Stoner: Red Bull Ring run-off areas "dangerous"

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
6,290
Location
NJ
Two-time MotoGP champion Casey Stoner has expressed his concerns about the safety of the Red Bull Ring venue, which is hosting a grand prix in August.

Stoner, who serves as Ducati's test rider, will ride in Austria in less than 10 days' time and has spoken out about the asphalt run-offs at the Spielberg venue.

"I'm worried about the run-offs in Austria," the Australian told Sky Italia. "Some of them are even painted on. Imagine what will happen if it rains: a rider who crashes will not slow down, just the opposite.

"They have to focus more on safety because people's lives are fragile and you can't always put performance first, with run-off areas that won't slow the riders."

"The asphalt run-offs are dangerous, as Luis Salom's accident at Montmelo showed.

"To those who say that it's actually a safety measure I say no, it only benefits those who want to brake as late as possible and then go wide. It is only aimed at pleasing them, it has nothing to do with safety."

When the Ducati starts testing in Austria, the Safety Commission will have already examined the proposals presented to modify the area where Luis Salom crashed at Montmelo, especially Turn 12.

The question mark is the final corner

The only team that will not be present at Red Bull Ring on the 19th and 20th of July will be Honda, which has not received an invitation from Ducati - who rented the circuit - to run with the RC213V-S, the road version of the MotoGP bike.

However, both Marc Marquez and Dani Pedrosa had the chance to complete a number laps a few days ago to get used to the track.

"On the safety side, most of the circuit looks pretty good, but there's a question mark on the final corner, which is where Daniil Kvyat had his accident [on Saturday during F1's Austrian Grand Prix]," Marquez told Motorsport.com.

"We'll have to see how they protect that area with the Airfence. Until we race there, we won't know what needs to be improved."

I have to agree with him on this. The tarmac runoff areas are .... for bikes, and have nothing to do with safety. They were dressed up as a safety exercise, but it was always about letting guys rejoin the circuit without finding their cars beached and having their day ended.
 
I have to agree with him on this. The tarmac runoff areas are .... for bikes, and have nothing to do with safety. They were dressed up as a safety exercise, but it was always about letting guys rejoin the circuit without finding their cars beached and having their day ended.
The race track will never be completely safe. Agree the Tarmac run off areas aren't good for bikes other than that if riders run on at high speed, they are more likely to stay up right on Tarmac than gravel, so there is a case for it

For cars What happened to Schumacher at silverstone when he broke his leg? Did his brakes fail, I can't remenber. If not then I would argue that if he lost his steering but not his brakes then he would have scrubbed off lots of speed on Tarmac than gravel and had less of an impact

Gravel also makes cars and bikes flip out of control more instead of sliding like on Tarmac. both are dangerous but I would say for potential safety of spectators and marshalls, sliding is better than a heavy object being flipped 10 metres in the air
 
Im not sure of Honda's strategy to not test on a new track in a year where we have new tires and new electronics. They could find themselves way behind that weekend and could cost them dearly
 
The race track will never be completely safe. Agree the Tarmac run off areas aren't good for bikes other than that if riders run on at high speed, they are more likely to stay up right on Tarmac than gravel, so there is a case for it

For cars What happened to Schumacher at silverstone when he broke his leg? Did his brakes fail, I can't remenber. If not then I would argue that if he lost his steering but not his brakes then he would have scrubbed off lots of speed on Tarmac than gravel and had less of an impact

Gravel also makes cars and bikes flip out of control more instead of sliding like on Tarmac. both are dangerous but I would say for potential safety of spectators and marshalls, sliding is better than a heavy object being flipped 10 metres in the air

Luis Salom was killed precisely because there was no gravel trap at Catalunya for him to get slowed down in. Yes the gravel traps can cause the bike to flip, but if the option is to slide for a distance into possible obstacles, I'll take the gravel trap.

Silverstone '99 was a brake failure and he went off near the exit of Stowe. Even though he suffered the broken leg, he was far safer by 1999 in a F1 car than he would have been 5 years earlier. He hit the tire barrier at 67mph as opposed to the 191mph when the failure started. The front tires did lock-up before he left the circuit so a bit of speed was scrubbed.

The issue with the Red Bull Ring in my opinion starts with turn 7 which will see the bikes around 170-180 before braking, and the runoff area is not very much, and it is all tarmac. That leads into turn 8 because there is not a lot of room, so the tarmac will carry a bike and rider into a bad spot if they go down at the wrong angle. Then you have turn 1 is also another potential issue since they'll be doing around 200mph before braking. It's all tarmac, the tire barrier is a bit further away than in turn 7 and 8. But frankly while it's a short circuit, the bikes will be reaching very high speeds due to there only being 8 corners, two (turn 1 & 2) happen to be very slow, the rest are medium to medium high.
 
Luis Salom was killed precisely because there was no gravel trap at Catalunya for him to get slowed down in. Yes the gravel traps can cause the bike to flip, but if the option is to slide for a distance into possible obstacles, I'll take the gravel trap.

Silverstone '99 was a brake failure and he went off near the exit of Stowe. Even though he suffered the broken leg, he was far safer by 1999 in a F1 car than he would have been 5 years earlier. He hit the tire barrier at 67mph as opposed to the 191mph when the failure started. The front tires did lock-up before he left the circuit so a bit of speed was scrubbed.

The issue with the Red Bull Ring in my opinion starts with turn 7 which will see the bikes around 170-180 before braking, and the runoff area is not very much, and it is all tarmac. That leads into turn 8 because there is not a lot of room, so the tarmac will carry a bike and rider into a bad spot if they go down at the wrong angle. Then you have turn 1 is also another potential issue since they'll be doing around 200mph before braking. It's all tarmac, the tire barrier is a bit further away than in turn 7 and 8. But frankly while it's a short circuit, the bikes will be reaching very high speeds due to there only being 8 corners, two (turn 1 & 2) happen to be very slow, the rest are medium to medium high.
If schumachers front tyres locked then he would have slowed down a lot more before hitting the barrier with a Tarmac run off, therefore may not have hit the barrier as hard if at all. So in some scenarios there is cases for Tarmac run off that's all I was saying.

Salom was a freak accident and the bike hit him when it bounced off the air fence. It could have happened with gravel if the bike was flipping and landed on him.

My local circuit (croft) the back esses have Tarmac run off. They are taken on a decent bike at over 100mph, if the run off was gravel or grass and you run a bit wide you would come a massive cropper, on Tarmac it's not as issue.

There is cases for both, some one has to make a decision and I think they do it with the best intentions to keep everyone safe.
 
If schumachers front tyres locked then he would have slowed down a lot more before hitting the barrier with a Tarmac run off, therefore may not have hit the barrier as hard if at all. So in some scenarios there is cases for Tarmac run off that's all I was saying.

Salom was a freak accident and the bike hit him when it bounced off the air fence. It could have happened with gravel if the bike was flipping and landed on him.

My local circuit (croft) the back esses have Tarmac run off. They are taken on a decent bike at over 100mph, if the run off was gravel or grass and you run a bit wide you would come a massive cropper, on Tarmac it's not as issue.

There is cases for both, some one has to make a decision and I think they do it with the best intentions to keep everyone safe.
Bikes are different than cars, and Stoner has something of a record for being correct about safety issues regarding MotoGP bikes.

Unless he really is going to wildcard at the Austrian round as someone suggested, which I consider highly unlikely but would be delighted to see, he is also a fairly disinterested party with no axe to grind in terms of seeking competitive advantages.
 
Last edited:
Bikes are different than cars, and Stoner has something of a record for being correct about safety issues regarding MotoGP bikes.

Unless he really is going to wildcard at the Austrian round as someone suggested, which I consider highly unlikely but would be delighted to see, he is also a fairly disinterested party with no axe to grind in terms of seeking competitive advantages.
im aware cars are different, my point being that in some scenarios Tarmac run off has some advantages, in others it does not.

There is no easy answer, and it's not Black and white IMO. If I had the choice of having a massive run off area of Tarmac, or a small one with gravel and a wall, I would take Tarmac. It depends on many factors as most circuits are space restricted.
 
im aware cars are different, my point being that in some scenarios Tarmac run off has some advantages, in others it does not.

There is no easy answer, and it's not Black and white IMO. If I had the choice of having a massive run off area of Tarmac, or a small one with gravel and a wall, I would take Tarmac. It depends on many factors as most circuits are space restricted.

Sure, and I have no doubt your perspective/personal experience is vastly more knowledgeable/vastly exceeds mine.

My point was that I am inclined to believe Stoner in regard to GP bike racing, given several major incidents in the last 5- 10 years seem to have validated fairly directly safety concerns he raised prior to them actually occurring.
 
im aware cars are different, my point being that in some scenarios Tarmac run off has some advantages, in others it does not.

There is no easy answer, and it's not Black and white IMO. If I had the choice of having a massive run off area of Tarmac, or a small one with gravel and a wall, I would take Tarmac. It depends on many factors as most circuits are space restricted.

You should compare runoff areas of the same size, tarmac vs gravel. Big runoff with gravel isn't so bad, bikes flipping a disadvantage of course. Small runoff with tarmac and a wall, not so good.

Big tarmac runoffs encourage more risktaking I think, knowing you can probably rejoin the race if you make a mistake. If there's a gravel trap the possibility of rejoining is usually very small and the riders are less inclined to do stupid things.
 

I don't believe that.

I do think Austria would be attractive to race if he were going to because it's a new circuit for GP, and he seemed to be more interested in racing for HRC last year at the circuits he never raced.

With that said, he's not going to be racing.

He's going to run with the other riders on the track at the test to probably benchmark the Desmo. I don't know if he'll be going all out though to try and go to the top of the time sheets. Though it might be something he would do just as a middle finger to some riders.
 
I don't see what pleasure stoner gets out of track days. Once you've raced, track days are .....
 
I don't see what pleasure stoner gets out of track days. Once you've raced, track days are .....

It's a test day, and if he is to be believed --which we have to because everything supports it-- Casey is getting more enjoyment with working on the developmental side of the bike, something he didn't seem to do much of as the HRC test rider. Ducati is invested in him helping them with improving the bike, and why wouldn't he like it? He gets to ride GP machines without the hassle of press conferences, sponsor events, hostile crowds, and so on.
 
It's a test day, and if he is to be believed --which we have to because everything supports it-- Casey is getting more enjoyment with working on the developmental side of the bike, something he didn't seem to do much of as the HRC test rider. Ducati is invested in him helping them with improving the bike, and why wouldn't he like it? He gets to ride GP machines without the hassle of press conferences, sponsor events, hostile crowds, and so on.
I'm not sure, deep down I think he wants to race. He is still getting press attention etc now and attends most races.

I just cannot believe he gets as must enjoyment out of riding around testing than he did by winning races.
 
I'm not sure, deep down I think he wants to race. He is still getting press attention etc now and attends most races.

I just cannot believe he gets as must enjoyment out of riding around testing than he did by winning races.

I think he would like to race if he could dictate the surrounding atmosphere entirely. But that's an impossibility because of how uncontrollable most of it is.

One night when I was drinking, I had a thought that entered my mind that is outlandish and improbable. But it centered around the though of, what if Ducati decided to set up basically their version of the 2001 Nastro Azzurrro team for 2017 with Stoner running what amounts to a sponsor-less bike outside of maybe his personal sponsorship like Nolan as a way to minimize his obligations to nothing more than the press conference sessions. He can develop it as he sees fit based on his personal needs.

Tantalizing thought isn't it? Too bad they signed Lorenzo.
 
I think he would like to race if he could dictate the surrounding atmosphere entirely. But that's an impossibility because of how uncontrollable most of it is.

One night when I was drinking, I had a thought that entered my mind that is outlandish and improbable. But it centered around the though of, what if Ducati decided to set up basically their version of the 2001 Nastro Azzurrro team for 2017 with Stoner running what amounts to a sponsor-less bike outside of maybe his personal sponsorship like Nolan as a way to minimize his obligations to nothing more than the press conference sessions. He can develop it as he sees fit based on his personal needs.

Tantalizing thought isn't it? Too bad they signed Lorenzo.
It is a good thought.

Regards Lorenzo, don't underestimate the man. The bike is very different now to how it was in stoners era. He might well surprise everyone. He will be as motivated as ever out do Rossi, I think it will be a good move, he has lost faith with yam.
 
I dont think the run of areas look that bad at all. There are plenty of tracks out there with similar run of areas.
 
I just bought and downloaded the new DLC for Assetto Corsa, which include Red Bull Ring in all its glory. Never tried that track before in any racing game, so it's fun getting used to it ahead of the MotoGP race. Two wheels too many, unfortunately... (I hope I didn't sound like an ad there).

I can only agree after driving the track in the game that there are a few corners that must be a nightmare to lose control in. The last two before the start/finish straight, and the first corner all seem pretty scary when looking at the runoff zones.
 
I just bought and downloaded the new DLC for Assetto Corsa, which include Red Bull Ring in all its glory. Never tried that track before in any racing game, so it's fun getting used to it ahead of the MotoGP race. Two wheels too many, unfortunately... (I hope I didn't sound like an ad there).

I can only agree after driving the track in the game that there are a few corners that must be a nightmare to lose control in. The last two before the start/finish straight, and the first corner all seem pretty scary when looking at the runoff zones.

Yeah, the Red Pack for Assetto Corsa is awesome. I'm also playing it. Red Bull Ring is also in the newest MotoGP game, so if you want to experience it on virtual 2-wheels... pick up that game as well.
 
I don't believe that.

I do think Austria would be attractive to race if he were going to because it's a new circuit for GP, and he seemed to be more interested in racing for HRC last year at the circuits he never raced.

With that said, he's not going to be racing.

He's going to run with the other riders on the track at the test to probably benchmark the Desmo. I don't know if he'll be going all out though to try and go to the top of the time sheets. Though it might be something he would do just as a middle finger to some riders.


Same JPS and if true, it is somewhat of a prick of a move by Petrucci to make the comment given it should be up to CS and Ducati to make announcements

But, I did find “I saw him riding at Sepang, he was riding fast and wasn’t pushing. He quick over the flying lap, we need to see over a race distance,” to be of interest, particularly the highlighted section given the times posted.
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top