Im confused. If stoner switched his own bike off and knew he would not be able to restart it track side why is he so pissed off at the marshals not helping him? do they carry the hrc equipment needed to restart the bike?
I dont know exactly what that means, but i suppose he means after it was too late. but there was another bit in that interview that i dont understand.
he said this:
"This is something that riders who are against Valentino have had to learn to deal with. It's completely unfair,
but it's something that's happened to me in the past when I've crashed. I've had people pushing my bike off the track - even when it's perfect and I can still race. I've had to fight with marshals to get them to try and get me started again." (where and when?)
but my own final opinion on this is:
for a moment after the crash i wanted to turn off the tv and go out, but i,m happy i didn't. for a few laps after that crash, the race looked like a fake race to me, but later it got better.
I couldn't forgive Rossi for ruining the race that could become a classic and especially that he had a very good chance of winning it, in a few laps he came from 12th to 4th and then 3th, but he hurried up or maybe he was cought by surprise when Stoner braked, and so Rossi became almost oblige to overtake him or he misjudge something else. Anyway It was Rossi's mistake and responsibility, i felt not only bad for them for losing the chance of winning this race, but i was more mad that i like other fans was rubbed of a nice battle between Rossi, Stoner and Lorenzo.
Luckily other riders (Pedrosa, Simonch, Spies, Hayden, Edwards) and the wet track saved the day.
Surprises of the gp: difference of the performance between dry and wet Ducati.
Losers of this race: Simonch and Spies and Dovizioso, but the first two showed again that they are not very far from the front runners, they just need more experience.