the point is not if rossi's speed was excessive, obviously in turn 1 lap 8 it was, the point is that the majority here have been adamantely adopting the opinion that this kind of dominant speed wasn't possible, that this accident could never have been possible because Stoner would always be so far ahead, and that only Stoner could ride the Duck,
VR is the new Melandri and so on. Well much earlier than expected it's all been exposed for the ........ it always was. That's the point....
What has been exposed exactly?
Yes VR was fast - at a wet track where things level out.
The thing I find funny (hypocrtitical even) is that you are one who (rightly) states that testing and/or practice means nothing as it is a 'once off effort', yet here VR was 'competitive' before falling (and after) on this one occasion yet all of a sudden it shows the all round speed. Sorry if I find it interesting but this was one race that was affected by weather when in practice he was significantly off the pace (relative to leaders) yet all is now solved.
Talpa, VR has lost the front or crashed more times this year already then he would in an entire season - this is not yet solved nor a season renaissance but a blip at this stage. When VR can attain and sustain the pace in both wet and dry conditions than certainly one can look at it as being 'problem solved'.
Gaz