<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Austin @ Oct 1 2009, 09:25 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Kropotkin seems to think that some of the money spent on the MotoGP project will now go towards the SBK effort, the reason why Paul Bird Kawasaki can even afford Vermeulen and are rumored to be signing either Shakey or Sykes. For me, to sign a two year deal with Kawasaki, Vermeulen must have been given assurances that Kawasaki is 100 percent committed to the ZX10 project. The rumors I read linked him to Aprilia and Alstare Suzuki, both of which appear to be stronger motorcycles and teams than what Kawasaki has on offer. If Kawasaki continue down their usual path, which I believe they will until they prove otherwise, Vermeulen has just made a costly mistake. I hope I'm proved wrong.
Though I joke about Kawasaki's unceremonious departure from the bottom of the GP ranks, I think it is GP that have made a much bigger mistake by misjudging Kawasaki. Because of the MSMA's unyielding support of 800cc, another manufacturer has committed to WSBK without any real ambitions of fielding a MotoGP effort.
Any fans who want to watch BMW, Aprilia, or Kawasaki are required to watch WSBK. Any fans who like Ducati twins are required to watch WSBK. I anticipate that WSBK will also be encouraging Triumph to jump into the WSBK shark tank as well, possibly with displacement allowances that permit a triple to be competitive.
I think it's pretty clear that WSBK are trying to become a final destination for manufacturers. There are no testing restrictions on production bikes, and for the cost of developing and building a single MotoGP bike, a team could probably develop and build an entirely new street model that generates revenues instead of red numbers.
I'm really interested to see where InFront go from here. I think the deliberate addition of Aprilia and BMW signifies that they have ambitions to take the series somewhere. I wonder what moves they are going to make now that they have acquired quite a few WSBK-only manufacturers.