The laptimes in MotoGP have been lowered a lot in the last few years, in an interview with Harald Bartol (Chief engineer in KTM) he said that 80% of the bike's improved perfomance depends on the tires and the other 20% is gained with the developments in engine, chassis and aero.
I found that shocking, but it must be true if you take a detailed look at the results, in all the dry races this season we've seen Bridgestone riders qualify OK, and progressively loose performance during the race (respect to Michelin shod bikes).
But in China (wet GP) we saw Kenny leading the race (until the ...... Suzuki stopped) and Olivier Jaque finishing 2nd and riding much faster than Rossi, probably if Nakano's (who usually is the best Bridgestone rider) bike hadn't broke down he would have won that race easily.
My opinion may be biased because I'm a Kawa fan, but I really think there should be only 1 tire supplier, like in WSBK. MotoGP should be a championship for riders and bikes, not a tire competition between Bstone and Mich (and Dunlop
)
By the way, it's rumoured that the reason Rossi declined Ducati's offer was because he wouldn't have Michelins !!!
I found that shocking, but it must be true if you take a detailed look at the results, in all the dry races this season we've seen Bridgestone riders qualify OK, and progressively loose performance during the race (respect to Michelin shod bikes).
But in China (wet GP) we saw Kenny leading the race (until the ...... Suzuki stopped) and Olivier Jaque finishing 2nd and riding much faster than Rossi, probably if Nakano's (who usually is the best Bridgestone rider) bike hadn't broke down he would have won that race easily.
My opinion may be biased because I'm a Kawa fan, but I really think there should be only 1 tire supplier, like in WSBK. MotoGP should be a championship for riders and bikes, not a tire competition between Bstone and Mich (and Dunlop
By the way, it's rumoured that the reason Rossi declined Ducati's offer was because he wouldn't have Michelins !!!