This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

A wee thought..

Joined Oct 2006
3K Posts | 197+
Living the dream in Scotland
I was just thinking tonight, rather than the whole twins, triples and fours rules for superbikes, with the GP guys now on diesels, why not make world supers a class for twins?

With Yamaha and Suzuki fielding four stroke fours in GP, why have similar engine configurations in Superbikes?

Or why not just downgrade Super to a world series like they did to sidecars, and like they have for 600s.

It just seems a bit daft to have pretend 4 stroke prototypes and real 4 stroke prototypes racing in seperate series.

Let battle commence!

Pete
 
I think production based racing has a place as a world championship and it should be kept. And the different rules making configurations "equal" is in theory good becasue it allows marques to showcase their roadgoing equipment as it is. In gp however everybody is forced to use the optimum format for the capacity limit (v or straight 4). The problem i find is that when a factory releases road bikes designed to replicate their gp bikes and then take them superbike racing, it looks like watered down gp.

Perhaps if Dorna bought the superbike series they could do something to stop this, or to make superbikes more different. The trouble is that superbike racing is designed for factories to showcase their best road going performance bikes. But since gp went four stroke all the roadgoing performance bikes are trying to emulate them, a problem that didn't exist in the past.

Maybe being forced to use twins isn't the right solution, but if the 1200 rule gets passed and Ducati start winning again perhaps honda will make themselfes a big twin and kick Ducatis arse as soon as the playing field is level (like they did with the rc51) . I would really like to see that happen agian, but i don't think it actually will.
 
The new 800's I think look a lot less like road bikes, so I don't think it will be as much of a problem in the near future.

The two-stroke thing is a nice idea, but the whole point of superbikes is to be a production based series. And I can't see manufacturers going back to two strokes.

I think maybe we need to accept that two strokes are a thing of the past. 250s will soon become 600s, and I have a sneaky feeling that 125s might also switch to four strokes one day, possibly in the form of 400s. Its a shame but fate is looming.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Feb 24 2007, 09:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I think production based racing has a place as a world championship and it should be kept. And the different rules making configurations "equal" is in theory good becasue it allows marques to showcase their roadgoing equipment as it is. In gp however everybody is forced to use the optimum format for the capacity limit (v or straight 4). The problem i find is that when a factory releases road bikes designed to replicate their gp bikes and then take them superbike racing, it looks like watered down gp.

Perhaps if Dorna bought the superbike series they could do something to stop this, or to make superbikes more different. The trouble is that superbike racing is designed for factories to showcase their best road going performance bikes. But since gp went four stroke all the roadgoing performance bikes are trying to emulate them, a problem that didn't exist in the past.

Maybe being forced to use twins isn't the right solution, but if the 1200 rule gets passed and Ducati start winning again perhaps honda will make themselfes a big twin and kick Ducatis arse as soon as the playing field is level (like they did with the rc51) . I would really like to see that happen agian, but i don't think it really will.

To be honest Tom, if Ducati, sorry all the manufacturers, are allowed to use 1200 cc twins, it shows how sad the series is.

Like you say, it should be a showcase for the production road based bikes, and I dont see Erik Buell crying that the rules are against him, but Ducati moan when they cant win, but can build a four for GP!!!!

It sucks, Its like KTM crying about the twins in the Dakar coz BMW and Yamaha were kicking their arse, but twins were ok when they were the only folk making twins for the Dakar!

I think the rules were cool in principal, but Ducati used them to their advantage, and exploited them.

A world championship loses credibility when it becomes a one make series, and like you say, the new road bikes are pretend GP bikes, so it makes Supers a wee bit obsolete.

Pete








<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Orrmate @ Feb 24 2007, 09:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>The new 800's I think look a lot less like road bikes, so I don't think it will be as much of a problem in the near future.

The two-stroke thing is a nice idea, but the whole point of superbikes is to be a production based series. And I can't see manufacturers going back to two strokes.

I think maybe we need to accept that two strokes are a thing of the past. 250s will soon become 600s, and I have a sneaky feeling that 125s might also switch to four strokes one day, possibly in the form of 400s. Its a shame but fate is looming.


Eh?
 
I know its MCN but they did report this week that Honda will be building a v4 superbike for the road with styling from the RCV212v, Ducati are also going ahead with a desmocedici for the road. So the idea of road bikes no longer looking like gp bikes is unlikely.

We have 250's till 2012 i think, after which i think they will become 400cc bikes, but thats not to relavant to this topic.

Pete i agree that Ducati have exploited the rules in a way that i don't think is doing the series any favours, but with gp being four stroke, superbikes may well become obsolete, they should do something to make it different.

Perhaps do all the races with pillions on the bikes too. That refelcts road riding for quite a few people. I think it'd be pretty hilarious.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Feb 24 2007, 10:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I know its MCN but they did report this week that Honda will be building a v4 superbike for the road with styling from the RCV212v, Ducati are also going ahead with a desmocedici for the road. So the idea of road bikes no longer looking like gp bikes is unlikely.

We have 250's till 2012 i think, after which i think they will become 400cc bikes, but thats not to relavant to this topic.

Pete i agree that Ducati have exploited the rules in a way that i don't think is doing the series any favours, but with gp being four stroke, superbikes may well become obsolete, they should do something to make it different.

Perhaps do all the races with pillions on the bikes too. That refelcts road riding for quite a few people. I think it'd be pretty hilarious.


<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Feb 24 2007, 10:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I know its MCN but they did report this week that Honda will be building a v4 superbike for the road with styling from the RCV212v, Ducati are also going ahead with a desmocedici for the road. So the idea of road bikes no longer looking like gp bikes is unlikely.

We have 250's till 2012 i think, after which i think they will become 400cc bikes, but thats not to relavant to this topic.

Pete i agree that Ducati have exploited the rules in a way that i don't think is doing the series any favours, but with gp being four stroke, superbikes may well become obsolete, they should do something to make it different.

Perhaps do all the races with pillions on the bikes too. That refelcts road riding for quite a few people. I think it'd be pretty hilarious.


Yeah, racing with wives on the back, (or when Nicky gets demoted, he can take a bloke, goat or something, each to his own, I'm open minded me) racing while being nagged would be ace!


Pete
 
To be totally honest i can't think of any ideas to make superbike different without effectively ruining it. But i am not sure the superbikes really have an issue yet. The crowds are still huge and there is still plenty of sponsorship money. The issue is that this year looks like one of the most competative for ages, but there are only really about 6-8 top level guys out there, and thats weak.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Feb 24 2007, 10:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>To be totally honest i can't think of any ideas to make superbike different without effectively ruining it. But i am not sure the superbikes really have an issue yet. The crowds are still huge and there is still plenty of sponsorship money. The issue is that this year looks like one of the most competative for ages, but there are only really about 6-8 top level guys out there, and thats weak.


Supers have never had any real depth of competition, its always 5 or so good guys, and a lot of also rans.

Pete
 
Good call, perhaps it should be cheaper to allow privateers to make a bigger impact. In fact, i think the bikes should be run closer to stock to allow the better of the road bikes to show through. Maybe the championship should be eliminated from a riders side, but be ran over a series of special events with different riders each weekendand have only a manufacturers competiton.

Or maybe run it like the A1gp car racing where teams represent their country or continent only, riding bikes that can only be from your continent of origin.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Feb 24 2007, 10:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Good call, perhaps it should be cheaper to allow privateers to make a bigger impact. In fact, i think the bikes should be run closer to stock to allow the better of the road bikes to show through. Maybe the championship should be eliminated from a riders side, but be ran over a series of special events with different riders each weekendand have only a manufacturers competiton.

Or maybe run it like the A1gp car racing where teams represent their country or continent only, riding bikes that can only be from your continent of origin.


Yep, I think there has to be a line in the sand somewhere, and yes, get the bikes closer to standard. I just dont see what relevance it has now, and to be honest, it was only ever a poor relation to GP.

I just dont get why it is so high profile, could you imagine a series where everyone was driving proddy based cars trying to rival F1! Ecclestone would shoot them!

Pete
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Feb 24 2007, 05:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Pete i agree that Ducati have exploited the rules in a way that i don't think is doing the series any favours, but with gp being four stroke, superbikes may well become obsolete, they should do something to make it different.

^^ Ducati have exploited the rules? You are a master of understatement my friend. Ducati feels the Japanese creeping up on them, solution=just build a bigger motor. At the rate they keep demanding displacement increases we will be seeing displacement sizes in the range of cubic inches instead of cc's. For this reason I am glad the Flamini' are selling WSBK. With any luck the new ownership will not cave in to Ducati's "if you dont give us what we want we will go home" tactic. Thankfully the AMA told them that the word fair doesnt equal advantage Ducati. As for Superbikes becoming obsolete I dont think it is likely to ever happen. People like the idea of watching others race heavily modified versions of their bikes being raced on a local and world stage. It is still a very good way to sell bikes.
 
I think the 1200 rule might come back and bite Ducati on the arse. A few other manufacturers have been intrested in taking advantage of it, namely KTM. It could be a way for smaller, European factories to get into SBK racing and not have to spend a fortune on building 1000cc bikes capable of beating the Japanese giants and Ducati. I don't doubt Ducati are being bitchy, spineless and lazy, but some good may come of it..... I hope. I doubt we'll see Honda come out with another RC51 type bike. They're all heavily into their GP programs now, and building supersports bikes capable of winning races, with technology from thier GP bikes. This really rules out twins, as I think they've decided four cylinders is the way to go to maximise performance. They might build more twin sportsbikes, but I dont think we'll see any more supersport, race-replica twins come out of the big four.
How much power would an extra 200cc be worth, keeping in mind the bike is a twin? Apparently the 999 has a ceiling of about 196hp, while JT's Honda is supposed to be making 215hp. That's 20hp they've got to make up right there, probably 25 by the end of the year, and that's just to match the fours, not gain an advantage I don't doubt that it can be done, but they will face all the same tuning restrictions that the fours do now, wich won't make it any easier, and in stock form the 1098 is still making less power than the jap bikes. I found that a little dissapointing. I suppose Ducati have left a little room for expansion of their engine size, though.
 
Honda, and especially with Ten kate are known to be serious power makers, so i am not surprised about that gap. I too don't really see honda competing with a big twin again, but it was great to see when they did it. The Ducati thing is a classic situation similar to many american "sports" cars. When they are obviously out engineered by their oposition, they decide that increasing engine size is the way to make progress, but there is more too it than that. Not saying Ducatis are bad bikes by any means, but they are not as well designed as the japanese competition, and thats why they ask for bigger engines.
 
True, Ducati have done some impressive things (I really like the desmo valves) but when you buy a Ducati you pay for prestige and trick suspension, brakes, ect. Japanese bikes may not have this level of one-off innovation, but they boast solid engineering bases, constantly using the best technologies to refine thier bikes. I like Ducatis (On some days of the week), but I dont belive that just because a bike is exotic, it automatically means it's a more refined work of engineering art that a more common machine.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (richo @ Feb 26 2007, 02:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>True, Ducati have done some impressive things (I really like the desmo valves) but when you buy a Ducati you pay for prestige and trick suspension, brakes, ect. Japanese bikes may not have this level of one-off innovation, but they boast solid engineering bases, constantly using the best technologies to refine thier bikes. I like Ducatis (On some days of the week), but I dont belive that just because a bike is exotic, it automatically means it's a more refined work of engineering art that a more common machine.

Yeah, a few of my mates have them, and me an jumkie agree (does anyone believe that!!!!!!!!) that they are the biz, but they will break your heart. I have to say that the 851 and 888 are absolutely gorgeous, 2 of the best looking bikes ever.

But, voting with my wallet, I buy Japanese. (I'm not really into race reps anyway)

Any other old gits like me rememer the old Battle of the Twins series? where you had Dukes, Guzzis and even Harleys racing togetherThat was amazing stuff. The Sound of Singles series was great too, mad XT and DR based specials racing Ducati Supermonos.

I'd like to see more of that.

Pete
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Feb 24 2007, 10:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>To be totally honest i can't think of any ideas to make superbike different without effectively ruining it. But i am not sure the superbikes really have an issue yet. The crowds are still huge and there is still plenty of sponsorship money. The issue is that this year looks like one of the most competative for ages, but there are only really about 6-8 top level guys out there, and thats weak.

It's just the same in Grand Prix my friend.
 
in grand prix its not uncommon for 12 guys to qualify within a second of each other. There are like 20 works bikes, and the field is so competative that if a rider had a bad day (say to the extent bayliss did at Qatar) they would definately struggle to find the top ten. Look at the riders on 4th row of a world superbike grid and they are mostly nobodies, do the same in gp and you'll find race winners and world champions. Its obvious gp is way more cmpetative throughout the length of the grid than superbikes is.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Feb 27 2007, 10:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>in grand prix its not uncommon for 12 guys to qualify within a second of each other. There are like 20 works bikes, and the field is so competative that if a rider had a bad day (say to the extent bayliss did at Qatar) they would definately struggle to find the top ten. Look at the riders on 4th row of a world superbike grid and they are mostly nobodies, do the same in gp and you'll find race winners and world champions. Its obvious gp is way more cmpetative throughout the length of the grid than superbikes is.

Sylvian Guintoli = Who?
Alex Hoffman = Who?
Checa= 12 years and 2 wins
Alex Barros = Even longer and a fraction more wins.
Jezza= Even though he's the token brit, 1 250 win in the wet.

It depends on how you view it.
 
Yes it does depend how you look at it of course. But i wouldn't include Guintoli or Hoffman as nobodies, they are on the way up and will make good riders in the future, and i am sure the same can be said for some world superbike guys. But if you compare the lists back to back, you will find the wsbk entry list falls very very weak. Barros, checa, and all the other are all better than, Nakatomi for example.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Feb 27 2007, 10:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Yes it does depend how you look at it of course. But i wouldn't include Guintoli or Hoffman as nobodies, they are on the way up and will make good riders in the future, and i am sure the same can be said for some world superbike guys. But if you compare the lists back to back, you will find the wsbk entry list falls very very weak. Barros, checa, and all the other are all better than, Nakatomi for example.

Barros and Checa are also wastes of seats that could be taken by up-and-coming riders, they had their chance, and they've squandered them.

I agree I may have been harsh on Hoffman, but I stand by Guintoli. He was in 250's for a good while, got ONE podium a few seasons ago, why does that consitute a Factory moto gp ride? The Almighty Dollar/Euro, that's why.

Barros better than WSBK riders? I think that was disproved last year, but Biaggi proved how big a talent he really is last weekend.

I think it's gonna be JT, Bayliss and Biaggi for the WSBK title contention this year, with JT coming out on top, barely.

<