown as regular guys putting it all on the line. I think if we had something like this, we honestly wouldnt bicker about rider x for being a clown or an ....... or whatever. Plus it might get people more interested in seeing what happens to them as they go about competing the season. How much do we know about the riders not competing for the title? Are any of us moved by their struggles, frustrations, sense of accomplishments? Im talking human drama. Ive been told by some people that if they dont have a horse in the show they dont care about the racing, its uninteresting. Thats true for example in Wsbk when there is no countryman to root for. But what happens when we learn about the human side of a rider? Some people will identify with them. For example, there is a rider in SX/MX who happens to be from Scotland that was showcased in the show ( Wilson). His team principal, a guy named Mitch, talks about how courageous it was for the family to move here to the US. Then, when the kid gets picked up by a team, his dad, who had been everything, mechanic, trainer, cheerleader, steps aside and even bans himself from attending the races because he knows that his presence may impede his kid from flying on his own. Learning this i found myself rooting for the kid. I became a fan. I now watch the Lites (lower) class with great interest. Its a long winded way of proposing, if we hand more content on the human drama of MotoGP players, i think it would generate more of a following.
6. The other good ideas proposed on the thread.
3. Better the racing aspect of the show while maintaining the authenticity of competition. I'd have a team study why the last year of the 990s worked so well, and would try to replicate this with the new formula. If that means having a tire war, lifing fuel limits, banning some forms of electronic aids, revenue sharing, etc. then implement.
were the 2006 tyres that much worse than the 07 rubber?
a liter more fuel, primitive or no slipper clutches and we get better racing.
not sure i agree about the shallow talent pool, the 06 season had some great riders out there, if casey had been on a better bike and lorenzo already in motogp it would have been perfect
pedrosa,hayden,melandri,gibernau are all great riders in my book
Final year on fully-developed bikes, development focus switching to the 800s, crappy tires, primitive slipper clutches and a relatively shallow talent pool. On the 990s, you could afford to ride sloppy and make a mistake, you had oodles of power to straighten things out on corner exit. On the 800s, if you lost a tenth somewhere you never, ever got it back. Add that to outstanding corner entry electronics and astonishingly grippy tires and you breed a generation of riders who are absolutely perfect every lap. When you also have three young riders who have used the best rider of the 990 era as a benchmark, and are pushing each other to greater heights of riding perfection - dragging that 990's era legend with them - and you get boring racing.
If you want great racing, you have to replicate what WSBK has: second-rate riders, crappy tires, less complicated electronics.
With that being said, how could anyone want GP to go there. I just wish people would appreciate GP for what it is