The Untouchables

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Ok, I'm quoting you. Its ........!

What you want is Race Direction to officially become Rossi’s 'tongue lasher' to riders he doesn't want to race! You want Race Direction to interven based solely on Rossi's McCarthyistic accusations. Juan saw throw it, he called ......... Mikem & Gaz see through it, called ........ ( much to your surprise and chagrin). And I see through it, and call .........

Btw Gaz, if J4rn0 's take sounds familiar it's because it's not unique. Its a subtle attempt to advance the notion Marc is guilty while seemingly presenting it as 'impartial' because in it they concede Rossi was 'partially' to blame. It sounds familiar because Davide Brivio said basically the same ........ as J4rn0. He said Race Direction should have intervened after Rossi's accusations to admonish both. But consider the implications of such intervention! Race direction becomes the tongue lashing Department of Valentino Rossi. Based on a perceived grievance real imagined or for a particular Machiavellian effect!

Oh, welcome Jums!
You are easily satisfied with screaming ........, as usual, but let me ask you a direct question that cannot be dodged:

What do you say of this statement by Mike Webb -- who was speaking in teh name of Race Direction?

"We heard both drivers; we are of the opinion that there was fault on both sides, but according to the rules Marquez has not sought any contact, and did not break any rules, but we believe that his behavior was bothering Rossi who therefore reacted. Unfortunately he reacted in a way that goes against the rules."

I suppose this also is "........"?
Please give us your enlightened abd enlightening "opinion". :rolleyes:
 
Oh, welcome Jums!
You are easily satisfied with screaming ........, as usual, but let me ask you a direct question that cannot be dodged:

What do you say of this statement by Mike Webb -- who was speaking in teh name of Race Direction?

"We heard both drivers; we are of the opinion that there was fault on both sides, but according to the rules Marquez has not sought any contact, and did not break any rules, but we believe that his behavior was bothering Rossi who therefore reacted. Unfortunately he reacted in a way that goes against the rules."

I suppose this also is "........"?
Please give us your enlightened abd enlightening "opinion". :rolleyes:

Journo,

It is .........

As has been stated dozens, if not hundreds of times, Webb made a statement that was prejudicial, and UNPROFESSIONAL.

Saying that MM's behavior was bothering Rossi was essentially poisoning the entire encounter, and had the effect of trivializing what actually happened, to the point that the majority of the world suddenly saw VR as a MARTYR.

Webb can think whatever he wants about the situation personally, but to say that is almost unheard of when punishment is handed out in most other sports. To almost excuse the behavior of the offending party (VR) because you "believe" something that cannot be confirmed to be 100% true is ABSOLUTE .........

That you are even citing his quote as proof is moronic on your part.

Think about this.

Webb cannot actually provide any proof that MM is doing what he was accused of doing.

You in turn cite a statement, that has zero factual evidence to back it up, as evidence that something wrong was done.

It's the same asinine logic that you see where people blame a .... victim for getting ..... by adding as an aside, that if she hadn't been dressed "provocatively", nothing would have occurred.

Come on man, use your head.
 
Journo,

It is .........

As has been stated dozens, if not hundreds of times, Webb made a statement that was prejudicial, and UNPROFESSIONAL.

Saying that MM's behavior was bothering Rossi was essentially poisoning the entire encounter, and had the effect of trivializing what actually happened, to the point that the majority of the world suddenly saw VR as a MARTYR.

Webb can think whatever he wants about the situation personally, but to say that is almost unheard of when punishment is handed out in most other sports. To almost excuse the behavior of the offending party (VR) because you "believe" something that cannot be confirmed to be 100% true is ABSOLUTE .........

That you are even citing his quote as proof is moronic on your part.

Think about this.

Webb cannot actually provide any proof that MM is doing what he was accused of doing.

You in turn cite a statement, that has zero factual evidence to back it up, as evidence that something wrong was done.

It's the same asinine logic that you see where people blame a .... victim for getting ..... by adding as an aside, that if she hadn't been dressed "provocatively", nothing would have occurred.

Come on man, use your head.

Ah ok, so you are now Jum's spokesperson. Great.
I imagine Jums would just call ........ on Mike Webb and Race Direction, just like you, but I would like him to go on record with that.

Scripta Manent. You know. ;)
 
Ah ok, so you are now Jum's spokesperson. Great.
I imagine Jums would just call ........ on Mike Webb and Race Direction, just like you, but I would like him to go on record with that.

Scripta Manent. You know. ;)

It has to do with you citing a ........ statement that never should have been made...and never would have been made had it not involved Valentino Rossi.

Mike Webb and Race Direction have already proven themselves to be less than capable of enforcing the rules, so why would you give so much credence to a statement that has no evidence to support it, and secondly was self-serving?
 
J4rn0, had you been here instead of on your hiatus shielding yourself from what must have been a very painful meltdown, you would have known I've called ........ on Mike Webb over this episode. That you would then quote him here to advance your absurd assertion is laughable at best buddy.
 

JPS my brother I love the new location! I have some many questions about it. How cold is it? Is it really black? How does it feel to be the only thing there? I didn't know you were microscopic. :p
 
JPS my brother I love the new location! I have some many questions about it. How cold is it? Is it really black? How does it feel to be the only thing there? I didn't know you were microscopic. :p

Tell you what Dubby, it would certainly be preferable to the hordes recent members on here that disgorged en masse out of Rossi's rectum like a chronic bout of dysentry spouted ..... for a fortnight in the process.

Hopefully they've joined race direction and Uccio in clambering straight back up his arse.
 
Tell you what Dubby, it would certainly be preferable to the hordes recent members on here that disgorged en masse out of Rossi's rectum like a chronic bout of dysentry spouted ..... for a fortnight in the process.

Hopefully they've joined race direction and Uccio in clambering straight back up his arse.

I can't argue with.
 
JPS my brother I love the new location! I have some many questions about it. How cold is it? Is it really black? How does it feel to be the only thing there? I didn't know you were microscopic. :p

I'm glad you asked!

It's quite warm in here, and it happens to be quite devoid of ........ being pumped in and out.
 
Remember fellas, Stoner is the only legit ALIEN out there that can still ride a modern MotoGP machine to victory.

For me, watching Stoner was no different than watching Michael Jordan. He's a once in a lifetime talent that I find is better to appreciate than to disparage because of silly things like personality. If the media wanted to, they could have given him the VR treatment, and the detractors would have been sucking him off.

Rossi, Lorenzo, Marquez, and Pedrosa, while all talented, are not aliens.

Stoner is.
 
J4rn0, had you been here instead of on your hiatus shielding yourself from what must have been a very painful meltdown, you would have known I've called ........ on Mike Webb over this episode. That you would then quote him here to advance your absurd assertion is laughable at best buddy.

With all the patience of the world, one can grow pretty tired of reading the same endless nonsense from you, that's for sure, but this "shielding" imagination is just another example of your wishful thinking.

You are free to call ........ on the entire world, beginning from me and ending with Mike Webb and Race Direction, -- without ever providing any logic to whatever you say -- but that only shows your delusion of personal grandeur and your paranoia.

Face it -- Mike Webb is someone with a good reputation in our sport, like Brivio and others. On the other hand you are -- sorry to say -- an absolute nobody. It hurts, I know, -- your ambition exceeds your talent, that's the problem! But mudslinging respectable people is not going to help. Relax.
 
Last edited:
With all the patience of the world, one can grow pretty tired of reading the same endless nonsense from you, that's for sure, but this "shielding" imagination is just another example of your wishful thinking.

You are free to call ........ on the entire world, beginning from me and ending with Mike Webb and Race Direction, -- without ever providing any logic to whatever you say -- but that only shows your delusion of personal grandeur and your paranoia.

Face it -- Mike Webb is someone with a good reputation in our sport, like Brivio and others. On the other hand you are -- sorry to say -- an absolute nobody. It hurts, I know, -- your ambition exceeds your talent, that's the problem! But mudslinging respectable people is not going to help. Relax.

So Journo, would you be kind enough to provide us with the irrefutable evidence that backs up Webb's statement?
 
J4rn0, I know I'm a nobody, like you, that why we can debate this on level ground homie. Brivio is hardly unbiased, like Edwards, both are very much friends and fans of Rossi, not to mention owe much of their careers to him.

Mike Webb had no more a reason to 'believe' Rossi than to 'disbelieve' Marc's account. However the lack of action during the race, by Webb's own admission was because of the possible "impact on the championship" NOT what Race Direction is there to do: uphold the SAFETY of a race. Race Direction's mission is not to protect rider's championship, it is there to protect competitors from fellow riders who ride dangerously and not within the rules. When Rossi used his machine as a weapon, he ceased to use the M1 for its purpose. Mike Webb lost all credibility to do his job when he admitted his decision was first based on how it might effect Rossi’s title. He let a man who was not in a correct state of mind continue to circulate on a hot track while it had become apparent he had deliberately crashed fellow competitor out. You nor Mike Webb can get around this FACT!
 
Last edited:
Ok, this sucked me into this thread. No, you spectacularly missed the point! And you did so because again you read far too much into it and made an incorrect assumption of his meaning. Juan's point is brilliant; read his post again, but try to arrive at a different conclusion, you'll see then why it's poignant.

Also, your first post in this thread (attempt to nanny) it may have sounded "harsh", but do yourself the favor and go back on the forum (think it might be Sepang thread) to read J4rn0's reaction when the utterly relevant incident of Sic's death at the place Rossi deliberately crashed out Marc was brought up. You'll find J4rn0 also had a strong reaction.

I honestly like J4rn0, but I disagree with much of his opinions. Walter, when I said to him, "I'm glad you're back" I said it to highlight he had gone ballistic during the VR debacle ( temporarily as insane as your average bopperbozzo) and acknowledged he was returning to his old self, a bopper with an ability to present well argued measured posts--but still 'wrong'!

Juan may have chose to forgo the niceties, which frankly is more honest, because he saw right through J4rn0's thread here, which did backfire. He is even 'surprised' why he is not getting traction with Michaelm and Gaz, two other members who compose well argued and measured posts--while being correct.

Walter, do you see the point? On logic, J4rn0's original post and premise logically falls on its face. It is wrong. Some have taken the tact of presenting a measured response while Juan took the more direct approach, both valid, and correct, but you took issue with the 'approach" (only) of one?

J4rn0's thread backfired. The problem with his premise saying that Marc, like Rossi deserved to be chastised is utterly wrong. Marc got away with .... it was well before this incident, however, it seems Marc has increasing been called on the carpet, from practically nothing when he almost murdered the Thai rider, to getting sanctioned license points on a slight touch upon Pedrosa at Aragon, to being actually disqualified at Phillip Island (for his team's "error" on a day old rule, thanx Povol, keeping in mind there was in fact confusion about it). Yeah maybe in past when he attempted murder did Marc deserve stiffer sanctions. But the notion Race Insurrection should have stepped in after VR went Grassy Knoll at Sepang is stupid and negates J4rn0's entire call for RD to step in based on credible intervention. That is, if the standard for RD to step in must be when a rider makes a credible grievance this one would utterly lower it to mere rivality!!!!!! (Repeat this last sentence please). Allow me to repeat my point here, to make it clear why J4rn0's premise is absolutely incorrect, he is calling for BOTH Rossi AND MARC to be sanctioned in an episode where only ROSSI did something spectacularly WRONG!

J4rn0 is calling for Race Direction to interven because Rossi made baseless accusations! Think about how J4rn0 wants the power of RD to be used! The standard J4rn0 now wants the organizers to use to take action is based on the perpetrator, a PERVERSION of the standard to which J4rn0's perspective on this whole episode has led him to believe.

This "logic" falls on its face. Juan saw right through that ..... I do like J4rn0 more than your average bopper, but he went straight psycho over the Simoncelli Sepang Rossi comment. Where he was actually quite wrong since it was extraordinarily relevant, VR deliberately crashes out rider at scene of friend being killed in a freak crash. It was rather just emotional, all caps to confirm. But this here, a call for Race Direction to get involved when Rossi makes accusations whereby most across the spectrum believed it to be a "typical Rossi 'mind game'"! This would make Race Direction even more of a tool for Rossi! It would lead to Race Direction admonishing riders based on Rossi's whims! It wasn't enough that Rossi went around 'TONGUE LASHING' Pedrosa and Iannone so as to effect their determination on the track, but now J4rn0 is asking for Race Direction to officially do the tongue lashing.

Do you see now how absurd the standard of intervention (that's what J4rn0 is calling for) would be lowered to serve Rossi's purpose?!

(Juan called straight ........ on it, with a lot less words I may add.)

I cannot for the life of me see how you extrapolated all that from Juan's post, which on the face of it was a defective analogy or intended as some kind of Gen-X, nothing's sacred glibness. If this is not the case, it would be interesting to hear it in Juan's own words.

I have been reading J4rno's posts and from what I can glean, he understands as well as anyone that the standings in the championship are set in stone. In the end, it boils down to a basic disagreement between parties; some contending that the sole bad actor in the incident was Rossi and those believing both parties were guilty of poor sportsmanship. I can not see how this will ever really be "resolved". Ironically, Rossi will, one hopes, retire and have to live with himself and his poor judgment for the rest of his life, but Monkey Boy, will carry the weight of this controversy with him for what remains of his active career, which seems in some way, the more severe penalty of the two.

As far as Nannyism goes, it is the lack of it that made me gravitate to this forum.
 
Last edited:
So Journo, would you be kind enough to provide us with the irrefutable evidence that backs up Webb's statement?

The evidence is in just watching the Sepang race -- if one has eye one sees, if one doesn't want to see, that's another matter and they can hide behind the formula "he did not do anything against the rules".

So many ex-racers and knowledgeable people have expressed their opinions on the Sepang race in complete agreement with Mike Webb and Race Direction -- I'd say the overwhelming majority. That should mean something even to you.

Ah, for those who like to mix things -- you may have not noticed, but I'm speaking of the Sepang race here. :)
 
J4rn0, I know I'm a nobody, like you, that why we can debate this on level ground homie. Brivio is hardly unbiased, like Edwards, both are very much friends and fans of Rossi, not to mention owe much of their careers to him.

Mike Webb had no more a reason to 'believe' Rossi than to 'disbelieve' Marc's account. However the lack of action during the race, by Webb's own admission was because of the possible "impact on the championship" NOT what Race Direction is there to do: uphold the SAFETY of a race. Race Direction's mission is not to protect rider's championship, it is there to protect competitors from fellow riders who ride dangerously and not within the rules. When Rossi used his machine as a weapon, he ceased to use the M1 for its purpose. Mike Webb lost all credibility to do his job when he admitted his decision was first based on how it might effect Rossi’s title. He let a man who was not in a correct state of mind continue to circulate on a hot track while it had become apparent he had deliberately crashed fellow competitor out. You nor Mike Webb can get around this FACT!

Nice that you enter the merit a little bit. We nobodies can always debate if we want, you see.

I have already said that the failure of race direction to act during the race was a mistake, probably due to the fact that it was the two Untouchables who were playing a dangerous game. And, imho, now young star Marquez is more untouchable than old star Rossi.

Nobody in his senses can say that Marquez at Sepang was just happily racing his race... Brivio and Edwards might be (or have been) Rossi's friends, but they are serious and wouldn't go on record with ........ just for Rossi's sake. Even Doohan (a Honda man) is on record saying that both riders were at fault. About Sepang, no ex-racer said Webb was dreaming when he said MM was obstructing Rossi deliberately at Sepang.

Do a simple mental exercise: if Rossi wasn't involved, and you saw that kind of "duel" between any other riders, would you still be of the same opinion?
 
The evidence is in just watching the Sepang race -- if one has eye one sees, if one doesn't want to see, that's another matter and they can hide behind the formula "he did not do anything against the rules".

So many ex-racers and knowledgeable people have expressed their opinions on the Sepang race in complete agreement with Mike Webb and Race Direction -- I'd say the overwhelming majority. That should mean something even to you.

Ah, for those who like to mix things -- you may have not noticed, but I'm speaking of the Sepang race here. :)

Ah, now you see I thought you were going to post irrefutable evidence as opposed to another opinion.

I bolded a portion that is important for you to consider when bringing up the ex-racers and so on.

Regarding the bit about "hiding behind the formula", what you, as well as many others have failed to understand is that we're not hiding behind anything. Tell me, what exactly did MM do wrong other than to race another rider? The rider in question, couldn't keep his cool at the thought that someone would dare race him hard.

Citing the support of ex-racers is a joke since a few of those supporting VR are guys who have a lot of financial reasons not to upset the apple cart by going against the Yellow Horde. I recall one ex-racer who said that had it been anyone not named Valentino Rossi, they would have been black-flagged for the maneuver. And actually, there is precedent for it. Check out Suzuka 2003 if you need to see actual evidence of what warranted a DSQ at one time. But Mike Webb and Race Direction decided to make up their own punishment on the fly, which was not adequate...and then undermined their punishment right away by trying to foist responsibility on the victim of the aggressor's actions. You, along with the millions of others bought into this ........ hook, line, and sinker, because well...there lacks a critical awareness on your part to recognize how horrifically bad VR's actions were. Constantly minimizing and trivializing VR's role is precisely the thing that will influence a yet to be seen generation of riders to think such behavior is acceptable because there is no real discipline to be handed out by race direction. The ripple effect my friend.
 
Ah, now you see I thought you were going to post irrefutable evidence as opposed to another opinion.

I bolded a portion that is important for you to consider when bringing up the ex-racers and so on.

Regarding the bit about "hiding behind the formula", what you, as well as many others have failed to understand is that we're not hiding behind anything. Tell me, what exactly did MM do wrong other than to race another rider? The rider in question, couldn't keep his cool at the thought that someone would dare race him hard.

Citing the support of ex-racers is a joke since a few of those supporting VR are guys who have a lot of financial reasons not to upset the apple cart by going against the Yellow Horde. I recall one ex-racer who said that had it been anyone not named Valentino Rossi, they would have been black-flagged for the maneuver. And actually, there is precedent for it. Check out Suzuka 2003 if you need to see actual evidence of what warranted a DSQ at one time. But Mike Webb and Race Direction decided to make up their own punishment on the fly, which was not adequate...and then undermined their punishment right away by trying to foist responsibility on the victim of the aggressor's actions. You, along with the millions of others bought into this ........ hook, line, and sinker, because well...there lacks a critical awareness on your part to recognize how horrifically bad VR's actions were. Constantly minimizing and trivializing VR's role is precisely the thing that will influence a yet to be seen generation of riders to think such behavior is acceptable because there is no real discipline to be handed out by race direction. The ripple effect my friend.

Respectable opinions have no value? Well, I think they have. There, you have another opinion! :)
 
Most of Race Direction's work are judgement calls. It must necessarily be that way, there is no better way to do it. Asking for irrefutable evidence is a particularly pointless exercise.
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top