Geonerd
Desert Varmint
- Joined
- May 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,343
- Location
- Southern Aridzona - Hell's doorstep.
Good article, but my intention is not to say the 90 degree is the best option, just that it's capable of winning as the past has shown. Honda went into a different direction and it clearly works for them. Yamaha is winning with their inline four, but if they weren't, people would be saying they should switch to a V-Four. It's all relative to what success you have with it.
In other words, even though a particular layout or configuration is not used (whether due to rules, costs, etc) doesn't mean it can't be successful. I just don't believe Ducati needs to go the route of decreasing the angle on their engine in order to get better. The frame...ok, that needed to be done because of the rules, but I'm sure they still can be successful with the current engine layout.
After throwing darts at carbon fiber, the twin-beam frame design, and elsewhere ( with little effect), Rossi has now singled out the engine as the next thing that "Must be changed!" The press repeats the meme, and soon everyone is bitching about that terrible 90 degree Flintstone-era lump.
I'm not at all convinced that reducing the V angle from 90 to 72 (or whatever) will magically transform the machine. From what I understand, an overall engine rework that will allow more flexible swingarm pivot placement is probably needed, but shifting one cylinder bank an inch is, in itself, unlikely to 'cure' anything.