<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Pinky @ Jan 9 2008, 11:28 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>damm can say anything bad about hayden, coz it seems his fans seems to think that people are inferring that he wasnt the fastest rider and therefore didnt deserve the title.
No man, not at all. I think you ask a fair question in this thread and its worth taking a more detailed look at it. (Oh, I know you respect his 06 title; you've mentioned it before). What I was talking about is you challenging that Hayden never "
whined". Well I agree with you, he did, and so did
all of them from time to time (yes, including Casey). But here is the point that I want you to
distinguish--between a "whiner" and somebody who has a "legitimate concern". Lets examine the question you pose on this thread topic below:
What does it mean to be a "<u>whiner</u>"?
WHINER/WHINGER: Some one who <u>repeatedly</u> makes silly and immature grumblings, a grouch, and trivial tantrum nit-picker; someone who makes annoying excuses that are petty and frivolous over and over.
Answer me these questions please:
1. Of all the "complainers" on the grid this season,
who of them had <u>actual</u> and <u>legitimate</u> (fairly public and accepted) reasons/problems to complain about their package--This person is NOT on the new REPEATEDLY?
Who is your answer:__________________
2.
Now compare this to the ones that probably had <u>nothing</u> or at least <u>very little</u> (perhaps imaginary) reasons/problems to complain about their package--this person was/is on the news REPEATEDLY?
Who is your answer:__________________
Your answer for the first question should produce a name(s) of a rider(s) with legitimate concerns and therefore should
NOT be considered a "whiner".
In the second instance is where I think you will find your answer as to who is the biggest
“whiner”. This is to be distinguished and not confused with who has “legitimate” concerns.
So who are the "whiners" and who are not really "whining"?