amazing that the driver was ok, did you see the marshals running for there lives.
imo, gp2 is much better to watch than f1.
imo, gp2 is much better to watch than f1.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Jul 2 2007, 06:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>amazing that the driver was ok, did you see the marshals running for there lives.
imo, gp2 is much better to watch than f1.
Agreed, they don't produce the turbulence that F1 cars do. If they get the regulations right then theres no reason why we can't have GP2 style races in F1.
imo, gp2 is much better to watch than f1.
Agreed, they don't produce the turbulence that F1 cars do. If they get the regulations right then theres no reason why we can't have GP2 style races in F1.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Orrmate @ Jul 2 2007, 09:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Agreed, they don't produce the turbulence that F1 cars do. If they get the regulations right then theres no reason why we can't have GP2 style races in F1.
The GP2 cars were designed specifically to encourage close racing and thrilling on track antics that we like to see, but they are all the same car. Achieving the same thing with regulations for free design is very difficult indeed, along with a few other considerations thats why F1 is struggling
The GP2 cars were designed specifically to encourage close racing and thrilling on track antics that we like to see, but they are all the same car. Achieving the same thing with regulations for free design is very difficult indeed, along with a few other considerations thats why F1 is struggling
Similar threads
